0
   

What's the prostitute look like?

 
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:02 pm
Ragman wrote:
she could be headless for all that it matters to her clients. B'sides, I see nothing wrong with her nose.



WTF? That is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo wrong. We are not talking about crack whores. The girls have to be gorgeous.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:04 pm
Mame wrote:
hawkeye10 wrote:
Ragman wrote:
she could be headless for all that it matters to her clients. B'sides, I see nothing wrong with her nose.


No sir, there have been a slew of stories in the last week about how these high powered guys spend a wad of cash on prostitutes, and then half the time only get a BJ or just want to talk with them. It seems that a lot of these guys simply want a good looking woman to be nice to them, they can't get that at home.

Sounds like Spitz wants full on sex though


What guys can't get a good looking woman to be nice to them at home? And why do you suppose that is? Are they a$$holes or something?


As if what these idiots say on TV has anything to do with reality.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:06 pm
Roxxxane, your avatar is looking good. Are you on some sort of health kick?

Keep it up, girl.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:06 pm
spendius wrote:
You're the wrong way round. She could have been bodiless. At those prices it is the head that matters. Bodies are about $30 I believe.


I am sure the pun wasn't intended but it is the head that matters. Unquestionably.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:10 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Roxxxane, your avatar is looking good. Are you on some sort of health kick?

Keep it up, girl.


Fortunately for me, my main obligation these days is maintaining an attractive appearance. I work out almost every day and restrict myself to healthy foods. And, most importantly, don't drink, smoke or do drugs.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:10 pm
And one more question, Roxxxane: Is the passion between you and Spendius reaching such a level as to concern the A2K crowd?

Ok, how can I put this in simpler terms?

Are you banging him, Rox? Are you wasting your beautiful body on that despicable clown?

Spare me.

Tell me it isn't so.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:12 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Roxxxane, your avatar is looking good. Are you on some sort of health kick?

Keep it up, girl.


Fortunately for me, my main obligation these days is maintaining an attractive appearance. I work out almost every day and restrict myself to healthy foods. And, most importantly, don't drink, smoke or do drugs.


I can understand the refraining from drink and smoke, but drugs?

I guess we all have our priorities.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:23 pm
Mame wrote:


What guys can't get a good looking woman to be nice to them at home? And why do you suppose that is? Are they a$$holes or something?


Maybe, or maybe their wives don't know how to satisfy a man. The question needs to be asked; what have women done to create a market where guys value primo female companionship at $45,000 a week?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/nyregion/16call.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&sq=prostitutes,%20respect&st=nyt&scp=2
Or even $1,000 a hour?? The market is there, top of the line prostitutes get that kind of money so the value of what they provide must be $1000 a hour plus. Seems like wive's might want to consider providing the service themselves rather than have their husbands contract out for it.
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:27 pm
Maybe their husbands are a$$holes and they don't want to be intimate with them???

Maybe the husbands just like a variety????

Maybe the husbands are DRUNK and can't get it UP?????

Maybe the husbands never go home???

Lots of reasons why a normal woman wouldn't want to 'service' their man, but we don't really know WHY these men want to visit a prosty, do we?

Maybe they are into kinky?

Maybe they find it a thrill?

Who knows? But why do you always blame the wife????

Is this personal with you or what?
0 Replies
 
JustBrooke
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:31 pm
hawkeye10 wrote:



Maybe, or maybe their wives don't know how to satisfy a man. Seems like wive's might want to consider providing the service themselves rather than have their husbands contract out for it.


Oh for f*ck sakes!

That is the most idiotic thing I have heard you say.......and you have said plenty on this forum.

WTF
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:35 pm
Mame wrote:
Maybe the husbands are DRUNK and can't get it UP?????


Little too much emphasis there, lady.

Care to start over?
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:36 pm
<pats Mame on head --comforts her and eyes her cleavage>
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:37 pm
Sorry to get emotional, gus. <snuggles up, pushes cleavage into gus' strong, manly chest> - hold me!
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:46 pm
Mame wrote:
Is this personal with you or what?


No, my wife is a fabulous f*ck. I never look for more. I do find it amusing that women have so screwed things up that those individual women who get what men want are so richly rewarded as they are now. Prostitutes were once more respected by other women than they are today, modern women need to wake up and smell the coffee, need to figure out what makes prostitutes so valuable. Good prostitutes believe that they are in a rewarding line of work, their customers highly value them and believe that they get good value even at the rates they are charged. Maybe, just maybe, prostitutes and their johns are not delusional. Maybe the "modern woman" has missed something important about the relationship between man and woman, something that good prostitutes "get". Instead of bringing in yet another woman CEO to speak to the women's empowerment group maybe a successful prostitute should be invited instead.
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:48 pm
I think I'll just stop listening to you instead.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:48 pm
Mame wrote:
Sorry to get emotional, gus. <snuggles up, pushes cleavage into gus' strong, manly chest> - hold me!


<ejaculates>
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:49 pm
How the hell else could I respond to such a statement?
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:49 pm
What??! Already?!


Geez Louise!
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:50 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
How the hell else could I respond to such a statement?


Can you fake emotion?
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:50 pm
You're quicker than I am.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 07:53:01