1
   

9/11 - The Presidential Cover-up Continues!

 
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 07:51 am
The contents of the following link from today's New York Times may also be of interest since the implication is that the Bush Administration may have engineered the illness and ultimate death of many more residents of New York than died in 9/11, by deliberately covering-up the polution dangers of the aftermath:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/26/opinion/26KRUG.html?th

Why worry about terrorism or terrorists, when self-appointed monsters in the White House are doing their work for them - and getting paid for it too?

With so many and ever-increasing numbers of innocent deaths to his credit, it could be that future historians will record the Bush name along with those of Adolph Hitler and Attilla The Hun.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 12:42 pm
My clothes dryer is on the fritz. Its only three years old!
THAT DAMNED BUSH!!!
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 12:45 pm
If you live in the Northeast, recently you could say your dryer isn't working because...no power...and truly shout "THAT DAMNED BUSH!!!"
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 12:50 pm
That's right! He is to blame for the power grid, as well!
And, the heat wave in France!
Wellstone and Carnahan!
Global warming!
Halitosis!
Ill-fitting eyewear!
The shuttle disaster!
The Middle East!

You will have to say this for him--he stays busy.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 01:03 pm
Quote:
Estimate for '04 Deficit Is Increased to $480 Billion
By DAVID STOUT


WASHINGTON, Aug. 26 ?- The federal government will run at a record $480 billion deficit in the next fiscal year, $5 billion more than the Bush administration had predicted, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said today. But the office saw the possibility of enormous deficits in the years ahead.

On paper, at least, federal deficits could begin to decline after next year, the office said. But it said that under the most optimistic projections, they could total nearly $1.4 trillion over the next 10 years.

But the $1.4 trillion does not take into account the cost of reconstruction in Iraq. And based on some changes that are highly probable ?- enactment of a prescription drug program under Medicare, for example ?- budget deficits could total $5 trillion over the next 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office said.

Only last month, the administration had foreseen a $475 billion deficit for the 2004 fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1. Since budget-watchers from both political parties were anticipating that the budget office might estimate next year's deficit at $500 billion or more, today's announcement that it sees a $480 billion deficit for 2004 could be heartening to President Bush and his allies, up to a point.

But Democrats have been criticizing Mr. Bush and his Republican allies on Capitol Hill for months for pushing through a series of tax cuts. Democrats contend that most of those cuts are fiscally irresponsible, amounting to favors for those already well off, and are likely to burden future generations with debt.

Typical of the Democrats' stance is the position taken by Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota, senior minority member on the Senate Budget Committee.

"Sadly, the massive 10-year tax cut of 2001, benefiting primarily the wealthiest, left the nation ill-prepared to deal with the economic downturn and war on terrorism that would follow," Mr. Conrad said in a statement. "We now again face deficits as far as the eye can see."

Mr. Bush and Republicans are sure to point to a section in the Congressional Budget Office report that states: "The economy now seems poised for a more sustained recovery. C.B.O. anticipates that gross domestic product will rise by nearly 4 percent in calendar year 2004 after growing by less than 2 percent in the first half of this year."

Mr. Bush and other Republicans have insisted that letting Americans keep ?- and spend ?- more of their hard-earned money by cutting taxes is the right way to reinvigorate the economy.

The budget office's projections for the next 10 years were marked with caveats and qualifiers that said, in essence, that no one can be sure what the big picture will look like in the years ahead. But the budget office's report does lay out certain alternative scenarios that, while not certain, are entirely realistic, even probable.

As for the projected $1.4 trillion deficit for the next 10 years, "the baseline does not include possible policy changes such as the introduction of a prescription drug program for Medicare beneficiaries," the Congressional Budget Office report noted.

But both houses of Congress have already voted for prescription drug plans under Medicare, anticipating expenditures of $400 billion over the first 10 years, and President Bush is eager to sign a plan into law, once the House and the Senate settle their differences on the details.

And since members of the baby boom generation are nearing retirement, as the Congressional Budget Office noted, they will account for far more federal spending in the years ahead, not just through Medicare but Social Security and other benefit programs.

Another factor is the "sunset" provision built into some tax cuts recently enacted by the Republican-controlled Congress. To placate some lawmakers (Republicans as well as Democrats) worried about huge deficits in the years ahead, some tax cuts are supposed to expire a decade or so from now.

But many politicians have said it is unrealistic, even cynical, to say that lawmakers will have the political courage years from now to take back tax cuts to which Americans will have grown accustomed.

Perhaps the biggest caveat of all, and it is a theme that can be gleaned from the otherwise dry words in the report, is that no one can truly predict what will happen to the economy.

As recently as early 2000, some economic experts foresaw surpluses for many years ahead. Then the stock market collapsed, the country was attacked by terrorists on Sept. 11, 2001, and costly wars unfolded in Afghanistan and Iraq.


Just in, from the NYTimes.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 01:03 pm
Sofie
Amazing how much that man can accomplish between his morning jogs and afternoon naps, to say nothing of his vacations in Texas---and fund raising treks.

BumbleBeeBoogie
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 01:07 pm
Tartarin
Tartarin, you know how much we scorn corrupt foreign dictators who loot the treasuries of their country.

Does what the Bushies are doing to the U.S. Treasury sound familiar? Could they be corrupt looters, too?

Just wondering. Rolling Eyes

---BumbleBeeBoogie
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 01:16 pm
Clearly the Bush blood-lust was only whetted by his time spent executing innocent and guilty prisoners alike in Texas. Evil or Very Mad

Even thousands of Afghans, Iraqis and DAILY body-bags of U.S. servicemen have failed to quench his Administration's thirst. So much so that they are now resorting to knocking off New Yorkers. Twisted Evil

Who have they chosen for desert? Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
mamajuana
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 10:20 pm
New Jerseyans. Many here suffering from a congestion in the throat, known as the creeping crud. Air was so polluted they never knew how to rate it.
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2003 03:40 am
Two more dead military policemen today, bringing the death toll of American cannon fodder to seventy (and still rising) since Bush declared the war was over - and without the use of his nonexistent W.M.D.s. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Sep, 2003 01:54 am
I see former U.K. Cabinet Minister, Michael Meacher is raising some of the unanswered questions about 9/11, which should have been the job of American politicians and journalists, and over which the Administration continues to demonstrate cover-up and total silence.

Although, knowing the oft-realised homicidal instincts of those in the Administration, such would take considerable bravery on the part of anyone not wishing to risk suffering an unfortunate road accident or convenient suicide. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Sep, 2003 10:03 am
Yeah, if I were in their shoes, I'd tremble too!
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Sep, 2003 03:10 pm
Those interested in knowing what he had to say might wish to take a look at the following link:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1036571,00.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/05/2026 at 05:13:28