@ican711nm,
Why Has Parker Griffin changed to the Republican Party? His party is currently in the Majority in Congress along with a radical leftist Democrat in the White House. Perhaps those who consider themselves Democrats/Progressives/Liberals would indulge us with an answer.
But the important question for MACs is whether Griffin should be trusted at all. I say no. CWDP (Conservatives With Deep Principles) must remember that Griffin voted with Pelosi et al 80% of the time. Better to find a proven native conservative candidate if possible and sink resources into his/ her campaign. Forget anybody, whether an R or D designate, that has not demonstrated consistent conservative (fiscally responsible) economic principles in their total voting record. The Republican Party has let us Americans down, first under Tom Delay, then George Bush, and now their (Mitch McConnell et al) failure to stall this socialistic assault on individual rights and liberties on all Americans which is now proceeding under the guise of "Health Care Reform".
Sen. McConnell's strategy of proposing "messaging amendments" has been an unmitigated failure and has only allowed the statist Reid to ignore those 'messages' by buying off one unprincipled Democratic Senator after the other and put the lie to the belief that the term 'Unprincipled Democrat' some how implies a real world dichotomy in the democratic party regarding those who are principled and those who are not.
The MMM and Democratic operatives have pointed to the 'revolution' in the Republican Party. However, the real battle is between MACs (true fiscal conservatives and political Objectivists--see Ayn Rand @
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=arc_ayn_rand_the_nature_of_government and
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=arc_ayn_rand_man_rights ) and their fellow American Statists (essentially Marxists), whether Democratic or Republican (many mainstream Repubs think moderates only will win elections and therefore move left). Who wins will determine the destiny of the United States of America. Honestly, if conservatives-- real conservatives,--do not win a majority in the coming 2010 elections I feel the U.S will become, ultimately, Europe. This does not initially seem so bad to the uninformed, but all those who still are fans of independent thinking should ask and answer these questions:
Who pulled Europe’s and USSR's chestnuts out of the WWII fire?
Who was wealthy enough to execute Marshall-type plans in both theaters of WWII when peace ensued?
Who pulled Europe's chestnuts out from under the Cold War steamroller known as the U.S.S.R?
And how was this possible? From whence came such wealth?
A further observation should be the EU’s degrading socialism, anti-business policies and resultant inability to field a security force, even to defend itself.
I contend that, without our American forefather’s research into past governing systems and their careful crafting of our now increasingly ignored constitution along with their economic laissez-fairest policies, the above questions would have been impossible to even conceive of, let alone answer with current history.
Given the real world, America is the global resident's first and, probably, last chance at a political system that promotes individual rights and, consequently, personal freedom. This does not mean that there can’t be some compromise with those that think strict Conservatism and Laissez-Faireism is too cold or inhumane but such compromises must always lean rightward towards individual rights and away from their violation. Given the Left's (See Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals") actions in history I would consul against even this.
JM