I'm incredibly flattered but would be hard pressed to think something through that carefully these days. Loved it, though.
John McCain just received the below resume from someone hoping for an executive position in his future administration. He will be available after January 2009.
>
> GEORGE W. BUSH
> 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
> Washington, DC 20520
>
>
>
> EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE:
>
> Law Enforcement:
>
> I was arrested in Kennebunkport, Maine, in 1976 for
> driving under the influence of alcohol. I pled
> guilty, paid a fine, and had my driver's license
> suspended for 30 days. My Texas driving record has
> been "lost" and is not available.
>
>
> Military:
>
> I joined the Texas Air National Guard and went AWOL.
> I refused to take a drug test or answer any
> questions about my drug use. By joining the Texas
> Air National Guard, I was able to avoid combat duty
> in Vietnam.
>
>
> College:
>
> I graduated from Yale University with a low C
> average. I was a cheerleader.
>
>
>
>
> PAST WORK EXPERIENCE :
>
> I ran for U.S. Congress and lost.
>
> I began my career in the oil business in
> Midland,Texas in 1975. I bought an oil company, but
> couldn't find any oil in Texas. The company went
> bankrupt shortly after I sold all my stock.
>
> I bought the Texas Rangers baseball team in a
> sweetheart deal that took land using taxpayer money.
>
>
> With the help of my father and our friends in the
> oil industry (including Enron CEO Ken Lay), I was
> elected governor of Texas.
>
>
>
> ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS GOVERNOR OF TEXAS:
>
> I changed Texas pollution laws to favor power and
> oil companies, making Texas the most polluted state
> in the Union. During my tenure, Houston replaced Los
> Angeles as the most smog-ridden city in America.
>
> I cut taxes and bankrupted the Texas treasury to the
> tune of billions in borrowed money.
>
> I set the record for the most executions by any
> governor in American history.
>
> With the help of my brother, the governor of Florida
> , and my father's appointments to the Supreme Court,
> I became President of the United States, after
> losing by over 500,000 votes.
>
>
>
> ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS PRESIDENT:
>
> I am the first President in U.S. history to enter
> office with a criminal record.
>
> I invaded and occupied two countries at a continuing
> cost of over one billion dollars per week.
>
> I spent the U.S. surplus and effectively bankrupted
> the U.S. Treasury.
>
> I shattered the record for the largest annual
> deficit in U.S. history.
>
> I set an economic record for most private
> bankruptcies filed in any 12-month period.
>
> I set the all-time record for most foreclosures in a
> 12-month period.
>
> I set the all-time record for the biggest drop in
> the history of the U.S. stock market. In my first
> year in office, over 2 million Americans lost their
> jobs and that trend continues.
>
> I'm proud that the members of my cabinet are the
> richest of any administration in U.S. history. My
> "poorest millionaire," Condoleezza Rice, has a
> Chevron oil tanker named after her.
>
> I set the record for most campaign fund-raising
> trips by a U.S. President.
>
> I am the all- time U.S. and world record -holder for
> receiving the most corporate campaign donations.
>
> My largest lifetime campaign contributor, and one of
> my best friends, Kenneth Lay, presided over the
> largest corporate bankruptcy fraud in U.S. history,
> Enron.
>
> My political party used Enron private jets and
> corporate attorneys to assure my success with the
> U.S. Supreme Court during my election decision.
>
> I have protected my friends at Enron and Halliburton
> against investigation or prosecution. More time and
> money was spent investigating the Monica Lewinsky
> affair than has been spent investigating one of the
> biggest corporate rip-offs in history. I presided
> over the biggest energy crisis in U.S. history and
> refused to intervene when corruption involving the
> oil industry was revealed.
>
> I presided over the highest gasoline prices in U.S.
> history.
>
> I changed the U.S. policy to allow convicted
> criminals to be awarded government contracts.
>
> I appointed more convicted criminals to my
> administration than any President in U.S. history.
>
> I created the Ministry of Homeland Security, the
> largest bureaucracy in the history of the United
> States Government.
>
> I've broken more international treaties than any
> President in U.S. history.
>
> I am the first President in U.S. history to have the
> United Nations remove the U.S. from the Human Rights
> Commission.
>
> I withdrew the U.S. from the World Court of Law.
>
> I refused to allow inspector's access to U.S.
> "prisoners of war" detainees and thereby have
> refused to abide by the Geneva Convention.
>
> I am the first President in history to refuse United
> Nations election inspectors (during the 2002 US
> election).
>
> I set the record for fewest numbers of press
> conferences of any President since the advent of
> television.
>
> I set the all-time record for most days on vacation
> in any one- year period. After taking off the entire
> month of August, I presided over the worst security
> failure in U.S. history.
>
> I garnered the most sympathy ever for the U.S. after
> the World Trade Center attacks and less than a year
> later made the U.S. the most hated country in the
> world, the largest failure of diplomacy in world
> history.
>
> I have set the all-time record for most people
> worldwide to simultaneously protest me in public
> venues (15 million people), shattering the record
> for protests against any person in the history of
> mankind.
>
> I am the first President in U.S. history to order an
> unprovoked, pre-emptive attack and the military
> occupation of a sovereign nation. I did so against
> the will of the United Nations , the majority of
> U.S. Citizens and the world community.
>
> I have cut health care benefits for war veterans and
> support a cut in duty benefits for active duty
> troops and their families in wartime.
>
> In my State of the Union Address, I lied about our
> reasons for attacking Iraq and then blamed the lies
> on our British friends.
>
> I am the first President in history to have a
> majority of Europeans (71%) view my presidency as
> the biggest threat to world peace and security.
>
> I am supporting development of a nuclear "Tactical
> Bunker Buster," a WMD.
>
> I have so far failed to fulfill my pledge to bring
> Osama Bin Ladento justice.
>
>
>
> RECORDS AND REFERENCES:
>
> All records of my tenure as governor of Texas are
> now in my father's library, sealed and unavailable
> for public view.
>
> All records of SEC investigations into my insider
> trading and my bankrupt companies are sealed in
> secrecy and unavailable for public view.
>
> All records or minutes from meetings that I, or my
> Vice-President, attended regarding public energy
> policy are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for
> public review. I specified that my sealed documents
> will not be available for 50 years.
I wonder if the foul weather will hurt Hillary's chances in the rural areas - the urban parts have a lot shorter way to go to get to the polls.
Cycloptichorn
If her constituency is the 50+ crowd, arthritis may kick in with the colder, wet weather and keep them home. But, most of them probably already vote by mail so it may not have any effect.
sozobe wrote:It's about the breakdown of the black family -- how the buck is being passed and black fathers, especially, are not living up to their responsibilities. This isn't something that is said TO the black community often. Bill Cosby caused a pretty big commotion when he tried it.
Eh, really? Didnt Cosby go on some whole national tour or something bringing that message? Hasnt Oprah gone on about this xx number of times now?
Hell, even in hip-hop youve had any number of righteous brothers bringing this message over and over again. Spike Lee did it in
Get on the Bus. It's not exactly some ground-breaking brave thing to say, especially not for a black politician.
<shrug>
I have the impression it is. It definitely got a huge response -- why do you think it did?
...I do think it's rare for a) a politician to b) say it directly TO the audience in question. When Oprah says stuff, who is she saying it to?
I think the fact that the women responded especially strongly was telling -- that they liked the idea of a respected, powerful black man was saying that to an audience that included, presumably, some of the very black men who have been shirking their responsibilities.
I'm not sure though, I'm guessing. It definitely got a strong response, just musing on why.
Meanwhile, local color:
Went to Obama HQ today. Really hard not to be optimistic there. Lots of people, lots going on. No yard signs left -- huge demand. Sozlet chatted with several staffers for a while and generally had fun. I'm going to be bringing lunch food to them tomorrow.
So I'm pretty optimistic about Columbus, but I know it's kind of a bubble in terms of Ohio in general. As in, what I see here is not that representative.
sozobe wrote:<shrug>
I have the impression it is. It definitely got a huge response -- why do you think it did?
If anything, I think the fact that it was apparently such an easy crowdpleaser shows that it was
not a particularly brave or groundbreaking thing to say.
Matt Yglesias on the bias question:
Quote:The Clinton campaign is pushing hard on the idea that the press has been kinder to Barack Obama than it's been to her, and I know a lot of her supporters are totally up in arms about this. I'd say it's definitely true that, on balance, Obama has gotten better press than Clinton. Still, I think Clinton fans are going more than a little overboard with this monocausal account of the campaign. For one thing, one important exception to this is that if Obama had lost eleven contests in a row, there's no way he'd still be treated as a viable candidate. Similarly, if Obama had reached a situation where nobody can mathematically see a way for Clinton to catch his lead without altering DNC rules, I seriously doubt the race would continue to be covered as a serious competition.
From another direction, even though the press has often been unfair to Clinton about petty stuff, they have been very willing to go along with the idea that she has a vast experience edge over Obama even though it's always been unclear what exactly that edge consisted of. On top of that, the country's most prominent liberal columnist has been pretty consistently attacking Obama for months now. Now, yes, I do think there's been more BS thrown in her direction and there's obviously been an "Obama swoon" factor that there's no equal of on the other side (even Krugman, for example, writes only about his loathing of Obama and his supporters and never says anything good about Clinton) and that's been a factor in the race. Still, on the central argument of her campaign, Clinton's been treated reasonably well and the press has actually bent over backwards to keep her in the race under circumstances when almost anyone else would have been written off.
http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/the_race_and_the_media.php
sozobe wrote:Meanwhile, local color:
Went to Obama HQ today. Really hard not to be optimistic there. Lots of people, lots going on. No yard signs left -- huge demand. Sozlet chatted with several staffers for a while and generally had fun. I'm going to be bringing lunch food to them tomorrow.
So I'm pretty optimistic about Columbus, but I know it's kind of a bubble in terms of Ohio in general. As in, what I see here is not that representative.
Does this mean you got the job?
I didn't, no. I've been volunteering in various ways but didn't get the paid job I applied for.
So, election day dawns, and it's uhhhhhh-gly. Heavy cloud cover, a steady rain. At least it's not an absolute downpour. And at least the rain isn't freezing yet. There's a flood watch on, though.
OK, some good news. Just checked the weather and the temperature isn't supposed to get below freezing all day. Still, it IS supposed to rain all day.
sozobe wrote:Meanwhile, local color:
Went to Obama HQ today. Really hard not to be optimistic there. Lots of people, lots going on. No yard signs left -- huge demand. Sozlet chatted with several staffers for a while and generally had fun. I'm going to be bringing lunch food to them tomorrow.
So I'm pretty optimistic about Columbus, but I know it's kind of a bubble in terms of Ohio in general. As in, what I see here is not that representative.
That's interesting to hear. From where I am, it looks like Clinton has stalled Obama's momentum and has the press staring at their navels to see if they are biased. I guess the proof comes tonight.
Yep. I'm not expecting an Ohio win, certainly.
I think that a potent combination for Hillary has been having her back against the wall in one way or another and having the press declare her candidacy over. I kept wincing at the post-mortems, and there have been a lot of them. The first several had lot of disclaimers included, but they've gotten more brazen.
All of that seems to have been taken down several notches yesterday and today -- that could go either way, though. It could make for an atmosphere more conducive to those undecideds voting for Obama, or it could make them want to be part of the "comeback."
The part that annoys me most -- and I don't know if it is to Clinton's credit, or if it's Obama's problem, or if it happened independent of either of their attempts to shape the narrative -- is that Ohio and Texas were picked to be the Clinton firewall because they were so friendly towards her. She was long supposed to not only win but win big. If Obama steals Texas and/ or comes close in either one (OH, TX), that already represents a huge leap from where things were supposed to be.
But the leap was looking very promising late last week or so, so things started going even further than that -- wow, he might win BOTH of them!! How amazing would that be!
I think that got a bit out of hand, and that expectations are too high now. It should be amazing enough if he just stays close in OH and TX. Now a loss will be seen as a Problem.
sozobe wrote:OK, some good news. Just checked the weather and the temperature isn't supposed to get below freezing all day.
That's for Columbus -- evidently things are not good elsewhere.
Northern Ohio (including Cleveland):
Quote:... Winter Weather Advisory remains in effect until midnight EST
tonight...
A Winter Weather Advisory remains in effect until midnight for
Northern Ohio and northwest Pennsylvania.
A little rain and snow and freezing rain is expected this
morning. Freezing rain is expected to redevelop this afternoon and
continue into tonight... then change to snow. A glaze of ice is
expected. Snow accumulations later tonight should be about an
inch.
Monitor the latest forecast for updates. There is still some
doubt as to the amount of freezing rain that will occur. If the
freezing rain becomes heavy... an ice storm is possible.
Be careful... even a light coating of ice can make driving and
walking dangerous. It is sometimes difficult to recognize an icy
surface... it may look wet.
What is your feeling for whom that most hurts?
Way back, like, when Iowa voted, the common wisdom was that low turnout = good for Hillary, cause she depended on the hardcore party folk, who'd vote for any election, whereas his candidacy depended on lots of new voters with no experience and no habit of primary voting etc.
But now, I dont know anymore what the CW is? All of that is still true, but on the other hand it's the Obama supporters who seem more fired up, more passionate, and thus perhaps more likely to brave the weather, while the Hillary camp appears to include a lot more cynical seen-it-all folk, who might not want to bother if there's an unexpected obstacle... I have no idea anymore how that weighs up anymore, to be honest. What's your feeling about it?
I was just thinking about that too. Not sure.
Two different elements:
1.) Early voting. I know firsthand that Obama campaign workers were really, really pushing it. I don't have a basis for comparison with what the Hillary campaign was doing. But I just read this (First Read):
Quote:The absentee factor: Yesterday, NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli reported that there are signs Obama might have the early-voting edge in Ohio. Indeed, these contests could very well be the first ones in which early/absentee voting actually benefits Obama, because that voting will have started after Obama went on his post-Feb. 5 run. Factor in some bad weather -- lots of rain -- expected in Ohio, and does that cut into Clinton's lead there?
2.) Fired up, ready to go. I do tend to think that it's Obama supporters who would be more willing to just VOTE no matter what. The bubble comes into play there again, though. (I simply haven't met many Hillary supporters, and the ones I've met haven't been that passionate.)
From the article that was pointed to:
Quote:Some said that the Obama campaign in particular seems to have generated the most activity. In Montgomery County, Harsman said that the day after the Obama campaign did a massive phone push to get people to vote, more than 1,000 people came in person to vote, doubling or tripling the usual day-to-day traffic. "From our experience, it's Obama that's having the impact here," said Summit County's Williams, who added that some voters have been mistakenly putting "Obama" in the part of the form where they are supposed to indicate their party.
Clinton's campaign has been active as well in encouraging early votes. On the first day of balloting, Gov. Ted Strickland led events all over the state to draw attention to early voting as he cast his ballot in Franklin County. This weekend, it held events in all 88 counties in which early voting was a focal point.
But it appears that Obama's campaign has been more deliberate about encouraging these votes, even at events for campaign surrogates. At an event in Akron for Michelle Obama last week, a field organizer asked for a show of hands of how many people had already voted. More than a third of the crowd raised their hands. And the next day, at an event in Canton, the campaign had vans waiting outside the event waiting to bring people to vote at the Stark County Board of Elections.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/03/725905.aspx
I am well and truly stumped. I can see a lot of different scenarios, and I don't have any particular gut feelings. (Or I do, but then I immediately second-guess them because what I'm seeing around here doesn't really seem to be representative.)
OK, thanks. Good to have a voice from 'on the spot'.