soz wrote-
Quote:Obama seems to be pretty good at that.
What does that mean soz? Even if you had said more than "seems" and that he was pretty good it still wouldn't mean anything that I can see. And you meant that he was pretty good and stuck in the "seems" to imply you are a still a floater and up for better offers.
What is your evidence and what are your qualifications for making such a judgment.
Is it just female intuition? Which I respect by the way. Perhaps more than I ought to given my religious education.
Those who failed to get on to his inner team might not agree with you. And there would be more of them than the ones who did get on. Some with high academic achievements on their CVs. And track records in State elections. If Mr Obamo doesn't win the election the knives will be out for his choices. After the event of course. That's how most history books are written.
There are a lot more appointments to be made in the Oval Office than there are on a campaign team. And other forces are in play which he knows little about. The Gutsy Broad has much more experience of that stuff with her husband biting the carpet night after night over the promises he had made earlier.
And you a lady too. A woman in the white house. We can talk about babies and nappies and fashions and whatnot for ever and ever once the hand that rocks the cradle gets us by the goolies.
I would have thought you would be in favour of that. English men have never been so docile and uncomplaining as they became after 13 years of that silly old Mrs Thatcher woman. Some of them, rather a lot actually, go about acting as if they are very pleased with this station in life.
Surely, that sounds pretty good eh?
Only an intuition would say not. One that might not like tamed men maybe.
