0
   

Minimum Wage

 
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Jan, 2007 03:02 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
Paying someone who has no skills and works at Burger King or McDonalds more then $6.00 hr makes no sense.


Those get here $8.80 - but usually don't work more than 60 hours per month.


Don't know what the cost of living is in Germany but that is way over paid to flip burgers and cook fries. There is no skill involved when it comes to most jobs that pay no better then min wage.


The level of skill involved doesn't matter, as the jobs which are unskilled are still neccessary for society.

For example, it doesn't take 'skill' to dig ditches, yet ditches still are required to be done by the society who needs to drain water. Therefore the end product of the work is valuable even if the person who perfoms that work is not highly skilled. In fact, much of the 'unskilled labor' that we rely upon can be said to be of more value to society as a whole than the skilled labor force.

Therefore it is unreasonable to say that 8.80 is too much to flip burgers, because flipping burgers is something that needs to get done, and someone has to do it...

Cycloptichorn


Hate to tell you but most ditch digging is done by skilled workers because they drive heavy equipment which does require skill. Worked construction for a while wasn't able to develope the skill to dig ditchs. In fact they only let me swing a hammer which when you start doesn't require skill but in the long run you will develope skill.

On the other hand, flipping burgers isn't a mandatory business that needs to exist. I take that back, people who never learned how to cook would still need burger flippers but if the fast food industry suddenly went under, society as we know it wouldn't starve because we can cook at home.

To say that unskilled workers need more money is almost laughable. Why don't they develope some skills so that they don't have to depend on min wage jobs. I know the company I work for will almost pick up any monkey off of the street to work here. You don't have to have certain skills to work here just the ability to learn and they can teach you just about anything you need to do the job. Fixing people's cable TV issues isn't that hard. What I do requires some skill because not everyone knows how to fix internet issues. It can be taught like most things but they hire people for their experience.

People who flip burgers, wash cars, and bag food are there for reasons and choices they have made. To pay them more then their experience or skill allow is wrong and doing nothing but shifting the burden of supporting these people from the govt to private industry. Market value should push the wages not some politicans who have never worked a real job in their lives.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Jan, 2007 04:37 pm
Baldimo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
Paying someone who has no skills and works at Burger King or McDonalds more then $6.00 hr makes no sense.


Those get here $8.80 - but usually don't work more than 60 hours per month.


Don't know what the cost of living is in Germany but that is way over paid to flip burgers and cook fries. There is no skill involved when it comes to most jobs that pay no better then min wage.


The level of skill involved doesn't matter, as the jobs which are unskilled are still neccessary for society.

For example, it doesn't take 'skill' to dig ditches, yet ditches still are required to be done by the society who needs to drain water. Therefore the end product of the work is valuable even if the person who perfoms that work is not highly skilled. In fact, much of the 'unskilled labor' that we rely upon can be said to be of more value to society as a whole than the skilled labor force.

Therefore it is unreasonable to say that 8.80 is too much to flip burgers, because flipping burgers is something that needs to get done, and someone has to do it...

Cycloptichorn


Hate to tell you but most ditch digging is done by skilled workers because they drive heavy equipment which does require skill. Worked construction for a while wasn't able to develope the skill to dig ditchs. In fact they only let me swing a hammer which when you start doesn't require skill but in the long run you will develope skill.

On the other hand, flipping burgers isn't a mandatory business that needs to exist. I take that back, people who never learned how to cook would still need burger flippers but if the fast food industry suddenly went under, society as we know it wouldn't starve because we can cook at home.

To say that unskilled workers need more money is almost laughable. Why don't they develope some skills so that they don't have to depend on min wage jobs. I know the company I work for will almost pick up any monkey off of the street to work here. You don't have to have certain skills to work here just the ability to learn and they can teach you just about anything you need to do the job. Fixing people's cable TV issues isn't that hard. What I do requires some skill because not everyone knows how to fix internet issues. It can be taught like most things but they hire people for their experience.

People who flip burgers, wash cars, and bag food are there for reasons and choices they have made. To pay them more then their experience or skill allow is wrong and doing nothing but shifting the burden of supporting these people from the govt to private industry. Market value should push the wages not some politicans who have never worked a real job in their lives.


Nice response. I only used Ditch digging b/c it is the classic example of unskilled labor (I was even thinking of backhoes while typing it, eheh).

You say that

Quote:
To pay them more then their experience or skill allow


Well, I would say their experience and skill allow them to make as much money as employers are willing to pay in order to have them employed. We have a minimum wage, because as a society we believe that there is a minimum amount of money which is the agreed-upon equivalent for any job performed by a member of our workforce. This acknowledges that yes, while some jobs are more important than others, and more skilled than others, even unskilled jobs are quite important to society, because we need them to be done in order to provide the infrastructure for the skilled jobs. You could not cut out the unskilled jobs without affecting the entire system (though robotics is working on it).

The manager at McD's is a 'skilled position,' but without his unskilled employees, the place wouldn't stay in business. Therefore their positions are worth a certain amount as well, even if they are pretty easy. Our society determines what the lowest legal level amount is in part to help protect the rights of workers and balance out the problems inherent in non-unionized bargaining situations....

I guarantee that, if it wasn't for minimum wage, you wouldn't be making what you make right now (which is undoubtedly far higher than that). You would be working for less money.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Tai Chi
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Jan, 2007 05:22 pm
(....pssst, just for the record, not every kid wants to grow up to be a doctor or a lawyer.)

Sorry I haven't been back to defend my position but logging on has been impossible lately as I'm sure some of you have experienced. Frankly I don't feel like banging my head against a wall. Some of you just don't seem to get it. Not everyone working minimum wage is young, inexperienced, lazy or clueless. (Just like not every business owner is a greedy, winters-in-the-
Bahamas, it's-all-about-me, just-off-to-the-masseuse prick.) Until the menial world is automated someone has to do unskilled jobs and therefore minimum wage workers deserve a living wage. Period.

Guess that makes me a socialist. I can live with that.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Jan, 2007 06:36 pm
Nobody should attempt to support a family on minimum wage. Most minimum wage earners, at least I would estimate, are young, may live at home, and yet without families. Anyone attempting to support a family without any skills above what brings in a minimum wage should rethink their plans for life.
0 Replies
 
Tai Chi
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Jan, 2007 06:37 pm
Life sometimes gets in the way of the best laid plans.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Jan, 2007 07:21 pm
It has to do with motivation, being at the right place at the right time, and working hard.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 12:40 am
Minimum wage laws are a feel good measure and a great example of political pandering.

There is absolutely no evidence that American corporations are conspiring to keep the minimum wage below a level free markets would establish.

The unintended consequence of statutory minimum wages is a reduction of jobs and an increase in the hiring of illegal aliens.

But it feels good to some for the government to tell those nameless, soulless corporations to pay the American worker a decent wage.

Trouble is that most minimum wage earners don't work for big corporations, and by increasing the minimum wage, the government is forcing otherwise law abiding small businesses to either reduce the number of their employees or to hire more workers "off the books."

Our country, as does most of the world, suffers from an incredible ignorance of the population as respects economics. While we're at it they are all functional physics morons as well because clearly they cannot appreciate the law of cause and effect.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 01:13 am
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Our country, as does most of the world, suffers from an incredible ignorance of the population as respects economics. While we're at it they are all functional physics morons as well because clearly they cannot appreciate the law of cause and effect.


Minimum wage in percent of the average monthly income [2004]:
Quote:
Irland 50,0 %
Luxemburg 49,6 %
Malta 49,0 %
Belgium 46,4 %
Netherlands 46,1 %
Slovenia 44,1 %
Bulgaria 41,0 %
Portugal 40,7 %
Hungary 40,7 %
Latvia 39,1 %
Czech Republic 38,8 %
Lithuania 38,5 %
UK 37,9 %
Spain 37,7 %
Poland 35,1 %
Romania 34,4 %
Slovakia 34,1 %
USA 32,9 %
Estonia 32,4 %

Source:
German wikipedia [countries translated]; there quoted EU-Commission in Schulten et al. 2006: 24.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 01:28 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Our country, as does most of the world, suffers from an incredible ignorance of the population as respects economics. While we're at it they are all functional physics morons as well because clearly they cannot appreciate the law of cause and effect.


Minimum wage in percent of the average monthly income [2004]:
Quote:
Irland 50,0 %
Luxemburg 49,6 %
Malta 49,0 %
Belgium 46,4 %
Netherlands 46,1 %
Slovenia 44,1 %
Bulgaria 41,0 %
Portugal 40,7 %
Hungary 40,7 %
Latvia 39,1 %
Czech Republic 38,8 %
Lithuania 38,5 %
UK 37,9 %
Spain 37,7 %
Poland 35,1 %
Romania 34,4 %
Slovakia 34,1 %
USA 32,9 %
Estonia 32,4 %

Source:
German wikipedia [countries translated]; there quoted EU-Commission in Schulten et al. 2006: 24.


Thank you Walter.

Perhaps you can explain the relevance of these statistics, as it is late I am not inclined to seek out the pearl of your cut and paste wisdom.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 01:49 am
And it's early here :wink:

I only posted that to give an idea how minimum wages in different countries vary in amount compared to what others earn there.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 02:10 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
The level of skill involved doesn't matter, as the jobs which are unskilled are still necessary for society.
Right here you've highlighted the fundamental error in you thinking. "Society" has no business being in this sentence. Jobs are agreements between men, irrespective of society. One needs a job and the other needs a job done. Wage is set at the equilibrium of supply and demand.

20 years ago the KFC in Lake Geneva, WI advertised a higher starting wage than the proposed minimum we're discussing. This was no doubt the result of a shortage of employees willing to work for less. The focus of any legislation if you want to help the poor in this respect should be JOB CREATION. Wages driven upwards by Supply and Demand don't leave the least employable among us with no work at all. Unnaturally high minimum wages do.

In a civil "society" I agree there needs to be a safety net for those who cannot provide for themselves. An intelligently managed "society" should seek to minimize the necessity of this application. Artificially high minimum wages do not accomplish this... and in many ways accomplish the opposite. An example proposal of effective societal management can be found under the heading "more progressive version" HERE :wink:
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 03:05 pm
I get a charge out of those educated who declare that we uneducated, unwashed citizens don't understand our economic system. The driving force of our system was competition, but conserative government has destroyed competition by allowing big business to become multinationals who can set prices to whatever it wants it to be. There used to be thousands of oil companies but are now only hundreds. All business has become like the oil business. Just a few companies control all businesses.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 05:32 pm
rebel, You're actually wrong; small businesses makes up most of the US economy. Small companies make up the largest ratio of the US economy.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 05:34 pm
Many visitors from abroad are surprised to learn that even today, the U.S. economy is by no means dominated by giant corporations. Fully 99 percent of all independent enterprises in the country employ fewer than 500 people. These small enterprises account for 52 percent of all U.S. workers, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). Some 19.6 million Americans work for companies employing fewer than 20 workers, 18.4 million work for firms employing between 20 and 99 workers, and 14.6 million work for firms with 100 to 499 workers. By contrast, 47.7 million Americans work for firms with 500 or more employees.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:13 pm
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Our country, as does most of the world, suffers from an incredible ignorance of the population as respects economics. While we're at it they are all functional physics morons as well because clearly they cannot appreciate the law of cause and effect.


Agreed. Your assertion is confirmed on the thread that I started, titled "Is the Liberal Political Mind one Dimensional?" My premise there is that many effects are related, so that most issues should never be viewed as a single dimension by themselves. Many people may view the minimum wage laws by themselves, as if it does not affect anything else. After all, why isn't it good and decent that people can make more money? My question is, "why not raise the minimum wage to at least $20 per hour then? Wouldn't that be a better wage than $7 and change? The answer to that question of course exposes the fallacy of the scheme to set an artificial wage in the first place. It is nothing more than something to make certain politicians feel better about themselves, but accomplishes little or nothing positive.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Jan, 2007 10:08 pm
Re: Minimum Wage
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Saw a discussion about it on TV a while ago, and thought I would ask -

Is there any actual historical evidence that raising the minimum wage leads to a loss in low-income jobs? I haven't been able to find that anywhere.

........Cycloptichorn


Cyclops, has this been posted? Go down the page to the graph titled:
Unemployment Compared to Minimum Wage (in 2001 dollars)

http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/american_income_taxation.htm

The graph does not prove anything very well, but if you consider higher minimum wage levels as one of the drivers of higher unemployment rates, you would also expect a lag time between the peaks, with minimum wage peaks preceding the unemployment highs, which does occur on the graph, but not well, as it looks to me like the lag time is too long to make a good argument for that? And of course, there are other factors that probably control unemployment to a greater extent.

I do not think the minimum wage levels have ever been set high enough in this country to drastically affect unemployment rates, but if they were, they definitely would.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jan, 2007 12:27 pm
Re: Minimum Wage
okie wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Saw a discussion about it on TV a while ago, and thought I would ask -

Is there any actual historical evidence that raising the minimum wage leads to a loss in low-income jobs? I haven't been able to find that anywhere.

........Cycloptichorn


Cyclops, has this been posted? Go down the page to the graph titled:
Unemployment Compared to Minimum Wage (in 2001 dollars)

http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/american_income_taxation.htm

The graph does not prove anything very well, but if you consider higher minimum wage levels as one of the drivers of higher unemployment rates, you would also expect a lag time between the peaks, with minimum wage peaks preceding the unemployment highs, which does occur on the graph, but not well, as it looks to me like the lag time is too long to make a good argument for that? And of course, there are other factors that probably control unemployment to a greater extent.

I do not think the minimum wage levels have ever been set high enough in this country to drastically affect unemployment rates, but if they were, they definitely would.


In most cases, the equilibrium wage is above the minimum wage already (look at many places advertising now with beginning wages above the minimum wage amounts), so in most situations it really hasn't had much of an impact, if any. It is simply a feel good, look good thing politicians push.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2007 10:24 am
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Minimum Wage
  3. » Page 7
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/29/2024 at 12:23:50