@Cycloptichorn,
There have been numerous cases of violations of the 4th amendment, but not as you seem to be suggesting.
In Kansas (during the Carter administration), the IRS accused a contractor of tax violations. His files and bank accounts were seized or frozen and IRS agents started asking questions of the contractor's friends, employees, associates, customers, and suppliers. Both customers and suppliers became nervous as to whether the contractor would complete the work and/or pay his financial obligations and bailed out. Then, after the contractor's reputation and finances were in shambles and he was effectively ruined, the government informed him that whoops, no tax violations. Forget the whole thing. Was he compensated for the financial and personal grief the government brought down on him? Nope.
About that same time a fisherman working in the gulf was suspected of drug trafficking and his boat, full of fish, was impounded. For several longs months those fish rotted in the hold and the fisherman was denied his means of supporting himself, until finally the DEA dismissed all charges and released the now ruined boat, as it turned out, to the bankruptcy court. Was the fisherman compensated for the error? Nope.
That kind of thing every responsible American should be railing against and demanding correction.
The government taking whatever means it needs to take to protect us against those who would do the worst kind of violence to our persons and our property is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment, however, and is a Constitutionally mandated function of government. Unless you can identify a single person who has incurred any harm or violation of privacy as a result of those actions, or unless you can point to a single criminal charge that anybody was able to make stick, there is simply no case for a Fourth Amendment violation there.
