Nader '08

maporsche wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

This time around Nader is going to siphon off about 635 Democratic votes, but every vote counts.

Glad to see you back Ralph!

If Nader's message appeals to people who do not completly buy into Obama's message (or Clinton's or McCain's) then they have every right to vote for someone else.

It is not Nader's fault if people support his message and agenda.



How long have people been asking for 3rd party candidates....or talking about the problems with our 2 party system.....you know, if Obama loses and him and Bloomberg choose to run as a 3rd party, I would support that choice as well, and guarentee you I wouldn't be complaining about votes being siphoned off of Clinton.

I couldn't agree more, and I guarantee you that I am not complaining about Nader siphoning off Democratic votes --- I only wish he would siphon off more, but those days are long gone.

No one disputes the right to vote as one pleases. However, look at the damage that Nader did to the country by effectively putting Bush in office. Are you unaware of Bush's failures and destructive actions?

No one disputes the right to vote as one pleases. However, look at the damage that Nader did to the country by effectively putting Bush in office. Are you unaware of Bush's failures and destructive actions?

Advocate wrote:

No one disputes the right to vote as one pleases. However, look at the damage that Nader did to the country by effectively putting Bush in office. Are you unaware of Bush's failures and destructive actions?

No one disputes the right to votes as one pleases providing they vote as I prefer.

You never disappoint Advocate,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Advocate wrote:

No one disputes the right to vote as one pleases. However, look at the damage that Nader did to the country by effectively putting Bush in office. Are you unaware of Bush's failures and destructive actions?

No one disputes the right to votes as one pleases providing they vote as I prefer.

You never disappoint Advocate,

Your post is a bit witless. Keep your day job.

would clinton or obama supporters show me where nader is wrong when he points out that the democrats and republicans are simply two parts of the national business party separated mostly by the abortion issue.

nader's politics ought to be the ones on which the democrats run, but they aren't, so i don't give a damned about the democrats anymore.

the democrats have held both houses of congress for over 14 months and we haven't seen them do a damned thing about iraq, and now the president spits in their face with recent epa rulings. so what was the point of electing democrats when they act like republicans?

Truly, is it the same old people that need me to teach them CI?

1st lesson, the suspending of habeas corpus is not democracy, it is a tool of fascist. Shame on the rightwing, shame, shame, shame

BillW wrote:

Truly, is it the same old people that need me to teach them CI?

1st lesson, the suspending of habeas corpus is not democracy, it is a tool of fascist. Shame on the rightwing, shame, shame, shame

Did FDR give German and Japanese POWs a lawyer and their day in an American court?

Advocate, I just calls em the way I sees em. It's interesting to note that only the people who disagrees [SIC] with my opinion challenges [SIC] my statement; there's no cure for stupid. It's obvious to some of us that [SIC] understands [SIC] what our form of decmoracy is all about including what our Constitution and Bill of Rights really stand for.

All you Bush supporters think you are right, but are blind to what used to make America great.