Quote:However, don't you think that there was more involved with Alexandra's dependence of Rasputin than public perception??? I received the impression that there was definitely a dependence there.
Yes, tomasso. I agree Alexandra was very dependent on Rasputin, because he was the only one who could stop her son's hemophiliac episodes.
But the public was unaware of the truth of the situation. As Massie said in his book, the Russian people love children, and if they had known of Alexi's affliction, they probably would've been very understanding.
However, the Romanovs wanted to keep his condition secret, because they feared it would make him appear weak - an unsuitable heir to the throne.
So, the public jumped to some unfortunate conclusions about Alexandra's relationship with Rasputin - which, considering the anti-royal sentiment that was developing - didn't help the royal cause any!
Anyway, I love talking about this stuff! It was such a good book, wasn't it?
Thank you for the recommendation about the Luther book. I'll check it out!