1
   

Al Sharpton, Mitt Romney & Bigotry

 
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 06:03 pm
Which are you?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 May, 2007 04:08 pm
snood wrote:
Which are you?


I win without guilt and I lose without resentment. I'm immune to the Rev's charms.

How about you?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 05:03 am
I still cant figure out, why Sharpton is called "Rev"!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 05:42 am
Short for reverend?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 05:42 am
How very sad.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 07:27 am
What amazes me is that he is on national TV every night. I find him sickening and a total sleaze, but not nearly as bad as is Bush.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 07:39 am
He is worse than Bush. But thankfully he is not in the position to do the damage that Bush can.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 07:54 am
Sharpton would not have defrauded the country into invading Iraq, given massive deficit tax breaks to the super rich, damaged governmental programs through terrible appointments, instituted torture, illegal wiretaps, etc.

Sharpton's damage would not have approached that accomplished by Bush.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 08:36 am
Advocate
Just a small snapshot of what that race baiting,selfserving racist Al Charlatan is capable of.


http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2003/11/09/the_race_baiter_in_the_campaign/?page=2
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 08:50 am
au1929 wrote:
He is worse than Bush. But thankfully he is not in the position to do the damage that Bush can.


If he keeps working his mouth, he'll cost Obama the election, assuming obama has any chance at the Presidency.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 09:10 am
Miller
Sharpton is not supporting Obama's can candidacy.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 04:06 pm
AU, that is old news, and a pin prick compared to all the damage caused by Bush.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 07:30 am
Advocate wrote:
AU, that is old news, and a pin prick compared to all the damage caused by Bush.


Read what I wrote
Quote:
He is worse than Bush. But thankfully he is not in the position to do the damage that Bush can.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 02:13 pm
My comment related to a Sharpton presidency. He would be a thousand times better (as bad as he is) as president compared to Bush's actual performance.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 03:55 pm
Advocate

With Sharpton as president we would not have to go out of country to fight a war. The war would be on the streets of America.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 04:48 pm
A Sharpton presidency would be 1000 times better than the Bush presidency. Wow.

I suppose someone you like would be a million times better, or maybe a billion times better, or even a gazillion times better.

I get it. You don't like Bush and you think as a president he is really really bad, but can you please try and be more specific and founded in your criticism? If this isn't possible, can you at least be a bit more literate? These sort of comments are akin to the bellowing of an angry bull (or maybe the buzzing of an annoying fly).

If you can't enlighten us, at least entertain us.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/22/2019 at 05:37:53