0
   

Born-Again Christians: Most annoying people on the planet?

 
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Mar, 2008 03:55 pm
....and the winner of the most annoying person on this thread is....
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Mar, 2008 04:14 pm
raprap wrote:
real life wrote:
raprap wrote:
eoe wrote:
JPB wrote:
...until she started a regular blessing of thanking God that we have a Christian in the White House. I had to nix the political stuff :wink:


And I'd be the first one to hold her feet to the fire on that one. My S-I-L held the same opinion and I asked her once why she thought George Bush was a Christian? Because he SAYS so??? I added what my mother had always told me. "Action speaks louder than words". And then I left it alone. I've known far too many so-called Christians who aren't even on their best behavior while inside the church so saying that you're a Christian means absolutely nothing to me. I have to see that, by your actions and the way you treat your fellow human being, to believe such a claim.

But I digress...


In general, the only POTUS in the past 50 years that lived a Christian life, is cursed as an example of a failed POTUS by those that call themselves Christians.

Rap


Nonsense.

Several Presidents have been Christians in the past 50 years.

Jimmy Carter was the first to run for office touting the fact. Perhaps that's why Dems hate Christians so, because although he was an honorable person, he was an inept President and embarrassed them greatly. He caused the loss of the White House for the next 12 years.

Christians are not the only ones who acknowledge Carter's failed performance. Not by a long shot.

Anyone old enough to remember double digit interest rates, rampant inflation and soaring unemployment of the late '70s will tell you what a lousy job he did.

After being touted by the media as unbelievably smart, a master of detail , blah blah (the same things we heard about Clinton I, the same things we used to hear about Clinton II) , Carter showed that he wasn't up to the job.

It was after Watergate, so Dems figured ANYone should be able to win the WH in 1976. They were so careless and 'looking for an outsider' to fix the Washington mess. This led them to send an inexperienced but likable fellow to do the job.

Sound familiar?

'Present' Obama is the new Jimmy Carter -- likable, but inept. An 'outsider' who can fix Washington. And after the Iraq war, ANY Democrat ought to be able to win, right?


From what I interperate you're equating Bush II to the failure of Nixon?


I'm saying Dems view their opportunity in this election cycle as much of a 'sure thing' as they did back then, yes.


raprap wrote:
BTW I said "Lived the Christian Life." None of the other so called professed Christians has walked the walk.

Perhaps Gandhi hit yhe nail on the head
Quote:
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.


Rap
In your opinion, they weren't consistent Christians.

And you base that on what exactly --

The info filtered thru the press or the time that you personally spent observing their actions?

How do you know if they 'walked the walk'?

In your opinion , Jimmy Carter 'walked the walk'.

But he also left the country in a shambles.

How does that work? Is that walking the walk?

What exactly do you mean by the term and how are you able to measure who does and doesn't?
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Mar, 2008 04:30 pm
clubhouse rules -- each chapter of the club gets to write it's own definition and denounce every other chapter as wannabes. Then they start smearing other gangs as just plain Wrong. Turf wars ensue and eventually folks start dying.

You got yer NY Crips and yer Chicago Crips and yer LA Crips and then you've got Crips vs Cobras, Folks Incorporated, Black Gangsters Disciples, Young Guns, etc.

same 'ole, same 'ole.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Mar, 2008 05:19 pm
Re: Born-Again Christians: Most annoying people on the plane
Steve 41oo wrote:
kickycan wrote:
....they still make a cake and have everybody sing "happy birthday" to Jesus on Christmas...
come on be serious nobody does that.


really?


Laughing Laughing thanks


p.s. many commiserations


My high school sweetie's family had did the Christ's birthday cake thing. They were Swedish Catholics, a rare breed for our neck of New England, and they had lots of other Christmas traditions that we poor Kerry Irish Catholics had never dreamed of. (putting evergreen branches underneath the dining table and underneath the table cloth, lighted candles on the girl's headdresses and huge platters of some kind of dried fish were some others.)

They were not big on presents, that wasn't the purpose of Christmas for them, so they were a little shocked at me giving their daughter a bracelet.
It was returned to me by the father who winked and said maybe she might like it for Valentine's.

Joe(she did) Nation
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Mar, 2008 08:02 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
....and the winner of the most annoying person on this thread is....



you talkin' to me?

http://ticklebooth.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/you-talking-to-me.jpg
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Mar, 2008 05:05 am
Chai wrote:
Quote:
You talking to me?


um. No... you hardly qualify as annoying, but that person you depicted talking to RL was spot on.

I think those people are listening to themselves more than speaking to another person. The 'witnessing' becomes a pitch for them. It's a way to reassure themselves that they have something which is real; an odd form of self-hypnosis, they are talking to you but their real focus is on themselves. It has to be because in most cases what they are saying is rejected and they have to go on believing.

And it doesn't matter what they are pushing: god, vitamins, white raisin juice, LSD -( the acid or the Church) or, as seen on FoxNews, a political slant. Just watch them operate.

They aren't disappointed in the end if they haven't brought you into the light as long as they themselves are still intact.

Joe(no pressure-I'll be lurking over here when you want to talk)Nation
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Mar, 2008 12:32 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
Chai wrote:
Quote:
You talking to me?


um. No... you hardly qualify as annoying, but that person you depicted talking to RL was spot on.

I think those people are listening to themselves more than speaking to another person. The 'witnessing' becomes a pitch for them. It's a way to reassure themselves that they have something which is real; an odd form of self-hypnosis, they are talking to you but their real focus is on themselves. It has to be because in most cases what they are saying is rejected and they have to go on believing.

And it doesn't matter what they are pushing: god, vitamins, white raisin juice, LSD -( the acid or the Church) or, as seen on FoxNews, a political slant. Just watch them operate.

They aren't disappointed in the end if they haven't brought you into the light as long as they themselves are still intact.

Joe(no pressure-I'll be lurking over here when you want to talk)Nation


Do you include yourself in the same category as one who uses speech to persuade?

If 'it doesn't matter what they are pushing' , then certainly your advocacy of your views qualifies you as one of the self hypnotized persons you describe.

Do you even think about it before you post?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/18/2025 at 03:55:05