0
   

Why Liberals Lie About What They Believe

 
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jun, 2008 09:59 pm
parados wrote:
Boy, those conservatives are all white. And some of them are even almost svelt.


http://www.harvestbankmd.com/images/Michael_Steele.jpg

http://americansongbook.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/janice_rogers_brown.jpg

http://www.bpc.edu/news_and_info/news/Archive2003/2003-10-Oct/Herman-Cain.jpg

http://www.cnn.com/US/9805/01/cleaver.late.obit/cleaver.jpg

http://www.buddytv.com/articles/dancing-with-the-stars/images/clyde-1.jpg

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Media/Homepage/bamb.jpg

http://blogs.bet.com/news/playahater/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/karlmalone.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Condoleezza_Rice.jpg/480px-Condoleezza_Rice.jpg

http://www.lynnswann.com/swann_docs/about/accents.jpg

http://www.denison.edu/offices/publicaffairs/pressreleases/images/watts.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cc/Deroy_Murdock_PR_photo_-_Scripps_Howard.jpg/180px-Deroy_Murdock_PR_photo_-_Scripps_Howard.jpg

http://www.liberal-international.org/contentFiles/images/Walter.JPG

http://www.weneedtostop.com/1SHELBY.jpg

Are you really attempting to further Cyclo's ridiculous claim?
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jun, 2008 10:32 pm
Not to change the subject, but I worship Lynn Swann like a God.

Seriously.
0 Replies
 
Wy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 02:21 am
I hesitate to say this, but I think I'm centrist-left. The outer fringes of both liberalism and conservatism seem absurd -- why don't people see that either far fringe is proposing ridiculous options?

Among the problems is that liberals refuse to believe that a conservative viewpoint could ever be good, and the same can be said for conservatives.

As a country we are far too involved in demonizing each other and not involved enough in thinking -- really thinking -- about the issues. Both conservatives and liberals collect a bunch of sound bites and run with them, to the detriment of honest debate and serious discussion.

And I think conservatives and liberals define words differently, adding to the confusion. When a conservative says "family values" a liberal hears "patriarch-controlled, low valuation of women (except as housekeepers and childbearers), military-style discipline, no opinions allowed except that of the man of the house, the ruin of American society."

When a liberal says "family values" a conservative hears "no values, no morals, everybody does what they want, nobody values tradition, the ruin of American society."

I find that I, personally, am better off when Democrats are in power. So I generally tend to vote that way (especially after this last Bush, who has been a big disappointment, even for a Horrible Demon Republican), but I try to listen to anyone who isn't screaming such absurd rhetoric that I can't find a way to take it seriously.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 07:29 am
Finn,

The only way you could disprove Cyclo with the pictures you have posted so far is if there are about 400 Conservatives in the US. Posting pictures from the 5% doesn't really disprove his claim.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 04:25 pm
Wy wrote:
I hesitate to say this, but I think I'm centrist-left. The outer fringes of both liberalism and conservatism seem absurd -- why don't people see that either far fringe is proposing ridiculous options?

Among the problems is that liberals refuse to believe that a conservative viewpoint could ever be good, and the same can be said for conservatives.

As a country we are far too involved in demonizing each other and not involved enough in thinking -- really thinking -- about the issues. Both conservatives and liberals collect a bunch of sound bites and run with them, to the detriment of honest debate and serious discussion.

And I think conservatives and liberals define words differently, adding to the confusion. When a conservative says "family values" a liberal hears "patriarch-controlled, low valuation of women (except as housekeepers and childbearers), military-style discipline, no opinions allowed except that of the man of the house, the ruin of American society."

When a liberal says "family values" a conservative hears "no values, no morals, everybody does what they want, nobody values tradition, the ruin of American society."

I find that I, personally, am better off when Democrats are in power. So I generally tend to vote that way (especially after this last Bush, who has been a big disappointment, even for a Horrible Demon Republican), but I try to listen to anyone who isn't screaming such absurd rhetoric that I can't find a way to take it seriously.


The only part of this post I disagree with is this part...
Quote:
I find that I, personally, am better off when Democrats are in power.


I am better off when repubs are in power.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 04:35 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
The funny thing to me is how ugly the people posted as 'Conservative Ideal' are...

Not even in defense can ya find a bunch of good-looking people.

Cycloptichorn


This applies pretty much equally to the second group.

Thanks for playing tho!

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 04:52 pm
parados wrote:
Finn,

The only way you could disprove Cyclo with the pictures you have posted so far is if there are about 400 Conservatives in the US. Posting pictures from the 5% doesn't really disprove his claim.


OK Parados you got me. I can't disprove Cyclo's contention that 95% of conservatives are fat whites with pictures. Geez, I thought I could sneak it by everyone but I didn't count on razor-sharp Parados. Damn!

BTW - Did you ever notice that 95% of all liberals have abnormally small heads?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 04:55 pm
kickycan wrote:
Not to change the subject, but I worship Lynn Swann like a God.

Seriously.


Don't tell me you're one of those New Yorkers who rooted for the Steelers in their hey day because the NY teams sucked.

Would you have voted for him?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 04:57 pm
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
parados wrote:
Finn,

The only way you could disprove Cyclo with the pictures you have posted so far is if there are about 400 Conservatives in the US. Posting pictures from the 5% doesn't really disprove his claim.


OK Parados you got me. I can't disprove Cyclo's contention that 95% of conservatives are fat whites with pictures. Geez, I thought I could sneak it by everyone but I didn't count on razor-sharp Parados. Damn!

BTW - Did you ever notice that 95% of all liberals have abnormally small heads?


Are you going to post pictures to prove that?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 05:06 pm
parados wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
parados wrote:
Finn,

The only way you could disprove Cyclo with the pictures you have posted so far is if there are about 400 Conservatives in the US. Posting pictures from the 5% doesn't really disprove his claim.


OK Parados you got me. I can't disprove Cyclo's contention that 95% of conservatives are fat whites with pictures. Geez, I thought I could sneak it by everyone but I didn't count on razor-sharp Parados. Damn!

BTW - Did you ever notice that 95% of all liberals have abnormally small heads?


Are you going to post pictures to prove that?


As soon as you post the pics of ALL of the 95% of conservatives to prove your point.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 05:11 pm
Confused so now we're judging parties by looks?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 05:12 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
Confused so now we're judging parties by looks?


I was merely judging their pale, porcine propensities. I'm sure they are nice people. Some of them.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 05:14 pm
in other words, judging looks... or stereotypes, rather.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 05:15 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
in other words, judging looks... or stereotypes, rather.


I just find it to be an interesting coincidence.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 05:27 pm
cyclop, you're a smart guy. i think you can see through that yourself.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 08:39 pm
parados wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
parados wrote:
Finn,

The only way you could disprove Cyclo with the pictures you have posted so far is if there are about 400 Conservatives in the US. Posting pictures from the 5% doesn't really disprove his claim.


OK Parados you got me. I can't disprove Cyclo's contention that 95% of conservatives are fat whites with pictures. Geez, I thought I could sneak it by everyone but I didn't count on razor-sharp Parados. Damn!

BTW - Did you ever notice that 95% of all liberals have abnormally small heads?


Are you going to post pictures to prove that?


Sure.

Bill & Hillary

http://www.saveourseas.org/News/pinheads2.jpg
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 08:55 pm
http://www.geocities.com/upakaascetic/campbell.gif
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 09:02 pm
Cyclo may be suffering a case of "flyover jerkiness"

Cool
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2008 09:19 pm
dyslexia wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/upakaascetic/campbell.gif



Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 02:33:50