0
   

Blackwater

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Oct, 2007 09:36 pm
cjhsa wrote:
Eric Prince is on 60 Minutes tonight to discuss the allegations.


That oughta give you a major viagra moment.

Eewwwwww, look everybody, there's cjhsa all over the screen. Smile
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Oct, 2007 05:06 am
bm
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Oct, 2007 05:53 am
JTT wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
Eric Prince is on 60 Minutes tonight to discuss the allegations.


That oughta give you a major viagra moment.

Eewwwwww, look everybody, there's cjhsa all over the screen. Smile


This is what I get for simply providing useful info on a thread?
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Oct, 2007 09:18 pm
I can hear A2K47 firing away. Bam, bam, bam ....
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 05:51 am
Cute but it's an M-16.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2007 10:31 pm
What an arrogant dickhead!
Quote:


Blackwater won't allow arrests

By Sharon Behn
October 17, 2007

A defiant Blackwater Chairman Erik Prince said yesterday he will not allow Iraqi authorities to arrest his contractors and try them in Iraq's faulty justice system.

"We will not let our people be taken by the Iraqis," Mr. Prince told editors and reporters at The Washington Times. At least 17 of 20 Blackwater guards being investigated for their roles in a Sept. 16 shooting incident are still in a secure compound in Baghdad's Green Zone and carrying out limited duties.

http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071017/FOREIGN/110170057/1003




Ship them all, including Prince, to The Hague. They can be put in the same ship hold as all of the republican war criminals. Those that escape prison there can then be shipped to Iraq for trial.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2007 05:52 am
JTT: You first.

Why does A2K attract such deluded idiots?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2007 08:02 am
cjhsa wrote:
JTT: You first.

Why does A2K attract such deluded idiots?


There's just no explaining it, Cjhsa. There's you, McG, Ticomaya, Baldimo, ... in no particular order denoting depth of delusion. We just know that it's serious for each and every one.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2007 08:04 am
You just joined my special club. I call it the "enemy combatant club".
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2007 08:07 am
cjhsa wrote:
You just joined my special club. I call it the "enemy combatant club".


A clear indication of the depth of your delusion.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2007 08:37 am
Can't we...can't we...all just get abong?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2007 09:20 am
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2007 09:23 am
more information
More information

http://www.able2know.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=103827
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2007 09:25 am
Hey, Blatham, you may be on to something there--more bongs, less war, let's mellow out, dudes.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Nov, 2007 08:57 am
"Jan Schakowsky is one of the few members of Congress who have made confronting the radically privatized war machine a legislative priority. Even before Blackwater operatives gunned down seventeen Iraqis and wounded some twenty-four others in Baghdad in September, propelling the issue of private forces to front-page news, Schakowsky had mercenaries in her scope. Now she is introducing legislation that seeks to end the use of companies like Blackwater in US war zones by 2009. Her Stop Outsourcing Security (SOS) Act "would mandate that all diplomatic security in Iraq be undertaken by U.S. government personnel within 6 months of enactment." It would also allow Congress to view any current security contract greater than $5 million and require government agencies and the military to report the number of contractors employed in Iraq and Afghanistan, any disciplinary actions taken against them, the total cost of the contracts and the number of contractors wounded or killed. "Private contracting companies have forfeited their right to represent the United States," says Schakowsky, asserting that they "put our troops in harm's way, and resulted in the unnecessary deaths of many innocent Iraqi civilians. They have become a liability instead of an asset."

The SOS bill is by far the toughest legislation to target private forces in Iraq, but it is not without problems. There is a loophole that could unwittingly pave the way for an expansion of the US war machine in Iraq. Calling for the government to take over from Blackwater, Triple Canopy and DynCorp could amount to de facto support for the dramatic and unprecedented militarization of the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security. The department's Worldwide Personal Protective Services was originally envisioned as a small-scale bodyguard operation to protect small groups of US diplomats and other US and foreign officials. In Iraq, the Administration has turned it into a paramilitary force several thousand strong. Spending on the program jumped from $50 million in 2003 to $613 million in 2006. Schakowsky chose not to address this issue in her legislation, saying it "deserves a separate bill" and adding that she believes the issue should be investigated. In the absence of such action, her legislation could encourage more spending on what has become a paramilitary squad under the command of the White House."
http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20071126&s=scahill

2 American companies like scandal-plagued Blackwater aren't the only ones sending fighters to Iraq -- German companies are also part of the mix. Their mercenaries are either getting rich in the process or returning home in a coffin
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,516434,00.html
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Nov, 2007 08:18 am
FBI finds Blackwater Iraq shootings unjustified, report says

Quote:
The shootings of 14 of the 17 Iraqi civilians killed by Blackwater security personnel in a September confrontation were unjustified and violated rules on the use of deadly force, according to a newspaper report.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Nov, 2007 08:34 am
But were not such contractors given immunity for any of their actions?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Nov, 2007 08:51 am
They were given immunity from Iraq (which was/is shameful) but not from the US.

Quote:
Blackwater operated basically without oversight since proconsul Paul Bremer gave it a no-bid $27.7 million security contract in 2003, with immunity from Iraqi law. In 2004, four of its soldiers were ambushed in Fallujah and their bodies desecrated, bringing retaliation that killed hundreds of Iraqis, leveled the city and fueled the insurgency. A month ago, Blackwater guards killed 17 Iraqi civilians, in an incident that has drawn the attention of Congress and the FBI.



source

(the whole article is interesting)

Here is another one:

State Dept official's brother linked to Blackwater

John Kerry spoke the unvarnished truth when he said,

Quote:
SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: We're going to keep pounding, let me tell you. We're just beginning to fight here. These guys are -- these guys are the most crooked, you know, lying group of people I've ever seen. It's scary.


source

I hope all those who didn't vote for Kerry for any of the many inane reasons but didn't like Bush are happy with themselves.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Nov, 2007 09:22 am
If they committed murders in Iraq and Iraq can't prosecute then I guess that means they're home free. We can't prosecute them, or can we?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 08:31 pm
Or can we, indeed?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2007/11/blackwater_lawsuit_says_order.php

Quote:
Blackwater lawsuit says order ignored

Lawsuit Claims Blackwater Guards Abandoned Post on Day of Shootings, Used Steroids
even though an estimated one in four of them was using steroids or other "judgment altering substances."

A Blackwater spokeswoman said Tuesday its employees are banned from using steroids or other enhancement drugs but declined to comment on the other charges detailed in the 18-page lawsuit.

The lawsuit was filed Monday on behalf of five Iraqis who were killed and two who were injured during the Sept. 16 shooting in Baghdad's Nisoor Square. The Justice Department is investigating whether it can bring criminal charges in the case that has enraged the Iraqi government, even though the State Department promised limited immunity to the Blackwater guards.

The three teams of an estimated dozen Blackwater bodyguards had already dropped off the State Department official they were tasked with protecting when they headed to Nisoor Square, according to the lawsuit filed by lawyers working with the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Blackwater and State Department personnel staffing a tactical operations center "expressly directed the Blackwater shooters to stay with the official and refrain from leaving the secure area," the complaint says. "Reasonable discovery will establish that the Blackwater shooters ignored those directives."


Source: AP News


Doesn't look rosy for Blackwater USA at the moment.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Blackwater
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 05/20/2024 at 09:38:10