Joint Chiefs Oppose Iraq 'Surge'
'Wash Post' Scoop: Joint Chiefs Oppose Iraq 'Surge'
By E&P Staff
Published: December 19, 2006 9:55 AM ET
likely move by President Bush in favor of sending a new "surge" of troops to Iraq has consumed media interest and speculation in the past week. On Tuesday, veteran Washington Post reporters Robin Wright and Peter Baker, noting that the proposal might mark the most critical decision on Iraq since the 2003 invasion, reveal that the Joint Chiefs of Staff oppose the notion.
The entire article can be found at www.washingtonpsot.com. It opens as follows.
The Bush administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intense debate.
Sending 15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months is one of the central proposals on the table of the White House policy review to reverse the steady deterioration in Iraq. The option is being discussed as an element in a range of bigger packages, the officials said.
But the Joint Chiefs think the White House, after a month of talks, still does not have a defined mission and is latching on to the surge idea in part because of limited alternatives, despite warnings about the potential disadvantages for the military, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House review is not public.
The chiefs have taken a firm stand, the sources say, because they believe the strategy review will be the most important decision on Iraq to be made since the March 2003 invasion.
At regular interagency meetings and in briefing President Bush last week, the Pentagon has warned that any short-term mission may only set up the United States for bigger problems when it ends. The service chiefs have warned that a short-term mission could give an enormous edge to virtually all the armed factions in Iraq -- including al-Qaeda's foreign fighters, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias -- without giving an enduring boost to the U.S military mission or to the Iraqi army, the officials said.
The Pentagon has cautioned that a modest surge could lead to more attacks by al-Qaeda, provide more targets for Sunni insurgents and fuel the jihadist appeal for more foreign fighters to flock to Iraq to attack U.S. troops, the officials said.
It wasn't I that took this thread off topic, however, you chose to single me out with a smarmy chastising on the second page of this thread, you'll excuse me if I find your threat a little disingeneous. 
