55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 11:33 am
@ican711nm,
tens of millions are calling on the impeachment of Obama? Tens of millions would mean at least 1 out of every 30 people would be calling for Obama's impeachment.

I don't think so. Maybe a few thousand and only in the company of others that are as big of idiots as them. No one at the coffee shops I know would be stupid enough to make such a statement. They would be razzed for days for it.

Foxfyre
 
  2  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 11:43 am
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/holb090708_cmyk20090707023523.jpg

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/sk0707d20090707020201.jpg

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/lb0708cd20090707021022.jpg
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 11:48 am
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:
My perception of reality is in fact shared by tens of millions of our fellow Americans.

That's a depressing thought.
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:34 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
tens of millions are calling on the impeachment of Obama? Tens of millions would mean at least 1 out of every 30 people would be calling for Obama's impeachment.

Let's say tens of millions Americans equals 30 million Americans. That's a little less than 10% of America's population.

OBAMA IS ACTING IN VIOLATION OF USA LAW TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVES WHICH VIOLATE USA LAW.
The solution for how to save our Constitutional Republic is to first impeach President Obama, or initiate his removal from the presidency some other lawful way. He is violating the Constitution of the USA that he swore to support. He is leading the transfer of private property from those persons and from those organizations who have lawfully earned it to those persons and organizations who have not lawfully earned it.

parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:42 pm
@ican711nm,
That would mean 1 out of 10 people would be calling for Obama's impeachment ican. Of the 300 or more people I interact with on a weekly basis, you are the only one acting like such an idiot.

I contend you are one of a fringe element of a few thousand.
Lightwizard
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:45 pm
@parados,
I wager the call to impeach the idiot W was a much higher percentage, except that he deserved it -- the reasons were not imagined. He'll get his in the history books and I'm sure he's made the bottom ten of the worst Presidents in American history already.
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:50 pm
@ican711nm,
Obama said,"... generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state governement must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted."

Obama is wrong. Generally the Constitution says what the federal government can do AND what it must do for you. It also says what the federal government can't do to you AND what the federal government can't do for you.

Quote:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Foxfyre
 
  2  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:54 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

Obama said,"... generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state governement must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted."

Obama is wrong. Generally the Constitution says what the federal government can do AND what it must do for you. It also says what the federal government can't do to you AND what the federal government can't do for you.

Quote:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.



The Ninth and Tenth Amendments mean absolutely nothing today as Americans have developed a level of naive trust for Congress, the White House and the U.S. Supreme Court that would have astonished the founders, a trust that will lead to our undoing as a great nation.
http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/09/WhyABillOfRights.htm
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:57 pm
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
My perception of reality is in fact shared by tens of millions of our fellow Americans.

That's a depressing thought.


That's only a depressing thought for parasitical and envidious people.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:59 pm
Surely, he is the Auntie Christ
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 02:21 pm
@Lightwizard,
From Wiki:

Quote:
Quinnipiac University poll

A Quinnipiac University poll, taken May 23"30, 2006, asked 1,534 registered American voters to pick the worst U.S. President of the last 61 years.[14]

"Which of these eleven presidents we have had since World War II would you consider the worst president"Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Senior, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush?"

1. George W. Bush (34%)
2. Richard Nixon (17%)
3. Bill Clinton (16%)
4. Jimmy Carter (13%)
5. Don't Know/No Answer (5%)
6. Lyndon Johnson (4%)
7. George H. W. Bush (3%)
8. Ronald Reagan (3%)
9. Gerald Ford (2%)
10. Harry Truman (1%)
11. John Kennedy (1%)
12. Dwight Eisenhower (<1%)

[\quote]


What I find most interesting about this poll is the simple fact that Bill Clinton received 16% of the votes for worst president, but it seems to me at least that their vote was based on his promiscuity rather than his achievements as our president.





0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 07:25 pm
The ironies of politics:

4:15 AM - Tuesday - July 7, 2009
Quote:
"The future does not belong to those who gather armies on a field of battle or bury missiles in the ground."--President Obama calling on the U.S. and Russia to overcome Cold War mistrust and reduce nuclear arsenals, in his commencement speech before graduates of Moscow's New Economic School.
http://www.time.com/time/quotes/0,26174,1908976,00.html?xid=rss-quotes


7:45 am - Tuesday - July 7, 2009
Quote:
ISLAMABAD (AP) - Suspected U.S. missiles and Pakistani fighter jets attacked followers of a notorious militant leader close to the Afghan border Tuesday, but the army complained the American strikes were hurting its campaign against the country's public enemy No. 1.

Between 12 and 14 militants were killed when two missiles hit a training camp run by Pakistani Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud in South Waziristan tribal region, intelligence officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to media. The missiles were believed fired by American drones.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D999MAIO0&show_article=1
Diest TKO
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 03:43 am
@Foxfyre,
What is ironic? Don't you want us to fight those Taliban forces?

T
K
O
parados
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 06:49 am
@Diest TKO,
I think the irony is that Fox can't tell the difference between the future and the present.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 06:58 am
Re future, present and past... here's why uranium mining and environmental concerns are topics of minimal importance except as regards their influence on standard of living... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtzJhTfQiMA&amp;eurl=http://crooksandliars.com/&amp;feature=player_embedded
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 07:09 am
And, how's the tea bag thing going, guys?
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 08:26 am
@blatham,
Still stormy in the tea cup, I suppose.

http://www.kandles.co.uk/teapots/images//teapots/Storm_in_a_Teacup_Teapot.jpg
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  2  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 09:10 am
@Foxfyre,
Hi, Foxfyre. Have you seen today's Rasmussen, with Obama down 5? Maybe there is hope before this guy completely destroys the country? But how do we undo these stupid treaties wherein Obama is destroying our national defense capabilities, after he is out of office?

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/var/plain/storage/images/media/images/obama_index_0708/231106-1-eng-US/obama_index_0708.jpg
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 09:16 am
@okie,
The problem you "people" have is the simple fact that you have not provided evidence "how Obama has destroyed our country."

Your claims are without any basis in fact; they are all fiction!
okie
 
  2  
Reply Wed 8 Jul, 2009 09:18 am
@cicerone imposter,
The evidence is all around you, ci. Your own state is going broke, or has been broke for a long time, even before Obama, due to liberal policies. Open your eyes.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 07:30:24