okie wrote:Infant mortality is just one example of health care that clearly demonstrates one of the most important factors in health care, such as infant mortality, is cultural.
I don't follow you here.
You seem to be saying that American society is going to the dogs (assuming that's what you mean by cultural). All of those divorces, single mums, teenage pregnancies, etc. etc.
Still, it doesn't make sense from a statistical point of view. I agree that it is of some concern if you have such a high rate of teenage pregnancies. But statistically, infant mortality should rather be
lower when you have younger parents than higher.
So if younger age doesn't account for the increased infant mortality rate, it must be something else - and the bit you quoted seems to confirm that:
okie wrote:Increasing the risk of infant mortality in teen births is the fact that teens are least likely to access medical care during the first trimester of pregnancy, during the remainder of their pregnancy, and after their baby is born.
So it's not so much the fact that a high percentage of teens get pregnant (what you seem to call
cultural), but rather that those teens that do get pregnant don't get sufficient health care.
So I guess I'm not quite sure about the thrust of your argument: are you saying that the health care system in the US is really better than it appears to be from infant mortality rates, because you have to take into account that people simply don't have access to good health care?