0
   

Why Liberals Lie About What They Believe

 
 
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 11:26 am
Why Liberals Lie About What They Believe

Once you've watched liberals long enough to understand how they think -- scratch that, how they feel -- they become extraordinarily predictable.

To begin with, the liberal agenda is, in many respects, the same as it was in the thirties. Whether you call it communism, fascism, socialism, liberalism, or progressivism, the only real difference is how much they believe they can get away with, the way they sell it to people, and the latest trendy name for what they believe.

So, once the liberals pick a policy from their stale program to push, the next step is to get it implemented. This is where liberals have problems because whether a policy makes sense, is practical, or actually improves people's lives is of secondary importance to them. What is important to liberals is whether supporting or opposing that policy makes them feel good about themselves.

This is why liberals continue to support dysfunctional policies that have been failing miserably for decades and why they often oppose common sense programs that have been proven to work time and time again -- because it isn't about whether it works or not, it's about how it makes them feel.

In other words, a liberal will almost always prefer a policy that's extremely expensive, is difficult to implement, helps almost no one, but seems "nice" -- to a policy that is cheap, simple to implement, extremely effective, and seems "mean."

However, since most Americans make decisions about policies based on whether or not they believe the policy makes people's lives better or worse, liberals have had to become habitually dishonest about what they believe and want to do to get their ideas put into action.

This is a point worth stressing because many people who aren't familiar with politics believe that conservatives and liberals are simply flip sides of the same coin and therefore, approach issues the same way. However, conservatives genuinely believe that this is a center-right country. That's why conservatives have no qualms about being publicly labeled as conservatives and it's part of the reason why we're much more honest than the Left -- because we believe that a majority of the American people generally agree with us and share our values.

So, those of us on the Right spend our time trying to explain to the American people what we really want to do, while the Left spends its time trying to hide what it really wants to do from the American people.

Because of this, when liberals don't feel that the political winds are blowing in their direction, not only will they generally avoid discussing the things they believe, they will typically deny that they believe them at all.

Additionally, liberals go to bizarre lengths to tilt the political playing field in their favor. They move into the mainstream media so that they can tip what are supposed to be "objective" news stories in their favor. They get into positions of power in our educational system so that they can teach kids liberal propaganda before they're old enough to know better. They uniformly support judges who care nothing about the Constitution as long as it moves liberal ideological goals forward. Even the Left's support of illegal immigration is rooted in the desire to bring in millions of poor people from socialist countries who are more likely to vote Democratic. If they can't convince the American voters they're right, then they'll just bring in some new voters.

More disturbing is the Left's ever-increasing reliance on what are commonly thought of as fascist tactics. Liberals at college campuses attempt to disrupt conservative speeches and the Democrats want to try to drive conservative talk radio hosts off the air with the Fairness Doctrine. Conservatives like Tom DeLay, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter have been targeted criminally for political reasons and there's even talk of trying to jail members of the Bush Administration over policy differences after they're out of office. Ideological soulmates of modern liberals -- like Stalin, Lenin, and Mao -- would certainly approve of those tactics.

Still, even though this is a center-right country, we do have political cycles and there are times when those cycles favor the Left. When that happens and the Lefties start to get a bit more confident, usually a few liberals at the edges will start talking about what they want to do. At that early point, most other liberals will still vehemently deny their ideological goals to the public out of fear that it will prevent them from getting into power.

However, when the Left gains enough strength to be capable of getting one of the policies they favor implemented, all the liberals who previously denied that they supported it will unapologetically shift on a dime and vote for it en masse -- while they rely on their ideological allies in the media and the fact that many Americans are ill informed about politics to cover their tracks.

So, if you want to know what liberals want to do, their words mean absolutely nothing because lying about their agenda has become as natural to them as chasing a cat is to a dog.

Instead, what you have to do is watch what other liberals have done when they have come into power. Look at Canada, where conservatives are being put on trial for hate crimes because they've dared to criticize Muslims. Look at European countries, where they have socialistic economies, sky high tax rates, rigid speech codes, and overweening nannystates. You can even look at liberal enclaves in the United States like Berkeley and San Francisco, where members of the military are treated like pariahs and they boo the national anthem.

If you believe the liberals in Berkeley, France, Canada or for that matter in the bowels of the Daily Kos or Huffington Post, are significantly different than, say Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, you are kidding yourself. The only differences are in what they think they can get away with and how honest they are willing to be about their agenda.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 3,498 • Replies: 78
No top replies

 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 11:31 am
Robbing the grade 10 English class for articles again McG?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 11:34 am
Funny how Conservatives seem to think that willingly and knowingly breaking the law are just 'policy differences.'

The author of this piece, John Hawkins:

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall//colpics/columnistHawkins.gif

Why is it that 95% of Conservatives are fat white people?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 11:35 am
Did you two actually read this?

Bob LaBlah
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 11:46 am
if the author of that article had any insight into what fascism and different kinds of communism were, he would be laughing at what he wrote. nothing new here, just another ignoramus.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 11:52 am
For an article that posits that liberals are vague and put feeling good over substance the author doesn't seem to post one concrete example to support his position.

That leads me to the conclusion that -
1. The author is a liberal.
2. The author is an idiot projecting his own actions onto liberals.


I am leaning toward the second choice.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 11:54 am
Just more swift boat tactics at play.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 12:33 pm
What idiot posted the article?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 01:24 pm
Very Happy

*whew*

I am glad to see the responses I predicted. I'd say the article was spot on.

Thanks guys!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 01:30 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Very Happy

*whew*

I am glad to see the responses I predicted. I'd say the article was spot on.

Thanks guys!


Ouch. It hurts to be stabbed by that sharp wit.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 03:47 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Very Happy

*whew*

I am glad to see the responses I predicted. I'd say the article was spot on.

Thanks guys!

Perhaps you could point to the specifics in the article that I said weren't there.

But lets look at one of the author's main points.
Quote:
In other words, a liberal will almost always prefer a policy that's extremely expensive, is difficult to implement, helps almost no one, but seems "nice" -- to a policy that is cheap, simple to implement, extremely effective, and seems "mean."

However, since most Americans make decisions about policies based on whether or not they believe the policy makes people's lives better or worse, liberals have had to become habitually dishonest about what they believe and want to do to get their ideas put into action.

Of course you could just explain how the Bush administrations invasion of Iraq was cheap, simple to implement, extremely effective and they never told a single lie to the public in order to promote their invasion. That would go a long way toward supporting what the author said. But since no one can defend the Iraq invasion on those points, I guess the author is doing nothing but blowing smoke and McG is more than happy to "feel good" about how the author in vague terms supported McG's world view.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 04:05 pm
A few years back I watched this movie called "Life Force." It was about a space expedition where a group of scientists were exploring the tail of Haley's Comet. They discovered an alien space ship mingled in the comet's debris and boarded said ship only to discover three floating, naked bodies. The ship and contents were brought back to earth and the bodies turned out to be space vampires, who, upon arrival on Earth, woke up and proceeded to destroy the planet.

After the movie was over I was quite angry with myself for having watched the entire thing, realizing that was time I could never have back -- valuable time that could have been used in a much more productive manner.

I am now re-living that experience, having read McGentrix's article in its entirety.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 04:08 pm
Hah! I only read about the first sentence and a half.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 04:12 pm
Obviously... Bush is a liberal. The Iraq invasion was a nice thing to do.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 04:40 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Funny how Conservatives seem to think that willingly and knowingly breaking the law are just 'policy differences.'

The author of this piece, John Hawkins:

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall//colpics/columnistHawkins.gif

Why is it that 95% of Conservatives are fat white people?

Cycloptichorn


And you know this how?
Do you have statistics to back it up, or are you just pulling numbers out of your ass?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 04:50 pm
mysteryman wrote:
And you know this how?
Do you have statistics to back it up, or are you just pulling numbers out of your ass?


MM, I know you like to give the benefit of the doubt and all, but come on ... of course he's pulling numbers out of his ass.


A better question is why is it that 67% of Democrats are gay men?
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 04:54 pm
Why do most gay men insist on using Arnold as an avatar?

What's up with that?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 05:04 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Why do most gay men insist on using Arnold as an avatar?

What's up with that?
\cigar
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 06:39 pm
"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar..."
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 06:48 pm
oooh, gay men! good one, tico... now that has to sting!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why Liberals Lie About What They Believe
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 02:36:42