cjhsa wrote:He must have been wearing his fake second eye.
That's the funniest thing I've ever heard from you, cyhsa.
Keep it up...... :wink:
dlowan wrote:msolga wrote:dlowan wrote:msolga wrote:Why should a photograph of anyone be posted to a
political thread?
It's a cesspool.
Well it's certainly a
novel approach!
The THREAD is a cesspool.
That's not all that novel. :wink:
So I checked out the thread, Deb.
Indeed it is a cesspool.
Why oh why can't they just stick to just debating the issues? :wink:
More like a sandbox where the toddlers go to play with each other and have turf wars.
I think it is really hilarious that anyone would try to make fun of the way I look and that someone would imply that my image had to be "photoshopped" to make me look good. In reality, I look a lot better than any of my pics.
I went out on my first date Saturday night after my self-imposed eight months of celibacy. And for the first time I wore my Dominatrix attire in public, it was Halloween after all. My date (already my new boyfriend) was thrilled with the way I looked as was a large contingent of the straight male population here... he just now called me again saying how amazing Saturday night was. (and Sunday morning and...)
I just feel really stupid letting those creeps get to me, I just thought that there was a fellowship at A2K and that members wouldn't be so low as to try to denigrate someone this way. Of course, in reality, I was looking back at all the photos of me that are up on this site and one thing that that I noticed is how I was smiling in each one so this feeble attempt to belittle me wound up blowing up in this guy's face and he only looks small and contemptible for what he tried to do.
As far as the other picture....Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Don't sweat it.
Roxxxanne-Personally, I don't think that it is a bad picture at all, (although the poster could have removed the "red eye" very easily).
I had not seen the original post with the picture, until you linked to it on this thread. If you thought that what the poster did was in such bad taste, why in the world would you start a thread about it, and link to the aforementioned picture? Is it possible, that in reality, you like the notoriety?
I think that the lady she doth protest too much!
Yeah...but the attack was truly reprehensible.
Yeccchhh.
Shrugs.
msolga- I won't go there. I have found that on A2K the vast majority of the political threads are either an exercise in mental masturbation, or the situation of "my fodder is better than your fodder". I got over that stuff when I graduated Junior High!
I make it my business to avoid them, unless they are really interesting and thought provoking, and that narrows the field down a bit.
dlowan wrote:Yeah...but the attack was truly reprehensible.
Yeccchhh.
Shrugs.
"
Attack"? I posted an
un-altered,
un-fuzzy,
un-photoshopped photo that was already previously posted on A2K. I didn't even comment on that photo ...
not one word. The "attacks" came after, and were directed at me. Get a grip, rabbit ... and perhaps
reread the thread in question.
Hi Roxxx
Thought I'd drop by and see who is out for their morning troll - and it's The Lone Ranger and Tonto.
Joke:
How do you know when Tonto has taken a bath
He leaves a ring around the cesspool
Sg
I just went to that other thread and read foward from page 300 or so...
yeesh.....I so wanted to clap my hands and say "Children! Everyone sit down right now and put your heads down on your desk for some quiet time!"
Actually though, it WAS miller who came along and said something that, as ususal, didn't make total sense.
I think that was the starting point.
Then of course, she disappeared.
