@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:Quote:Quote:[quote="Walter Hinteler"
okie wrote:There is a vast world of difference between me and the citizens of Germany. People are still being duped, cyclops, such as leftists are still claiming Obama is a centrist.
What and why do you mean that we Germans are being duped and you are better?
Cyclops accused me of being duped by the Nazis, like the people of Germany were, so I corrected him. He wasn't talking about the Germans today.
No, he wasn't. But you were, since you definitely wrote that above quote.
Are you implying that you think Obama is a centrist, Walter?
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:Cycloptichorn wrote: You take the Propaganda of the Nazis as fact - you believe that's what they actually believed. Just in the same way that the German citizens of the time did.
Those 25 points, okie always refers to, were more or less unknown to ... well, more than 90% of the German population of that time period.
I doubt if more than 10% of Americans have the slightest clue of what was in the Democratic platform in 2008 either, but does that make it any less informative or pertinent?
@okie,
okie wrote:Are you implying that you think Obama is a centrist, Walter?
Here, in Europe, he would be center-right.
But he's the president of the USA, he certainly is left of the Republicans ... very easy, isn't it, since you've just two major parties and only those two in all parliaments ....
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote: It is truly baffling to see such anti-intellectualism in action.
when intellectualism produces obviously illogical results, yes, I am somewhat anti-intellectual, but pro-common sense.
@okie,
okie wrote:I doubt if more than 10% of Americans have the slightest clue of what was in the Democratic platform in 2008 either, but does that make it any less informative or pertinent?
I did neither refer to that nor wanted to give an opinion about a less or more informative or pertinent platform but was adding a comment to cyclo's response.
Sorry that you misunderstood my bad English, okie.
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter,
Even in America he is a centrist, except with dopes who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground!
@BillW,
No he is right of center. A Clinton big business democrat.
Revealing posts. There are now 3 posters that are claiming Obama is a centrist or to the right of center. Obviously, this probably explains why the liberal world would think Hitler and Fascism was to the right. The explanation is that their scale of measurement is totally in left field. I guess anything to the right of communism or Marxism is right wing according to some people? All of this defies the fact that Obama had as a Senator the most liberal voting record in 2007, apparently voting liberal or left on 65 of his 66 votes, plus the fact he has appointed Marxist leaning folks to his administration, and had several relationships with those types before he became president, I guess none of that matters to liberals.
This reminds me of reading Obama's book, Audacity of Hope. The guy constantly framed himself as somebody above the fray, an all seeing arbitor of both sides. He seldom would take a position on any of the issues in his book, in a definite way. Non-committal would be the word. At the time I read the book, it was quite frustrating to me, because I bought the book to try to understand what the guy believed, but the book was not much help. I was left to read between the lines and make judgements of a person that is not at all an open book. All the book did was raise my suspicions as to how radical the guy might be, and I now believe he is very radical at his core. I also remember people commonly asking "who is Obama," and I believe to this day he has not actually told the country he serves what exactly he really believes. In contrast, a Ronald Reagan told us in no uncertain terms what he believed and why. The same with Bush. Whether you agreed with him or not, at least he told us who he was, what he was going to do, and why. That deserves respect.
It all depends upon ones frame of reference. If you think Fascism was an extreme right wing ideology, no wonder some people might think Obama is on the right.
@okie,
Quote:as I have pointed out, nobody needs to swallow so-called "conventional wisdom" put out there by liberal professors and authors if simple common sense says otherwise
ME, me, mmmmeeeeeee!! I said it, okie screams, therefore, it is true!
What about all those liberal scientists?
Besides, those professors that you scorn actually speak and read several languages and have studied the subject while you just make things up.
Common sense is your fall back. You have no common sense. You have no intellect either. How you get by is a mystery.
What will happen to the irrational progressive liberal left beyond 2010?
@okie,
okie wrote:
Revealing posts. There are now 3 posters that are claiming Obama is a centrist or to the right of center.
They are parroting talking points sent to them by Soros.
@okie,
okie wrote:
Quote:yes, I am somewhat anti-intellectual, but pro-common sense.
Thanks for my laugh for the day, and I'm in GOA, India. ROFLMAO
@okie,
Quote:You have identified the problem, george, but as I have pointed out, nobody needs to swallow so-called "conventional wisdom" put out there by liberal professors and authors if simple common sense says otherwise.
And no one has to accept that a mallard is a duck just because some liberal professors and zoologists say it is. But if you want to call it an eagle okie, you have to expect to be called out on it.
If you want to not swallow that a mallard is a duck and that Fascism is on the right side of any political spectrum, go ahead. But don't expect your claim to be accepted as "common sense."
Then again, if you accept Beck and Limpbag as your source of truth, then accept the fact you are dumb!
@parados,
parados wrote:Quote:You have identified the problem, george, but as I have pointed out, nobody needs to swallow so-called "conventional wisdom" put out there by liberal professors and authors if simple common sense says otherwise.
And no one has to accept that a mallard is a duck just because some liberal professors and zoologists say it is. But if you want to call it an eagle okie, you have to expect to be called out on it.
If you want to not swallow that a mallard is a duck and that Fascism is on the right side of any political spectrum, go ahead. But don't expect your claim to be accepted as "common sense."
You've got the analogy wrong. Intelligentsia has attempted the same as call a Mallard duck an eagle. It is not an eagle. If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it is probably a duck. Fascism walks like leftists, sounds like leftists, and so logic says it is.
As I've also used the analogy, if you cross a donkey with a horse, the result is a mule, not a horse.
@BillW,
Judging from your posts, they have more sense than you make, Bill.
@okie,
okie wrote:
As I've also used the analogy, if you cross a donkey with a horse, the result is a mule, not a horse.
Which might certainly be a hinny - depending on ....