55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 06:13 pm
@okie,
I know what you are - the guy working the oil drills. They make a lot of money out of proportion of their skills. Mr. Green 2 Cents Drunk
okie
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 06:42 pm
@talk72000,
Try it sometime if you think its easy money and a walk in the park.

By the way, I worked in the minerals exploration business anyway, not oil. We did a little with tar sands and oil shale, but thats it as far as oil is concerned. I did work with a bunch of old oil patch people, both engineers and geologists, and you could not find a greater bunch of people, hardworking and good Americans.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 06:59 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:

Quote:
I can tell you from observation and my reading of history, oe, Hitler was certainly no conservative or right wing guy

You're seeking out people like J.J. Ray or Jonah Goldberg - people who have zero authority as historians, but echo your political views - to tell you a revisionist version of history. Your worldview doesn't allow for anything as ugly as National Socialism being associated with your beloved right-wing policies. Therefore you ignore what historians and even fellow conservatives on this forum - people like High Seas, Asherman or GeorgeOB - tell you and rather rely on revisionist interpretations of history, so you can feel safe in the belief that all evil arises from the political left.

Haven't seen any posts from Asherman lately, hope hes okay. High Seas and GeorgeOB, I respect their opinions, but they have not really engaged me in the Hitler debate, so I haven's seen any links to experts for example that they believe have the right answers.

In regard to all evil arising from the left, an interesting subject actually. As the terms left and right have evolved, I maybe do have a rather new take on the issue, I do equate the very definitions of conservative or right vs liberal or left as having virtuous vs non-virtuous principles. I believe freedom and liberty and personal responsibility are virtuous, while liberal left is non-virtuous because they advocate the taking away of freedom and responsibility in favor of the government taking care of you, even to the point of enslavement if necessary. Directly related to this very point is the conservative principle voiced in the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." The left or liberal view would be in direct contradiction to the above, because they believe liberty of the individual must be compromised to various extents in the interests of the common good.

This actually touches on one of the central reasons why Hitler was a leftist, one of the primary beliefs of the Nazis was "Common Good over Individual Good." This is I believe an evil concept, because it compromises the free will and liberty of individuals. If leaders start down that road, often the road leads them further and further into more evil, to the point of even mass murder if nessary to attain common good. After all, the individual is expendable, not only their liberty, but maybe even their lives if necessary.

I do not mean to imply that evil does not exist in a free society or under conservative government. We still need laws to govern how we treat each other, and there will still be corrupt politicians that will need to be prosecuted if found to break laws. We are a nation of laws, to protect us from each other, but hopefully we should not have to worry about being protected from government, that is if government was conservative and virtuous.
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 07:03 pm
ADOLF HITLER STARTED OUT AS A SOCIALIST, BUT EVENTUALLY EVOLVED MUCH FARTHER TO THE LEFT INTO A NAZI SEEKING ABSOLUTE POWER.
Quote:

http://www.crusader.net/texts/mk/mkv2ch01.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
Volume Two: The National Socialist Movement
Chapter I: Philosophy and Party
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ON FEBRUARY 24, 1920, the first great public demonstration of our young movement took place. In the Festsaal of the Munich Hofbräuhaus the twenty-five theses of the new party's program were submitted to a crowd of almost two thousand and every single point was accepted amid jubilant approval.

With this the first guiding principles and directives were issued for a struggle which was to do away with a veritable mass of old traditional conceptions and opinions and with unclear, yes, harmful, aims. Into the rotten and cowardly bourgeois world and into the triumphant march of the Marxist wave of conquest a new power phenomenon was entering, which at the eleventh hour would halt the chariot of doom.

It was self-evident that the new movement could hope to achieve the necessary importance and the required strength for this gigantic struggle only if it succeeded from the very first day in arousing in the hearts of its supporters the holy conviction that with it political life was to be given, not to a new election slogan, but to a new philosophy of fundamental significance.

We must bear in mind from what wretched viewpoints so-called ' party programs' are normally patched together and from time to time refurbished or remodeled. We must submit the driving motives particularly of these bourgeois 'program-commissions' to our magnifying glass, in order to achieve the necessary understanding for the evaluation of these programmatical monstrosities. It is always one sole concern which impels men to set up new programs or to change existing ones: concern for the next election. As soon as it dawns on these parliamentary 'jugglers' that the beloved people are again revolting and would like to slip out of the harness of the old party cart, they begin to repaint the shafts. Then come the stargazers and party astrologers, the so-called 'experienced," shrewd' men, old parliamentarians as a rule, who in their 'rich period of apprenticeship' can recall analogous cases when the patience of the masses had burst, and who now sense that something similar is again menacingly close. And so they take up the old prescriptions, form a 'commission,' go about listening to the voice of the beloved people, sniff at the products of the press, and thus slowly scent what the dear broad masses would like to have, what they detest and what they hope for. Every professional group, even every class of employees, is studied with the greatest precision and their most secret wishes investigated. Even the 'bad slogans' of the dangerous opposition then suddenly become ripe for examination, and, not seldom to the greatest amazement of their original inventors and disseminators, turn up, quite innocently and naturally, in the old parties' treasury of knowledge.
...
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 07:31 pm
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA VERSUS A "LIVING CONSTITUTION"

The Constitution of the USA is self-described as "the supreme law of the land." There is nothing in the Constitution of the USA as lawfully adopted and amended that says it is a "living constitution" that can be amended by judicial, presidential, and/or congressional opinions or judgments. Also, there is nothing in the Constitution of the USA as lawfully amended that says it shall eventually become obsolete and no longer require being amended according to Article V. The Constitution says in Article V how it can be lawfully amended. There are no other lawful ways to amend the Constitution.

The Constitution was first adopted by 9 states on March 4, 1789 and soon thereafter by the rest of the 13 states. So far the Constitution has been lawfully amended 27 times. It was first lawfully amended on December 15, 1791, when the first ten amendments were ratified. It was last amended when the 27th Amendment was ratified on May 7, 1992.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 08:10 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

ON FEBRUARY 24, 1920, the first great public demonstration of our young movement took place. In the Festsaal of the Munich Hofbräuhaus the twenty-five theses of the new party's program were submitted to a crowd of almost two thousand and every single point was accepted amid jubilant approval. ...

But ican, we are supposed to believe the Nazi 25 points are meaningless, that Hitler did not do those things anyway, according to the liberal historical experts here anyway. I think that is one reason why libs here don't like the idea of debating or examining the 25 points and making judgements about whether they were left or right in nature. They especially dismiss one of the main points, "Common good before Individual Good." And we are supposed to believe that Hitler murdering those millions of Jews did not have anything to do with Hitler's view that the common good of Germany depended in part on getting rid of the Jews that had polluted the country with their greedy capitalism.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 08:16 pm
@okie,
How many times must you be told that those 25 points are meaningless from the simple conclusion that he didn't follow them. It's his actions that count; not what he said.

Killer: I didn't kill my wife.
Police: But there are several eye-witnesses that said you killed her.
Killer: But I promised to treat my wife to respect and love as my wedding vows.

Police: Okay, your words are important in this matter.
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 08:22 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I've tried to talk about his actions, to no avail with you guys, because you realize his actions were also leftist, such as confiscating property, nationalizing businesses, and placing the State in charge of all kinds of things, all of which are leftist. And I just pointed out that he murdered millions of Jews for the common good of the folks, certainly part of the leftie idealogy, ci. He railed against greedy capitalist Jews, certainly not a conservative philosophy, and all of his murders were an outgrowth of that philosophy.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 08:56 pm
@okie,
Those are all your personal opinions. As I've said many times before, your personal opinions are worth **** around a2k; you don't provide evidence and credible sources for your opinions. Show us some credible historians who agrees with your Hitler=leftist ideas.

You are not a historian by any stretch of anyone's imagination. You can't even remember current events correctly.

Do you even know what a personal opinion is? I'm beginning to wonder.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 09:18 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
I think that is one reason why libs here don't like the idea of debating or examining the 25 points and making judgements about whether they were left or right in nature. They especially dismiss one of the main points, "Common good before Individual Good." And we are supposed to believe that Hitler murdering those millions of Jews did not have anything to do with Hitler's view that the common good of Germany depended in part on getting rid of the Jews that had polluted the country with their greedy capitalism.


Fine, okie. Let's discuss it.

But: Hitler wrote in German.
How good is your German?

Hitler wrote that in a certain time, due to some ceratin things happening in (political) Germany. How good is your knowledge of Germany past-1918?

We certainly can do this discussion in Enlish, just referring to the original German sources, of course.
Let's start with the founding of political parties past WWI. You certainly are aware of that situation in various German states, republics, kingdoms, principalities etc, aren't you?
okie
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 09:50 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

okie wrote:
I think that is one reason why libs here don't like the idea of debating or examining the 25 points and making judgements about whether they were left or right in nature. They especially dismiss one of the main points, "Common good before Individual Good." And we are supposed to believe that Hitler murdering those millions of Jews did not have anything to do with Hitler's view that the common good of Germany depended in part on getting rid of the Jews that had polluted the country with their greedy capitalism.


Fine, okie. Let's discuss it.

But: Hitler wrote in German.
How good is your German?

My German is not good. Actually, I took German in college, but learned not much because the professor spent much time singing songs to us in German, such as Oh Tannenbaum, stuff like that, and he gave us the answers for the tests. I talked to a German woman the other day in a waiting room and told her Ich verstehen sie nicht.

But, don't you think the English translations are close enough approximation of what he wrote? After all, it wouldn't change the entire meaning of what he wrote, would it? Surely you aren't going to try to claim English translations are totally bogus and no good?

Quote:
Hitler wrote that in a certain time, due to some ceratin things happening in (political) Germany. How good is your knowledge of Germany past-1918?

We certainly can do this discussion in Enlish, just referring to the original German sources, of course.
Let's start with the founding of political parties past WWI. You certainly are aware of that situation in various German states, republics, kingdoms, principalities etc, aren't you?

I am not an authority on it, but I have read histories of what happened. However, I don't know why we need to get lost in too many details, Walter, to the point of not seeing the forest for the trees. In other words, I believe there are some very basic principles to leftist idealogies vs right wing or conservative idealogies, and there is no need to make it more complicated than it is. For example, one basic and over-riding principle of leftist idealogy is Common Good before Individual Good, and that is clearly one of the things that the Nazis believed and I believe tried to institute as official policy of Hitler's Germany.

You can lead the way and start the discussion if you want. Actually I would like you to make your case, and you can go into as much detail as you like. By the way, I took you off of my ignore list.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 10:05 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
However, I don't know why we need to get lost in too many details, Walter, to the point of not seeing the forest for the trees.


That's just THE point, okie. You're talking here about history. Historical facts actually.

And such can't be viewed in any other way, At least, if you want to look at seriously.
That's what you learn when you study history. At a university - be it some, which you like to cll left or right or liberal or conservative.

For me and most others this is a far too serious topic.

Yes, I do believe that one needs a lot of knowledge to do so. Especially background knowledge.

But do go on with your ... whatever it is.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 10:08 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

You can lead the way and start the discussion if you want. Actually I would like you to make your case, and you can go into as much detail as you like. By the way, I took you off of my ignore list.


Why? This has been researched and documented already by more than one.

I don't really mind of I'm on your ignore list or not - since you responded since some time to my posts that was quite obvious, though.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 10:24 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
The following statements were taken from a couple of sources. I will provide the links, but I want okie to refute these statements with reliable sources of his own.

Quote:
In early 1920, the party changed its name to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) which quickly got corrupted to 'Nazi' by both enemies and supporters alike. Hitler wrote out the party's beliefs in the so-called 25 Point Party Programme. This party programme was a curious mixture - right wing nationalism; anti-capitalism; anti-socialism; anti-wealth etc. 

This rag-bag mixture would have been laughable in normal circumstances but Germany was not in normal circumstances. The NSDAP played on the Germans hatred of the Treaty of Versailles (which it said it would ignore); the belief that Germany had been stabbed in the back. Even in its early days, the NSDAP tuned in to many peoples' emotions. However, in 1920, the party was just one of many right wing parties that seemed to exist in Germany at this time.

Up to 1923, the Nazi Party was small and noisy. Its importance was mainly in the Munich area of Bavaria. Money, or lack of it, was always a problem. The 1923 hyperinflation crisis proved to be an opportunity too good to miss for the now party leader - Hitler.
Hyperinflation ruined the middle class. The poor had little and they lost most of the little they had. The rich lost a lot but as rich people they could keep their heads above water. The middle class did not have the cash reserves of the rich but they led comfortable lives. These lives were now ruined by hyperinflation and they blamed the government.

Hitler planned to seize the most important city in the south - Munich - and to use the city as a base to launch an attack on the rest of Germany, hoping that the angered middle class would rise up in support of him throughout the nation.

Soon after the war in Munich, Hitler was recruited to join a military intelligence unit (the Press and Propaganda Department of Group Command IV of the Reichswehr), and was assigned to keep tabs on the German Worker's Party. At the time, it was comprised of only a handful of members. It was disorganized and had no program, but its members expressed a right-wing doctrine consonant with Hitler's.
[/color]

As chairman of the NSDAP, he came into contact with Ludendorff, Gottfried Feder (1883-1941), Ernst Röhm (1887-1934), and Dietrich Eckart (1868-1923), whose influence was reflected in Hitler's thought: Gottfried Feder ("Break the bond of interest"), Ernst Röhm (the concept of the "state in arms") and Dietrich Erkart (anti-communism). With the assistance of party staff, Hitler drafted a party program consisting of twenty-five points. This platform was presented at a public meeting on February 24, 1920, with over 2,000 eager participants. After hecklers were forcibly removed by Hitler supporters armed with rubber truncheons and whips, Hitler electrified the audience with his masterful demagoguery. Jews were the principal target of his diatribe. Among the 25 points more negative points were the abrogation of the Versailles Treaty, confiscating war profits, expropriating land without compensation for use by the state, revoking civil rights for Jews, and expelling those Jews who had emigrated into Germany after the war began. More appealing to the masses were no doubt his promotion of the popular welfare ("the common weal comes before individual welfare"), the right of the establishment of self-determination for all Germans and equal rights for their state, and the destruction of the "bondage of interest.
mysteryman
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Sep, 2010 10:51 pm
@talk72000,
Oh really!!!

You really think that there were no NG infantry or other ground units in Bosnia or Kosovo?

Guess what...you are WRONG!!

http://www.milvet.state.pa.us/PAO/pr/bosnia.htm

Quote:
Annville (Aug. 3, 2001) -- On behalf of Gov. Tom Ridge, the state Adjutant General, Maj. Gen. William Lynch, today announced that some 850 soldiers of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard’s 28th Infantry Division (Mechanized) have begun a year-long program to prepare for their expected mobilization in July 2002 to support the NATO-led peacekeeping operation in Bosnia.


Note the word INFANTRY.

Look, heres another one...
http://www.texnews.com/1998/2000/local/return1006.html
Quote:

“We blew through Fort Hood,” said Lt. Col. Alex Korzenewski, commander of the Abilene-based 111th Engineer Battalion. “Everybody is in great shape and spirits. We have proven that we can do a real-world mission in a peacekeeping environment.”


Surprise, another ground unit.

So as you can see, your claim that there were no NG ground units in Bosnia is wrong.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  2  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2010 06:04 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
Directly related to this very point is the conservative principle voiced in the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." The left or liberal view would be in direct contradiction to the above, because they believe liberty of the individual must be compromised to various extents in the interests of the common good.

I take it that the notion that it is permissible to detain and torture a small number of terrorism suspects in order to protect a large number of people from terrorist attacks is therefore a leftist idea.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2010 08:39 am
@cicerone imposter,
How many times must Leftist Liberals be told that those 25 points of Hitler's are NOT meaningless from the simple conclusion that Hitler DID follow them AT FIRST. Hitler's socialism evolved after he gained power to his Leftist Nazi credo and mass murdered millions.

The same kind of evolution occurred from Lenin's socialism to Lenin's communism. After Stalin took over from Lenin he mass murdered tens of millions.

It's actions that count; not what is said.

The same is true for Obama: it's his actions that count; not what he said/says.
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2010 10:52 am
@ican711nm,
Quote:

http://www.crusader.net/texts/mk/mkv2ch01.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
Volume Two: The National Socialist Movement
Chapter I: Philosophy and Party
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ON FEBRUARY 24, 1920, the first great public demonstration of our young movement took place. In the Festsaal of the Munich Hofbräuhaus the twenty-five theses of the new party's program were submitted to a crowd of almost two thousand and every single point was accepted amid jubilant approval.

With this the first guiding principles and directives were issued for a struggle which was to do away with a veritable mass of old traditional conceptions and opinions and with unclear, yes, harmful, aims. Into the rotten and cowardly bourgeois world and into the triumphant march of the Marxist wave of conquest a new power phenomenon was entering, which at the eleventh hour would halt the chariot of doom.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 15 The Right of Emergency Defense
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
ON NOVEMBER 9, 1923, in the fourth year of its existence, the National Socialist German Workers' Party was dissolved and prohibited in the whole Reich territory. Today in November, 1926, it stands again free before us, stronger and inwardly firmer than ever before.

All the persecutions of the movement and its individual leaders, all vilifications and slanders, were powerless to harm it. The correctness of its ideas, the purity of its will, its supporters' spirit of self-sacrifice, have caused it to issue from all repressions stronger than ever.
...

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2010 12:55 pm
@ican711nm,
Follow what at first? Do you know how many of the 25 points he actually lived by?

Don't you understand any logic? It's not what people write that's important in real life. It's how they act and govern.

If we must continue to point out logic to you and okie, both of you have failed the basis for intelligent debate.
ican711nm
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2010 02:53 pm
@cicerone imposter,
What were Hitler's 25 points?
Which of the 25 points did Hitler actually live by, and which did he not live by:
(1) One year before he became the head of the German Government;
(2) One year after he became the head of the German Government;
(3) Four ears after he became the head of the German Government;
(4) Eight years after he became the head of the German Government?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 01/19/2026 at 11:30:25