1
   

Obama Gets His Hands Dirty

 
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 08:53 am
maporsche wrote:
engineer wrote:
sozobe wrote:

Not a deity though.

None of us supporting Obama have ever said that. .


NO Obama supporters? Zero? Really?

Nope. No walking on water that I can find. Saying a politician is trying to stay out of the ooze that surrounds our usual campaigns or saying he is a breath of fresh air is a far cry from saying he's a saint. (But if you find someone who thinks Obama is a deity, post the link and I'll conceed the point. Very Happy )
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 08:56 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
but progress has been made.... some see the glass as half empty.... some as half full...


So you and Obama are in agreement.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:00 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
the anti obama crowd as you say are, when using the term messiah, referring to the near religious fervor which many Obama supporters treat him with..... and you know that...thanks for your patience...

But "near religious fervor" is your term. They like to be "for" their candidate instead of "against" the other guy or voting for the "lesser of two evils." You are for you candidate. You were frothing a few months ago about the treatment she was getting in the press, etc, yet you don't worship her. If some of Obama's supporters are inspired by him, great. Some of Clinton's supporters are equally inspired. I've seen them praising her to the heavens on TV. Maybe McCain has inspired someone as well. Still, I don't see the "near religious fervor."
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:01 am
FreeDuck wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
but progress has been made.... some see the glass as half empty.... some as half full...


So you and Obama are in agreement.


on this issue we are in agreement...
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:11 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
A pastor on Morning Joe this morning was speaking about how Wright was absolutely not representative of the black church or the beliefs of the black community. He said Wrights rhetoric was very 45 year old black Nationalistic and no longer had any place or influence in the black community.


Tell that to the 1000's who flock to Trinity every Sunday morning. Rolling Eyes


So you think Wright represents and speaks for the black community?

so the other guy was Tomming?


This is how people expose their ignorance...
No ONE PERSON speaks for the ENTIRE Black community.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:12 am
and I indicated I believed that any ONE person speaks for the black community and exposed my ignorance where exactly?
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:14 am
If I have to point it out to you, then that says a whole lot more.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:23 am
ahhh... so it's official... I'm a racist?
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:25 am
eoe wrote:
If I have to point it out to you, then that says a whole lot more.


.....about your inability to make a point?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:38 am
Obama Distorted Rev. Wright's Background

Monday, April 28, 2008 9:39 AM

By: Ronald Kessler


In an interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday, Barack Obama again fabricated the background of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright to try to excuse his longtime pastor's denunciations of America and of whites.

Referring to racial discrimination, violence, and segregation, Obama said Wright "went through experiences that I never went through."

In his speech on race in Philadelphia, Obama made similar claims. He described a "lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one's family . . ."

Obama said this was "the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up . . . For the men and women of Reverend Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years."

But as detailed in an April 13 Newsman article, "Obama's Rev. Wright Mythology," Obama's characterization of his mentor's upbringing is untrue.

Wright grew up in a racially mixed, middle-class section of Philadelphia called Germantown, which consisted of homes on broad tree-lined streets. Both his parents had good jobs: His father was a pastor; his mother was vice principal of Philadelphia High School for Girls.

Wright was privileged to attend the elite Central High School, which admits only the most highly-qualified applicants from all over the city. When Wright attended Central High, the student body was 90 percent white, according to students who attended at around the same time.

Wright's classmates clearly respected him. The 211th class yearbook described him as the "epitome of what Central endeavors to imbue in its students."

In contrast to Wright, Bill Cosby, who also attended Central High, has denounced the black culture of victimhood that Wright has promoted in his sermons, a culture that Cosby says sets up blacks for failure.

Since the Newsmax story on Wright's background ran, only Fox News' Bill O'Reilly has picked up on the fact that Obama's characterization of his preacher's upbringing is fiction.

Meanwhile, the coverage resurgence of Wright over the weekend spotlights the fact that, by suppressing any mention of Wright until mid-March, the media in effect selected Obama as the Democrats' nominee.

Wright appeared in a Bill Moyers interview on Friday, gave a talk to the NAACP in Detroit on Sunday, and spoke to the National Press Club this morning. As a result, clips of Wright denouncing America and claiming the country introduced the AIDS virus to kill off blacks have been blanketing the airwaves.

Moreover, at the NAACP, Wright in effect ratified the black culture of failure by saying African-Americans' brains are different than those of whites: If they speak differently from whites, they are not wrong ?- just different, he said, implying that they should not be corrected.

If the Obama-loving media had picked up on stories that Newsmax started running in January before the primaries began about Obama and his relationship with his pastor, Hillary Clinton undoubtedly would be ahead today in delegates and votes.

After the media finally ran the stories, Obama's double-digit lead over Clinton in national polls vanished. At the same time, John McCain shot up in the polls.


As Ken Blackwell, a black columnist, recently wrote, the media have covered Obama "as if he were in a beauty pageant." In doing so, they have done a disservice to Democrats by not telling the truth about Obama and his pastor until most of the primaries were over.

By not reporting how Obama is using bogus claims about Wright's upbringing to excuse his "God damn America" tirades, the media are continuing the coverup.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:55 am
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
A pastor on Morning Joe this morning was speaking about how Wright was absolutely not representative of the black church or the beliefs of the black community. He said Wrights rhetoric was very 45 year old black Nationalistic and no longer had any place or influence in the black community.


Tell that to the 1000's who flock to Trinity every Sunday morning. Rolling Eyes


So you think Wright represents and speaks for the black community?

so the other guy was Tomming?


This is how people expose their ignorance...
No ONE PERSON speaks for the ENTIRE Black community.


I must be really ignorant, cause I don't see the point either.

A couple thousand attending a church is still only a fraction of the population.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:06 am
That's right. There are 1000's who flock to Wright's church, 1000's who flock to Rev. Meek's church a few miles south of Trinity, several 1000's who flock to any number of churches all over Chicago and elsewhere every Sunday morning. Wright doesn't speak for the entire Black community. No one person does. That's my point.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:18 am
the we agree because that's what I said.... so why am I ignorant but you're not?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:21 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
the we agree because that's what I said.... so why am I ignorant but you're not?


Because you took what eoe said and it turned it into "Wright speaks for the black community and that other guy was Tommin". In two sequential posts you managed to put "uncle Tom" and "you're a racist" in eoe's mouth.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:43 am
because that's exactly how she came on.... with the insinuation that the thousands who attend wrights church somehow validated him.... and then the rolling eyes.... were you thinking I wouldn't respond in kind?

I didn't start the snarkiness... I was trying to be serious and objective....
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:45 am
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
eoe wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
A pastor on Morning Joe this morning was speaking about how Wright was absolutely not representative of the black church or the beliefs of the black community. He said Wrights rhetoric was very 45 year old black Nationalistic and no longer had any place or influence in the black community.


Tell that to the 1000's who flock to Trinity every Sunday morning. Rolling Eyes


So you think Wright represents and speaks for the black community?

so the other guy was Tomming?


This is how people expose their ignorance...
No ONE PERSON speaks for the ENTIRE Black community.


Allow me to illustrate the misunderstanding. Eoe was responding to the bolded sentence and my interpretation was that the eye roll was to the person you were quoting, not to you.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 10:52 am
spin it as you like...
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 11:26 am
IMO, it was a mistake not to distance himself from Wright sooner.

The "radical preacher" link has sunk far too many campaigns.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
spin it as you like...


Spin it? I read it sequentially, linearly, if you will. You'd have to spin it to take what you took from it. I realize you don't see it the same. Or you realize it was a misunderstanding but don't have the balls to say so.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 12:25 pm
DrewDad wrote:
The "radical preacher" link has sunk far too many campaigns.


Like McCain's?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/26/2026 at 09:39:32