24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2015 11:34 pm
@coldjoint,
Where in the hell did you get that "stat?"?
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2015 03:34 am
@coldjoint,
Holy shut! You hit shyt dirt. Good imagination though.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2015 11:31 pm
@RABEL222,
http://www.politicalislam.com/tears-of-jihad/
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2015 12:40 am
@coldjoint,
More of your stupid bull ****. I "estimate" that you have an IQ of a 3 month old.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2015 08:28 am
@RABEL222,
Stats? Stats! carpfart don't need no stinkin' stats! He arrives at his stupidity entirely stat-free!
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2015 08:30 am
@coldjoint,
http://www.politicalislam.com/tears-of-jihad/

hahahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

RW not a Muslim among them shithole blog. The crap I allow carpfart to con me into looking at!!!
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2015 08:33 am
@RABEL222,
Why are you so hard on three months old infants?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2015 06:51 pm
http://www.politicalislam.com/statistical-islam-part-1-of-9/\
Quote:

One of the great questions of the 21st century is: What is the true nature of Islam? There are two distinct answers to this question from the media and leaders. The popular message is that Islam is one of the great world religions, a peaceful religion, a foundation of world civilization, its Golden Age was the highpoint of history, and it preserved Western thought while we were in the Dark Ages. The alternative message is that Islam is a brutal, backward, woman abusing, violent, intellectually narrow ideology that is out to annihilate civilization.

Which side is right? How do we resolve this issue? Can it even be resolved? If we turn to the “experts” of any of the opinions, they will tell you that their view is correct. What then is the ultimate authority that will give us a firm foundation for reasoning and judgment about Islam? Is it possible to use critical thought or must we just accept the authority of experts?

There is way to achieve consensus about ideas that goes beyond expert opinion. The use of facts along with logic is the basis of critical thought. The ultimate form of critical thought uses measurements and numbers to resolve questions. This paper will use the foundational texts of Islam and measure the importance of ideas by how many words are given to concepts. The assumption is that the more content that is devoted to a subject, the greater the importance of the subject is. As an example: the Koran devotes 64% of its text to the subject of the unbeliever. This is assumed to imply that the unbeliever is important in Islamic doctrine.

The use of critical thought may seem counter-intuitive since many people view Islam as a religion that does not have a rational basis. Actually, Islam is not only rational; it is hyper-rational, but it uses another form of logic than the one we take for granted.

If we are to use critical thought, we must have a firm foundation. All Muslims agree that:

“There is no god, but Allah and Mohammed is His messenger.”

When this is repeated as a public testimony, you become a Muslim. However, this statement is not only the beginning of Islam, it is also the foundation and totality of Islam. It is not enough to worship Allah; you must worship as Mohammed worshipped.

Who is Allah and where do we learn about Him? This question points directly to the Koran.

Then the Koran, in turn, points directly to Mohammed. It says 91 times that Mohammed is the perfect Muslim. He is the divine human prototype, the only pattern acceptable to Allah. The actions and words of Mohammed are so important that they have a special name—Sunna. We find the Sunna in two texts. The Sira is the biography of Mohammed and the Hadith is the collection of hadiths (small stories, traditions) about Mohammed.

Islam is based on Koran and Sunna. Since the Sunna is found in the Sira and the Hadith, this means that three books contain all the doctrine of Islam—the Trilogy. If it is in the Trilogy (Koran, Sira, Hadith), then it is Islam. If something is not in the Trilogy, then it is not Islam. All of the Islamic doctrine is found in the Trilogy. Now, we have the complete information with no missing pieces.

We have established our first criteria of knowledge. All authoritative statements about Islam must include a reference to the Trilogy to be authenticated. It does not matter what a scholar, imam, media guru, or anyone else says, if what they say cannot be supported by the doctrine in the Trilogy, then it is not Islam. If it is supported by the Trilogy, then it is Islam.

We have been taught that the Koran is the source of Islamic doctrine. However, the Koran is only 14% of the total sacred texts . Actually, the Sira and the Hadith are 86% of the total textual doctrine . Islam is 14% Allah and 86% Mohammed. This is very good news. The Koran is obscure, but anyone can understand the life and sayings of Mohammed. These statistics point to the easy way to know Islam—know Mohammed. Anyone, absolutely anyone, can understand Mohammed and hence, Islam.

Relative size of trilogy texts

Islam is a text-based doctrine, so the nature of these texts must be made clear. A Muslim believes that the Koran is perfect, complete, universal and eternal. It does not contain the slightest error and it is the exact words of the only god of the universe. Mohammed is the perfect example of how to live the sacred life. This idea of complete, final, universal, and perfect textual truth is very hard for non-Muslims to comprehend. Most people read the Koran with the attitude of: “Oh, they don’t really believe this.” When Muslims read the Koran, their attitude is: “These are the perfect words of Allah.” Muslims call themselves the “believers” and by that they mean that they believe the Koran is perfect and Mohammed is the perfect pattern of life.

Remember, we started with the question: Can we evaluate what the media commentators, politicians, imams and other “experts” say about the true nature of Islam? Yes, we can know the true nature of Islam—it is found in the Trilogy. If what the expert has to say can be supported by the doctrine found in the Trilogy, then it is valid, since the Trilogy is the final arbiter of all opinions and statements about Islam.

Critical thought provides a powerful first step. Now, let us measure the doctrine of Islam. The following cases show how the technique of counting the number of words that are devoted to a topic can be used to discover the dominant themes of Islamic texts and, hence, Islamic doctrine.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 05:50 am
there's no end to their hatred: House Votes To Repeal Affordable Care Act For 56th Time. [View all]


The House voted 239-186 today to repeal the Affordable Care Act, the latest effort by the Republican-controlled chamber to scrap the law.

The measure also would direct panels to come up with a replacement for the healthcare law — though it doesn't provide a timeline on any new legislation or what provisions it may contain.

The House-approved measure likely will be defeated in the Senate, where the GOP has a smaller majority. President Obama has threatened to veto any legislation that rips up his signature achievement.

The Associated Press notes the House has voted more than 50 times in the past two years to repeal the law. What was different about today's vote? NPR's S.V. Date writes in our It's All Politics blog: "What makes today a milestone is that, for the first time, House Republicans plan to vote on whether to actually take health coverage away from millions of Americans who now have it."


http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2015/02/03/383621170/house-votes-to-repeal-affordable-care-act
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 09:58 am
@bobsal u1553115,
There is also the fact that it will have a vote in the Senate where Harry Reid is no longer in a position to only pass Dem legislation and protect Obama. There were over 300 bills passed in the House that Harry Reid stalled in the Senate, now they will get a chance and I'm sure that just eats at you.
revelette2
 
  2  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 10:47 am
@Baldimo,
So do you believe the Senate under McConnell is going to bring up a repeal Obamacare vote only for it to be vetoed by Obama? I really do not think there will be enough democrats to override a veto. But knowing democrats, I could be wrong, not the most courageous bunch around.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 02:11 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
there's no end to their hatred:


There is no end to your blather.http://www.doomjunkie.com/images/smilies/stfy.gif
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 02:44 pm
@Baldimo,
You keep repeating this and it is still hogwash.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 02:50 pm
@revelette2,
They won't get enough votes to bring such a bill to the floor. Democrats will filibuster any such bill.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 02:56 pm
@parados,
How is it hogwash? Do you deny that the House over the last 2 years has passed several hundred almost 300 of them? It was well known that Reid didn't allow any House bills to be voted on.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/08/08/yes-the-senate-is-ignoring-hundreds-of-bills-passed-by-the-gop-house-but-its-always-that-way/

What now? It was a do nothing Senate that was lead by Harry Reid.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 05:24 pm
@Baldimo,
The hogwash is you don't understand the process for passing bills. The Senate has never simply voted on House bills. To argue that Reid blocked those bills is hogwash. Most of those bills were assigned to the committee and then never made it out or a similar bill was introduced by a Senator that was passed, died or never made it out of committee.


http://thomas.loc.gov/home/LegislativeData.php
I challenge you to find 300 bills passed by the House that made it out of committee before Reid blocked a floor vote. I will bet you $1,000,000 you can find no such number blocked from a vote by Reid. The majority of House bills were referred to a committee. Reid doesn't set the agenda of a committee nor does he keep bills that were referred to a committee on his desk to block them.

Read your source. Harry Reid did not block the bills. The Senate is using the same process the Senate as always used. 300 House bills that never have a vote in the Senate is about the standard for every Congress. Your argument is Hogwash. Your own source proves your argument is hogwash.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 05:48 pm
@parados,
Hiding behind procure, locking them up in committees? Reid never once asked that those committees to move forward? Yet you and your fellows on the left wanted to say the GOP was holding things up when it looks like it was the Senate and the grid lock Reid created to protect Obama. 300 bills is a lot of bills for a Congress that didn't do anything and as you have said before was the least productive Congress in history. Is it any wonder why nothing got done? Reid ran the Senate and nothing was done, the blame goes to Reid and his obstructionism. Now we will see what the Senate can get done.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 06:24 pm
@parados,
When all baldino's got is hogwash, he'll ride the hogwash to the bitter end.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 06:28 pm
@coldjoint,
******* pogue.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2015 06:37 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
Hiding behind procure, locking them up in committees?
The exact same process that has been used for the last 100 years or more. Coming up with some grand conspiracy makes you look like a nut.

Quote:
300 bills is a lot of bills for a Congress that didn't do anything and as you have said before was the least productive Congress in history
300 bills is about average and isn't even close to the highest total which was when the same party controlled both the House and the Senate. Read your source material.

Quote:
Now we will see what the Senate can get done.
I would bet that the Senate will probably not pass over 300 bills that the House passes in this Congress. But then I suppose you will blame Reid for that too.


Quote:
Reid ran the Senate and nothing was done, the blame goes to Reid and his obstructionism.
Actually the Senate passed a number of bills that were never voted on in the House. But I suppose that is Reid's fault too in your mind.

Let's put this in perspective. In the last 20 congresses, 13 of them had 300 or more House bills that were not acted on in the Senate. 19 of the 20 had 250 or more House bills not acted on by the Senate. That is from your source. The actions of the Senate were about the same as normal when it comes to House bills.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/08/08/yes-the-senate-is-ignoring-hundreds-of-bills-passed-by-the-gop-house-but-its-always-that-way/

That leads us to 2 things.
1) The Senate majority leader doesn't control the actions of the committees. He can certainly set party agenda, but you give him powers that no majority leader has. McConnell won't be able to force bills out of committee any more than Reid can. Blaming Reid for the actions of the Senate shows a complete failure to understand how the Senate works. I look forward to your blaming McConnell in the next 2 years. (I doubt you will do that however.)
2) This Senate has been no different than most of the previous 20 Senates when it comes to passing House bills. I wonder if you will blame McConnell when this Senate acts in the same fashion and fails to act on 300 House bills. We are barely a month into it and we are already seeing the first bills that aren't making it to the Senate floor.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 02:46:49