engineer wrote:
I think you mis-read this. Obama said that the roots of black racial animosity stem from their historical treatment. The purpose of his speech was to discuss racial intolerance, both white of black and vica versa. He said a history of oppression has led to people like the good reverand who tend to see the oppressor's hand everywhere.
I am glad to discuss your points with you. You mentioned he was merely explaining the roots of the Rev. Wright's sentiments. But wouldn't you agree that by equating the "anger", "legacy of defeat", and "oppression" of the past with the problems of the present he has created a justification for many less educated and intelligent individuals to relieve themselves of blame for their own personal choices?
engineer wrote:Rev. Wright's comments, while bigoted, are not really all that incendary. You will find them posted on A2K regularly.
What does that say about those who post that on A2K?
engineer wrote:
But Obama makes a key point: You can disagree with the comments and still love and respect the person. As a Southern of similar age to Obama, I have listened to relatives and in-laws make casually racist comments and cringed. Of course they back away when challenged, but I know exactly what Obama refers to. His point was that the races are still polarized, the behavior of Rev. Wright is not atypical in the US and that you can reject that behavior without rejecting the person.
I think this point of yours is powerful. And I agree with it. You are completely right about those in our lives that have outrageous views, yet we don't disown them completely as people. But, as in your case you mentioned relatives and in-laws. It is not your choice of association. You didn't get to choose your relatives, or marry your wife based on hers. Obama chose his pastor. He chose to continue to seek his counsel, guidance, blessings, and mentorship for 20 years. And this is the man who wants to be Patriot-in-Chief.
He condemns Hillary Clinton for voting for the Iraq War, when all of the evidence at the time supported her vote (remember "slam dunk" comment). But, that choice pales in comparison for voluntarily and enthusiastically embracing a person of such bigoted, uninformed, and fanatical nature.
If it were a white politician who frequented a Klan church for 20 years he would be lynched by the media and the electorate.
Would he not?