Thomas wrote: A bill does not work when its sponsor first promotes it on the Senate floor. It works if and when it's enacted into law, causing the government to spend money money. In the case of the Gore bill, this happened 1991, not 1986.
And yet, the report the bill called for was issued by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in November of 1987. How can that BE?
Moreover, the entire speech was for the National Science Foundation Authorization Act which was in fact signed by Ronald Reagan in 1987. The same National Science Foundation which took over from the ArpaNet in 1984, with computers which were set to receive inputs at 56 kbps-just like the dialup telephone modems in use today.
The "internet"-or more accurately it's precursor-was essentially running at phone modem speed at it's critical points. This gives you some idea just how nascent the internet was at the time.
Once again, I emphasize-Al Gore's bills established the commissions to plan and then later implement the internet we know today.
Thomas wrote: When Wikipedia mentions Gore is irrelevant. However, it is relevant that even 1986 is three years after the Pentagon shut down the civilian part of ARPAnet and the National Science Foundation started up NSFnet, its research network. Even your timeline does not support your account of Gore's influence under the laws of cause and effect.
Your timeline, or rather your math, seems to be off. 1986 is two years after 1984, when the National Science Foundation network took the civilian users from the ARPANet.
Such computers could hardly handle traffic for anything which can be called "the internet" as we know it. Al Gore introduced bills to beef up the National Science Foundation computers with fiber optic cable so they can handle the traffic a real network would require. These bills were finally passed.
Thomas wrote:To be clear: I'm not disputing that the federal government helped in the expansion of the internet.
Thankyou. Considering that the networks the internet grew out of were first the ARPANet, (a Defense Department project), and then the National Science Foundation, (another US Gov't entity), it is nice to know the US Government gets some of the credit for the internet..
Thomas wrote:I'm not disputing that Gore deserves some of the credit for the government's helpful intervention.
Without Gore, the precursor to the internet would be chugging along on 56 kbps, unknown to the general public. Or maybe not even that, since it is impossible to measure the impact his boosterism might have had on his fellow Senators when it came time to vote the money for the NSF to continue the civilian network traffic after the ARPANet went all military.
All these folks out there who are ready to believe the internet was ALL SET UP years before Gore came along in 1986, ask yourself this once again: How come there were no search engines or directories for this supposedly existent network before 1993? The Archie application was a paper handed in by a student at Montreal's McGill University, and when it was put into practice it stayed local for several years. Really, it was 1993 before the first search engines as we know them appeared-and then suddenly a bunch of them appeared.
There was no problem with the programming-"search" functions were around in word processors and other programs for at least a decade. The reason there were no search engines before 1990 at the very earliest-really 1993-is that there was no central network to search.