Foxfyre wrote:DrewDad wrote:Foxfyre wrote: I'll offer you the same suggestion that I made Freeduck. Just analyze the posts in this thread and see who actually argued whether the statement as you posted it is right or wrong versus those who were criticizing/insulting me for making the statement. Then assign an ideology to each one as best as you can.
If this is your idea of unbiased, empirical research then I will have difficulty taking you seriously in the future.
Here's some advice, Fox: when you find yourself in a hole,
stop digging.
As further illustration of my observations and point here, I think probably only a liberal would extrapolate my friendly suggestion to Kicky into "(my) idea of unbiased, empirical research". I think a conservative would be less likely to do that. What do you think?
A) Please note the "if."
B) The notion of using this particular thread as any sort of gauge on general behavior is laughable. I can hardly count the number of flaws if one were to try to use this as a statistical sample.
C) You offer the "friendly suggestion" as if it has some sort of objective merit, which makes me question your honesty and intelligence.
Whether you are arguing from conviction or are simply having fun tweaking people's noses, you are doing a fine job of undermining your own credibility.