gustavratzenhofer wrote:You guys are still going at it?
Ok. Carry on.
I think we'll be going at it until someone rubs dag the right way.
gus ... can you oblige?
because i was twisting your arm to discuss this
Dag likes you, Tico. She is excited by your hardened Republican body.
I have no control over that.
Why did I say that?
I sounded like a Republican and I am a bit embarrassed by such a statement.
Forgive me.
Dag, is that you in that avatar?
Back off snood.
You can't handle the truth.
And if anyone is going to get kick boxed all to hell it's me. Me, dammit !
hiya snood. indeed it is. fb, i ain't all that good at kickboxing, just straight up traditional old skool boxing.... and i'm also good at kicking it back, drinking beer and such. and i much prefer it in my day to day life.
These McGentrix people......they make the worst of government possible.
There are just enough of them to drag us all along.
Boy, those conservatives are all white. And some of them are even almost svelt.
As to "lying about what they believe", here's a passage from Vincent Bugliosi's latest book - about Bush and Iraq:
In President Bush's first speech to the nation, on October 7, 2002, from Cincinnati, he told the American people that Saddam Hussein was great danger to our nation, either by Hussein attacking us with WMDs, or by giving these weapons to a terrorist group to do so. Bush said this attack could happen on "any given day," meaning that the threat was imminent.
The only big problem for Bush in a trial is that on October 1, just six days earlier, the CIA sent Bush its 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, a classified, top-secret report, that represented the consensus opinion of all sixteen US intelligence agencies on the issue of whether or not Hussein was an imminent threat to the security of this country.
On page 8, it clearly and unequivocally says... that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the security of this country; that he would only be a threat to us if he feared that America was about to attack him.
So we know--not think, but know--that when George Bush told the nation on the evening of October 7, 2002, that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat to the security of the nation, he was telling millions of unsuspecting Americans the exact opposite of what his own CIA was telling him.
The funny thing to me is how ugly the people posted as 'Conservative Ideal' are...
Not even in defense can ya find a bunch of good-looking people.
Cycloptichorn
snood wrote:As to "lying about what they believe", here's a passage from Vincent Bugliosi's latest book - about Bush and Iraq:
In President Bush's first speech to the nation, on October 7, 2002, from Cincinnati, he told the American people that Saddam Hussein was great danger to our nation, either by Hussein attacking us with WMDs, or by giving these weapons to a terrorist group to do so. Bush said this attack could happen on "any given day," meaning that the threat was imminent.
The only big problem for Bush in a trial is that on October 1, just six days earlier, the CIA sent Bush its 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, a classified, top-secret report, that represented the consensus opinion of all sixteen US intelligence agencies on the issue of whether or not Hussein was an imminent threat to the security of this country.
On page 8, it clearly and unequivocally says... that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the security of this country; that he would only be a threat to us if he feared that America was about to attack him.
So we know--not think, but know--that when George Bush told the nation on the evening of October 7, 2002, that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat to the security of the nation, he was telling millions of unsuspecting Americans the exact opposite of what his own CIA was telling him.
Hey Snood. Bush wasn't lying about Saddam being an immenent threat, after all Bush was already making plans to attack him so Saddam should have been afraid that America was about to attack.
Of course that leaves Bush with another lie that he can't wiggle out of.
Cycloptichorn wrote:The funny thing to me is how ugly the people posted as 'Conservative Ideal' are...
Not even in defense can ya find a bunch of good-looking people.
Cycloptichorn
I guess that's what comes from having only one eye.
