Oz School Girls Hospitalized After HPV Vaccine

marty...this thread was started by michael1...I think that answers your question.

Oh, I'm not too familiar with Michael1 yet. All I know is that I can't lock my daughter up until she's 30. I've done a great job, if I do say so myself, on talking to her about life changes and the pressures put on young people by their peers. I believe that she is at an age where she is going to start making big decisions for herself, whether they are good decisions or bad. I don't think she, or anyone else for that matter, should be penalized for making mistakes in their lives, including having premarital sex. If she some day makes that decision then I would rather she be protected from life threatening diseases.

Who said anything about abstinence? Honestly, I do hope my daughter
will have premarital sex. How else can she find out if her future partner
is compatible? The question is: how safe is the vaccination and for how
long has it been researched? I am just not convinced that it won't have
adverse long term health risks because research is fairly new.

I certainly will teach my daughter to protect herself from STD's and
take precautions with her health. The better educated she is about
sexual matters, the better choices she'll make.

I don't know, this line just bothered me.

Ohhhhh, now I get it. All of Michael1's resources are from Christian forums and web-sites.

Here are some other web-sites to check out if you want more info.
http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/results/cervical-cancer-vaccine1102

http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/STDFact-HPV-vaccine.htm

http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_6x_FAQ_HPV_Vaccines.asp

This thread just hit a nerve with me. I work in a field where we see lots of cancer patients and some of them are women suffering through cervical cancer.

HPV vaccines may not be everyones choice. There are other ways to prevent the virus such as using condoms and limiting the number of sexual partners. I found nothing in reputable websites discussing serious side effects or death.

Well, I am not into all that Christian crapola, I am looking at various articles of research, and here is an excerpt of a reputable government site actually promoting the vaccine, however...


Source

There are just too many question marks in my book, and the vaccine
was tested on women for 5 years only. Mind you, women and not girls.
How will it affect girls? Every study talks about women used as study
subjects.

I am really pro vaccination, was the first one in line for chickenpox,
but here, I am overly cautious.

Re: Cervical Cancer Vaccine HOAX

There is no infectious material in this vaccine.
Does this vaccine contain thimerosal or mercury?
No. There is no thimerosal or mercury in the HPV vaccine. It is made up of proteins from the outer coat of the virus



Each year about 15,000 women in the United States learn that they have cervical cancer; an estimated 4,100 women will die of the disease this year.




blind faith I guess, not dissimmilar to believing in some mythical god like being

Papilloma viruses are very common in domestic animals, especially cattle and horses. I used to make my own autogenous vaccines routinely by soaking warts in saline, running the solution through filter paper, and adding a bit of formalin to inactivate the virus. I did this for literally hundreds of patients, without a single reaction. I find it hard to believe that large numbers of reactions in humans are anything but psychosomatic. Further, regardless of what Michael says, young people are pretty certain to have sexual relations. This ain't nothin' new, either.

Re: Cervical Cancer Vaccine HOAX
MERCK'S GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS
National Vaccine Information Center Criticizes
FDA for Fast Tracking Licensure

http://www.nvic.org/PressReleases/pr62706gardasil.htm

Washington, D.C. - The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is calling on the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to just say "no" on June 29 to recommending "universal use" of Merck's Gardasil vaccine in all pre-adolescent girls. NVIC maintains that Merck's clinical trials did not prove the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine designed to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts is safe to give to young girls.

"Merck and the FDA have not been completely honest with the people about the pre-licensure clinical trials," said NVIC president Barbara Loe Fisher. "Merck's pre and post-licensure marketing strategy has positioned mass use of this vaccine by pre-teens as a morality play in order to avoid talking about the flawed science they used to get it licensed. This is not just about teenagers having sex, it is also about whether Gardasil has been proven safe and effective for little girls."

The FDA allowed Merck to use a potentially reactive aluminum containing placebo as a control for most trial participants, rather than a non-reactive saline solution placebo.[1] A reactive placebo can artificially increase the appearance of safety of an experimental drug or vaccine in a clinical trial. Gardasil contains 225 mcg of aluminum and, although aluminum adjuvants have been used in vaccines for decades, they were never tested for safety in clinical trials. Merck and the FDA did not disclose how much aluminum was in the placebo.[2]

Animal and human studies have shown that aluminum can cause nerve cell death [3] and that vaccine aluminum adjuvants can allow aluminum to enter the brain, [4 5] as well as cause inflammation at the injection site leading to chronic joint and muscle pain and fatigue. [6 7] Nearly 90 percent of Gardasil recipients and 85 percent of aluminum placebo recipients followed-up for safety reported one or more adverse events within 15 days of vaccination, particularly at the injection site.[8] Pain and swelling at injection site occurred in approximately 83 percent of Gardasil and 73 percent of aluminum placebo recipients. About 60 percent of those who got Gardasil or the aluminum placebo had systemic adverse events including headache, fever, nausea, dizziness, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia. [9 10] Gardasil recipients had more serious adverse events such as headache, gastroenteritis, appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, asthma, bronchospasm and arthritis.

"Merck and the FDA do not reveal in public documents exactly how many 9 to 15 year old girls were in the clinical trials, how many of them received hepatitis B vaccine and Gardasil simultaneously, and how many of them had serious adverse events after being injected with Gardasil or the aluminum placebo. For example, if there were less than 1,000 little girls actually injected with three doses of Gardasil, it is important to know how many had serious adverse events and how long they were followed for chronic health problems, such as juvenile arthritis."

According to the Merck product manufacturer insert, there was 1 case of juvenile arthritis, 2 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, 5 cases of arthritis, and 1 case of reactive arthritis out of 11,813 Gardasil recipients plus 1 case of lupus and 2 cases of arthritis out of 9,701 participants primarily receiving an aluminum containing placebo. Clinical trial investigators dismissed most of the 102 Gardasil and placebo associated serious adverse events, including 17 deaths, that occurred in the clinical trials as unrelated.

"There is too little long term safety and efficacy data, especially in young girls, and too little labeling information on contraindications for the CDC to recommend Gardasil for universal use, which is a signal for states to mandate it," said Fisher. "Nobody at Merck, the CDC or FDA know if the injection of Gardasil into all pre-teen girls - especially simultaneously with hepatitis B vaccine - will make some of them more likely to develop arthritis or other inflammatory autoimmune and brain disorders as teenagers and adults. With cervical cancer causing about one percent of all cancer deaths in American women due to routine pap screening, it was inappropriate for the FDA to fast track Gardasil. It is way too early to direct all young girls to get three doses of a vaccine that has not been proven safe or effective in their age group."

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), founded in 1982 by parents of vaccine injured children, has been a leading critic of one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies and the lack of basic science research into biological mechanisms and high risk factors for vaccine-induced brain and immune system dysfunction. As a member of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), Barbara Loe Fisher urged trials include adequate safety data on pre-adolescent children and warned against fast tracking Gardasil at the November 28-29, 2001 VRBPAC meeting .[11]

Full 2001 FDA Transcript: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/cber01.htm#Vaccines & Related Biological

For more information go to www.NVIC.org.

-end-

1. Merck & Co., Inc. 2006. Gardasil [Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Types 6,11,16,18) Recombinant Vaccine] product insert. Table 6.

2. Food and Drug Administration. May 18, 2006. FDA Background Document for Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee: Gardasil HPV Quadrivalent Vaccine.

3. Kawahara M et al. 2001. Effects of aluminum on the neurotoxicty of primary cultured neurons and on the aggregation of betamyloid protein. Brain Res. Bull. 55, 211-217.

4. Redhead K. et al. 1992. Aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines transiently increase aluminum levels in murine brain tissue. Pharmacol. Toxico. 70, 278-280.

5. Sahin G. et al. 1994. Determination of aluminum levels in the kidney, liver and brain of mice treated with aluminum hydroxide. Biol. Trace. Elem. Res. 1194 Apr-May;41 (1-2):129-35.

6. Gherardi M et al. 2001. Macrophagaic myofastitis lesions assess long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide in muscle. Brain, Vol 124, No. 9, 1821-1831.

7. Shingde M eta la. 2005. Macrophagic myofastitis associated with vaccine derived aluminum. MJA, 183 (03):145-146.

8. Merck & Co. May 18, 2006. Merck briefing document for Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee: Gardasil. Table 24.

9. Merck & Co., Inc. 2006. Gardasil product insert: Serious Adverse Experiences.

10. Food and Drug Administration. May 18, 2006. FDA Background Document for Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.: Gardasil. Table 32.

11. Food and Drug Administration. November 29, 2001. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. Excerpt from transcript.

Re: Cervical Cancer Vaccine HOAX

Ya maybe at this time mercury isn't being used, but merck has lied about removing it from their vaccines before. Most vaccines still do use mercury which I will comment on in a minute.

And now instead of mercury we have corrosive toxins such as aluminium phosphate in them! (prevenar) This is why we refer to them as poisons ... because they ARE poisons and are classified AS poisons. The most truly amazing thing about this whole situation ... is that ANY child manages to come through unscathed and healthy. Its nothing short of a miracle, and a testament to the amazing strength and healing powers of the body.


Mercury is in many of the most used vaccines. In most of them in trace amounts but also fully in the flu shots reccommended for pregnant women and yearly for infants from 6 months old, and the tetanus booster. Thimerosal is a hazardous substance and a nuerotoxin requiring full protective gear to handle it, yet for some reason it is safe to inject into babies?

Take closer look at research regarding Gardasil HPV vaccine
http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2007/05/10/opinion/letters/126022.txt

Trish Cleary's letter (``Base vaccine views on scientific evidence,'' April 24) is typical of the ignorance of vaccine safety issues among public health officials. Her misinterpretation of Gardasil science might be related to her limited medical science training as a non-physician.

The mission statement in the McLean County Public Health Annual report confesses they have no role in vaccine safety, only promotion. This is important in understanding her viewpoint.

As a radiologist who devotes extensive time to vaccine safety and research, I am not anti-vaccine as she claims, but pro judicious vaccination.

Organizations like mine are critical in helping to assure the strong hand of industry does not improperly influence public health policy.

According to published research, complication rates among Gardasil recipients were as high as 92 percent, similar to the control group receiving a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant rather than saline. Fetal death was as high as 38 percent following vaccination, according to Merck.

The FDA has listed over 900 adverse Gardasil reactions including menstrual problems, seizures and syncope. Regarding efficacy, there are two Gardasil researchers who have spoken out against the premature conclusions of a ``cancer cure.''

It is not surprising that peer-reviewed literature has not raised greater concern about safety and effectiveness when over 40 percent of co-authors were Merck employees, including patent holders. According to Lancet (2005), Merck's Vioxx killed as many as 61,600 Americans, despite dozens of poorly designed, peer-reviewed papers touting its safety and enthusiastic approval by a conflicted FDA that routinely ignores long-term outcomes. My opinions are based upon peer-reviewed science and government documents.

Public health officials often readily accept the steady stream of disinformation and marketing propaganda from an FDA and CDC whose advisory board members, according to several congressional hearings, are frequently tied to pharmaceutical giants like Merck that have funded and created science aimed at delivering profits over safety.

Dr. David Ayoub

Springfield

The truth is universal, HAHA, I don't think I listed any Christian sites. You don't have to be an inquisitor executing me for heresy now, I'm open to learn the truth either way it is. I have provided a few more articles from reputable sites and nationally and internationally recognized authorities on the subjects.

Are you kidding me? You're actually laughing at me? I opened up your thread because I was genuinly interested in reading about this vaccine. And thank you, I've been motivated to research it further. But after reading what you had to say I began to wonder if this should have been entered under religion and spirituality. Somehow I feel like I was tricked into listening to your religious beliefs.

Well, it's actually not a belief but a sectarian missionary trail he's following here.

OK, thanks Walter, I'm done here.

Good job Walter. I didn't realize the "National Vaccine Information Center" or all these other medical doctors reports of the most severe reactions including many cases of DEATH, as quoted were "sectarian". That is the most important thing to realize, they're all just brainwashed sectarian propagandists. After 8 years being "indoctrinated" by big-pharma I'd only expect that. Thanks for the warning!

I could post some 'Letters to the Editors' from my local paper as well ...

Although I'm not primarily quoting those, I would think they're more reliable than the censored big business interest which carry major biases in big media. It is a miracle such nationally regarded authorities on the subjects published such reports about the problems with this vaccine. Then it is a double miracle that it is half way getting released out into the public.

Gardasil (HPV - Help Pay for Vioxx) vaccine
Gardasil (HPV - Help Pay for Vioxx) vaccine

Take note: NVIC (Nat'l Vaccine Info Center (NVIC.org) just published another finding regarding the side effects and deaths that have occurred among girls who have received this toxic vaccine.

What is not discussed in corporate media, which conveniently is owned in part by drug companies, is the 675 micrograms of reactive aluminum in the 3-shot series.

17 girls have died in clinical trials and 85% of 1200 recipients have had severe side effects ranging from myalgia, asthma, facial paralysis, seizures, loss of consciousness and Guillain-Barre syndrome. These
trials were rushed thanks to Merck who is trying to be the first on the market w/an HPV vaccine. Glaxco-Smith-Kline is close on their heels w/their own version.

Appoximately $5 million has been given by Merck to market this vaccine through advocacy groups promoted by Merck in state gov'ts. In CO, sponsors in "Women in Gov't" worked alongside Merck to attempt a mandate requiring their vaccine in schools. It backfired as Merck was advised to back off due to collusion w/state officials in states such as TX whereby Gov. Rick Perry had staff w/Merck ties. Transparency anyone? Parental groups have rallied to defeat this mandate and the bill was killed.

However, it was to surface in other bills, one in particular which took $1.5 million from preventative programs such as cervical screenings and pap smears which have reduced the rate of HPV by 75-80%. 90% of HPV clears by itself naturally. These monies were then allocated to the state "health" dept. which is doing the bidding of Merck.

The revolving door between Pharma and state and national officials such as those on advisory boards for the NIH, CDC, FDA, American Academy of Pediatricians, etc. is alarming. Forget about objectivity or consumers being represented on these boards. Doctors w/drug patents are the norm on these boards and blanket denials of any wrong-doing regarding drug and vaccine injuries/deaths are par for the course. The HPV vaccine is particularly worrisome insofar as safety and efficacy.

What safeguards are in place to reimburse patients/families for damages incurred by this neuro-toxic vaccine? None, I'm afraid as they are off the hook as insurance companies. are now mandated to cover the cost of the shot (avg. $360 for the 3-shot regimen).

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC.org) has an adverse events reporting system to record and monitor vaccine injuries. They have been receiving inquiries and reports since this vaccine came on the market a year ago of injuries and deaths have and are being reported.

Google search "Dr. Hugh Fudenberg" for more info on vaccine dangers, in particular flu shots which also contain high levels of aluminum, a known neuro-toxin. www.thinktwice.com is also very informative.

Check out your state's allowable exemptions which include philosophical, religious and medical exemptions. Vaccines are NOT mandatory for school admittance. Filling out an immunization schedule which has exemptions on the back side is.

It's your choice NOT to vaccinate. Having spoken with 7 doctors since starting research 25 years ago and meeting families whose children have been permanently damaged or have died led me to the decision not to vaccinate my own children. They are now teenagers and are among the healthiest of children. Years ago I met an admitting nurse at Denver Health who said after working 17 years in this position, she found that the healthiest of children were those that were NOT vaccinated.

Putting neuro-toxic ingredients such as formaldehyde, aluminum, thimerosol (49.6% ethyl mercury), diethylene glycol (anti-freeze), neomycin, streptomycin, squalene, etc. led me to conclude that vaccines do not confer immunity, but compromise it. Autism, which is now 1 in 150 children and was 1 in 10,000 in 1982, is the #1 developmental disability in CA. ADHD, asthma, diabetes are results of compromised immune systems due to an increasing toxic load on one's immune system. By the time a child is in 1st grade, they've received 60 doses of 17 vaccines.

Naturally occurring measles, mumps and chickenpox are necessary immune stimulants and prevent more serious dis-eases down the road such as MS, ALS, lupus, CFS, etc. Polio and other viruses were already on their way out by 90-95% prior to the vaccines coming onto the market due to better sanitation methods and chlorination of water supplies. Polio is a water-borne organism which thrives in dirty water such as that found in India and other 3rd world countries. However, the drug companies.

Having spent millions and many years, were not about to throw out the baby w/the bathwater, so to speak, and instead took credit for polio's demise.

Money and fear are what drives this machine and drug companies do not make $$ off of healthy people. As my sister-in-law and friend who are pharmaceutical reps stated, "the drug companies.' motto is 'womb to tomb, a customer for life' ". Just say "no" to drugs.

From Sophie at CancerCompass.com

The vaccine, when effective in females, will eliminate approximately 33% of potential cervical cancers.

Thus, even though a young female may be vaccinated against the causative virus, she still has the potential to develop cervical tumors.