1
   

Obama Gets His Hands Dirty

 
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 08:53 am
maporsche wrote:
engineer wrote:
sozobe wrote:

Not a deity though.

None of us supporting Obama have ever said that. .


NO Obama supporters? Zero? Really?

Nope. No walking on water that I can find. Saying a politician is trying to stay out of the ooze that surrounds our usual campaigns or saying he is a breath of fresh air is a far cry from saying he's a saint. (But if you find someone who thinks Obama is a deity, post the link and I'll conceed the point. Very Happy )
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 08:56 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
but progress has been made.... some see the glass as half empty.... some as half full...


So you and Obama are in agreement.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:00 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
the anti obama crowd as you say are, when using the term messiah, referring to the near religious fervor which many Obama supporters treat him with..... and you know that...thanks for your patience...

But "near religious fervor" is your term. They like to be "for" their candidate instead of "against" the other guy or voting for the "lesser of two evils." You are for you candidate. You were frothing a few months ago about the treatment she was getting in the press, etc, yet you don't worship her. If some of Obama's supporters are inspired by him, great. Some of Clinton's supporters are equally inspired. I've seen them praising her to the heavens on TV. Maybe McCain has inspired someone as well. Still, I don't see the "near religious fervor."
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:01 am
FreeDuck wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
but progress has been made.... some see the glass as half empty.... some as half full...


So you and Obama are in agreement.


on this issue we are in agreement...
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:11 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
A pastor on Morning Joe this morning was speaking about how Wright was absolutely not representative of the black church or the beliefs of the black community. He said Wrights rhetoric was very 45 year old black Nationalistic and no longer had any place or influence in the black community.


Tell that to the 1000's who flock to Trinity every Sunday morning. Rolling Eyes


So you think Wright represents and speaks for the black community?

so the other guy was Tomming?


This is how people expose their ignorance...
No ONE PERSON speaks for the ENTIRE Black community.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:12 am
and I indicated I believed that any ONE person speaks for the black community and exposed my ignorance where exactly?
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:14 am
If I have to point it out to you, then that says a whole lot more.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:23 am
ahhh... so it's official... I'm a racist?
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:25 am
eoe wrote:
If I have to point it out to you, then that says a whole lot more.


.....about your inability to make a point?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:38 am
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:55 am
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
A pastor on Morning Joe this morning was speaking about how Wright was absolutely not representative of the black church or the beliefs of the black community. He said Wrights rhetoric was very 45 year old black Nationalistic and no longer had any place or influence in the black community.


Tell that to the 1000's who flock to Trinity every Sunday morning. Rolling Eyes


So you think Wright represents and speaks for the black community?

so the other guy was Tomming?


This is how people expose their ignorance...
No ONE PERSON speaks for the ENTIRE Black community.


I must be really ignorant, cause I don't see the point either.

A couple thousand attending a church is still only a fraction of the population.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:06 am
That's right. There are 1000's who flock to Wright's church, 1000's who flock to Rev. Meek's church a few miles south of Trinity, several 1000's who flock to any number of churches all over Chicago and elsewhere every Sunday morning. Wright doesn't speak for the entire Black community. No one person does. That's my point.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:18 am
the we agree because that's what I said.... so why am I ignorant but you're not?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:21 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
the we agree because that's what I said.... so why am I ignorant but you're not?


Because you took what eoe said and it turned it into "Wright speaks for the black community and that other guy was Tommin". In two sequential posts you managed to put "uncle Tom" and "you're a racist" in eoe's mouth.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:43 am
because that's exactly how she came on.... with the insinuation that the thousands who attend wrights church somehow validated him.... and then the rolling eyes.... were you thinking I wouldn't respond in kind?

I didn't start the snarkiness... I was trying to be serious and objective....
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:45 am
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
A pastor on Morning Joe this morning was speaking about how Wright was absolutely not representative of the black church or the beliefs of the black community. He said Wrights rhetoric was very 45 year old black Nationalistic and no longer had any place or influence in the black community.


Tell that to the 1000's who flock to Trinity every Sunday morning. Rolling Eyes


So you think Wright represents and speaks for the black community?

so the other guy was Tomming?


This is how people expose their ignorance...
No ONE PERSON speaks for the ENTIRE Black community.


Allow me to illustrate the misunderstanding. Eoe was responding to the bolded sentence and my interpretation was that the eye roll was to the person you were quoting, not to you.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:52 am
spin it as you like...
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 11:26 am
IMO, it was a mistake not to distance himself from Wright sooner.

The "radical preacher" link has sunk far too many campaigns.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
spin it as you like...


Spin it? I read it sequentially, linearly, if you will. You'd have to spin it to take what you took from it. I realize you don't see it the same. Or you realize it was a misunderstanding but don't have the balls to say so.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 12:25 pm
DrewDad wrote:
The "radical preacher" link has sunk far too many campaigns.


Like McCain's?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 04:53:29