flaja wrote:
McCain's support for fellow-adulterer John Tower when George H. W. Bush nominated Tower to be Secretary of Defense;
The reason why I believe this continued concern with who is, or is not, an adulterer, is based on ignoring one fact. Some of us are monogamous, some of us are polygamous. Just like the animal kingdom.
However, it seems that the monogamous amongst us wrote the laws relating to marriage, and even got religions to accept the parameters.
So, the polygamous amongst us do marry, but then wander sometimes. This propensity to polygamy has nothing whatsoever to do with one's moral character, truthfulness, executive ability, etc. It is a false premise to believe fidelity affects anything beyond fidelity.
Now, the response in this thread to the above thought has equated adultery to dishonesty, since married people made marriage vows. Well, there is a large population, in the entire country, of gays in the closet, leading a double life, and being quite dishonest, in effect, with all they meet, since they want to be seen as heterosexuals. This dishonesty is beyond being dishonest to one's spouse, but dishonesty to all straights. I wonder if the individuals willing to condemn the Republican McCain for supposed adultery would also condemn homosexuals in the closet? I say this because being pro-gay rights is a standard Democratic Party pronouncement, yet a large part of its gay constituency are leading a quite dishonest persona. Does anyone see the hypocrisy of many anti-McCain Democrats?