Re: Neo
GeorgeCrofton wrote:The N.T. is not the rewriting of the O.T., it is a continuation of it.
All the more reason to question the absurdity of the trinity doctrine.
GeorgeCrofton wrote:Jesus was a man of flesh, bones and blood. He did not attempt to glorify himself, he glorified God His Father. Jesus had great power but, he never used it for himself, he used it for others. Jesus experienced more agony than any man.
To whom did he pray? did he resurrect himself? Did he do his own will, or his father's?
GeorgeCrofton wrote:He had the power to turn his crucifiers into dust, then there would not have been a Crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
Very interesting. He had power; certainly. Is there a point here?
GeorgeCrofton wrote: He went through the pain and agony to cleanse mankind of the sin of Adam and Eve.
He died as a perfect man to provide a corresponding ransom for Adam. The torture was Satan's attempt to break his integrity to his father. (Another reason to doubt the trinity doctrine)
GeorgeCrofton wrote:Neo, . . . If a man was trying to kill one of your grand children, to what extremes would you take to save that child.
I don't own a gun; so I guess I'd have to break his arms.
The nation of Israel maintained an army under God's direction. When they were obedient, God protected them and gave them victory against any odds. How many men did it take Gideon to defeat the Midianites? How did Jehoshaphat defeat the Moabites and Ammonites? But, when they were disobedient, none of their military force was sufficient.
When Jesus introduced a new covenant and established a spiritual Israel, there was no longer any justification to maintain an army. Jesus said of his followers in John 17:16: "They are no part of the world, just as I am no part of the world." Early Christians refused military and government service. Should we be different?