2
   

Why not Hiilary Clinton for president?

 
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 11:37 am
Hillary is pretty low on my list. Probably just because I don't like her and prefer to support a liberal.
Vote early
vote often
vote Kucinich.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 02:08 pm
The beauty of electing Hillary is that we get a package deal including Bill.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 04:30 pm
I am with you in spirit Dyslexia (except for the damned electability thing).
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 05:09 pm
I doubt that Kucinich. could get elected even if he were the only one running. Check that.. He would have to be the only
one running to get elected.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 05:10 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
I am with you in spirit Dyslexia (except for the damned electability thing).

Actually, I no longer consider "electability." At this stage in my life I prefer to vote what i think is right. I might think differently were I younger.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 05:21 pm
bm

(reading along here for my own edification.. I'm very curious to know why Hillary Clinton appears to be so disliked by so many Americans. Personal or political reasons, or what .... ? I didn't think that see was that bad, but then, what would I know? Please continue ...)
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 05:26 pm
msolga wrote:
bm

(reading along here for my own edification.. I'm very curious to know why Hillary Clinton appears to be so disliked by so many Americans. Personal or political reasons, or what .... ? I didn't think that see was that bad, but then, what would I know? Please continue ...)


Personal AND political reasons.

I don't like her personality, lack of charm, and poor oratory skills. She isn't going to win anyone over with stirring speeches.

I don't like her history. Too many skeletons, I don't need to hear Republicans going on and on about Whitewater and other crap for another decade, thanks.

Politically, she tries to play both ends against the middle and fails; she doesn't have the triangulation down the way Bill did...

Cheers

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 05:27 pm
msolga wrote:
bm

(reading along here for my own edification.. I'm very curious to know why Hillary Clinton appears to be so disliked by so many Americans. Personal or political reasons, or what .... ? I didn't think that see was that bad, but then, what would I know? Please continue ...)



Hope you have more success getting that answer than I have
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 05:29 pm
au1929 wrote:
msolga wrote:
bm

(reading along here for my own edification.. I'm very curious to know why Hillary Clinton appears to be so disliked by so many Americans. Personal or political reasons, or what .... ? I didn't think that see was that bad, but then, what would I know? Please continue ...)



Hope you have more success getting that answer than I have


You got a complete answer from me not a half an hour after you posted, with several different points; so please refrain from the hyperbole

Reading this thread, it really seems to me that you don't consider any reason not to support Hillary, to be a valid one...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 05:41 pm
Thanks for that, Cycloptichorn.
Interesting.

(I'll continue reading now.)
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 07:56 pm
msolga wrote:
bm

(reading along here for my own edification.. I'm very curious to know why Hillary Clinton appears to be so disliked by so many Americans. Personal or political reasons, or what .... ? I didn't think that see was that bad, but then, what would I know? Please continue ...)


Hillary isn't that bad. I don't dislike her... I just don't want her to be president (or even a candidate) . She made a fine first lady and enough of her consituents seem to think she makes a good Senator that she won the election.

The problem is the question that started this thread is completely wrong. We shouldn't ask "Why not (elect Hillary as president?)? The real question is "Why should Hillary be president"? No one has given me a good reason for this.

I dismiss Hillary as a presidential candidate-- not as a human being or even as a politician.

A presidential candidate I will support will have have the courage and integrity to stand up for the issues I care about. Even candidates with the moral courage to stand up for issues I don't care about get points for having the guts and conviction. On issue after issue, she takes the easy way out and avoids anything that may be politically risky.

The problem with Hillary is that she hasn't shown integrity or courage or even consistancy (except perhaps for one failed bid at health care).

The real fear I have is that because of her star power, and the thrill of having a female candidate, she will eclipse someone who will make a much better candidate and a much better president.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 08:27 pm
Actually, ebrown, I was wondering if in her case being a woman was actually a disadvantage. I mean many (most?) male politicians do some pretty ruthless things, do deals & make all sorts of compromises to further their careers if they are really serious about succeeding. Is it somehow considered worse (from the point of view of her potential supporters, anyway) that she appeared much more "liberal" & progressive in the past and is now seen as selling out in her quest for power? And there's a nagging feeling that electors don't like seeing women politicians act just as tough, be just as able to wheel & deal and be just as incline to make pragmatic compromises as their male conterparts.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 08:33 pm
Things lend themselves to that interpretation so I know where you're coming from, but that doesn't resonate for me with Hillary. The people who say these things are people who admire strength in women as a general concept, people who I've seen walk the walk and not just talk the talk.

Well, let me be more specific. I think she is disliked for a wide variety of reasons, and probably some of them are what you mention. I don't think that's happening with ebrown or Cycloptichorn, to name just two. And when you have feminist liberals like them who dislike her, and then a vast swath of conservatives who hate her passionately, that's when I come in saying that even though I like her fine personally, the deck is stacked against her to such an extent that I really want to find someone else to be the Democratic candidate.

I also very much agree with what Cycloptichorn said earlier (I've said it too I think), that there is something about the prospect of 28 years of governance by the same two last names that makes me itch. Let's move ON.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 08:34 pm
.... & I doubt that being a pushy, ambitious woman would be a winner with ultra-conservative voters, either! :wink:
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 08:42 pm
Thanks. I'm finding it really interesting to see how all you folks see the Hillary question, soz. Never quite "got" it before, but then I'm a long way away from the action.

Sorry to divert your conversation, folks.
Please carry on ...
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 09:56 pm
msolga wrote:
Actually, ebrown, I was wondering if in her case being a woman was actually a disadvantage. I mean many (most?) male politicians do some pretty ruthless things, do deals & make all sorts of compromises to further their careers if they are really serious about succeeding. Is it somehow considered worse (from the point of view of her potential supporters, anyway) that she appeared much more "liberal" & progressive in the past and is now seen as selling out in her quest for power? And there's a nagging feeling that electors don't like seeing women politicians act just as tough, be just as able to wheel & deal and be just as incline to make pragmatic compromises as their male conterparts.


I think that Hillary being a woman is the reason we are having this discussion. If she were a man, she would be considered too mediocre for the white house by everyone.

When considering who should be president we should apply the same standards to women and to men.

I want someone who is tough, politically savvy and can fight for issues I care about.

My problem iwith Hillary isn't that she is a tough women, it is that she isn't a tough person (in the sense of being willing to take decisive positions on important but contentious issues).

This has nothing to do with her being a woman. I am just looking for a candidate with the balls to take a difficult stand on issues outside of a calculated middle position.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 11:00 pm
HC can't be viewed as a man or woman, she's a control freak, she lives eats & breathes power, she needs it like an addict needs a fix. She can't be trusted to run this counntry for the good of the country, only for the good of hillary. She has no core.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Dec, 2006 08:56 am
LoneStarMadam wrote:
HC can't be viewed as a man or woman, she's a control freak, she lives eats & breathes power, she needs it like an addict needs a fix. She can't be trusted to run this counntry for the good of the country, only for the good of hillary. She has no core.


Boy, a person could assume that you have some kind of close personal association with Hillary Clinton. "she's a control freak, she lives eats & breathes power, she needs it like an addict needs a fix." You can tell all this how? If you don't mind, answer with specific examples which prove she is a control freak addicted to power.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Dec, 2006 10:37 am
Eyes & ears are all that's required to know that she's a control freak.
You believe that all the folks here that talk about politicians know them personally? Wow!! Shocked
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Dec, 2006 11:27 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
msolga wrote:
bm

(reading along here for my own edification.. I'm very curious to know why Hillary Clinton appears to be so disliked by so many Americans. Personal or political reasons, or what .... ? I didn't think that see was that bad, but then, what would I know? Please continue ...)


Personal AND political reasons.

I don't like her personality, lack of charm, and poor oratory skills. She isn't going to win anyone over with stirring speeches.

FROM MY OBSERVATION, SHE IS WELL LIKED BY THOSE WHO KNOW HER. SHE IS AN EXCELLENT AND EFFECTIVE SPEAKER, WHO MAKES A GOOD IMPRESSION. SHE WON OVER THOSE IN THE SENATE WITH HER SPEECHES.

I don't like her history. Too many skeletons, I don't need to hear Republicans going on and on about Whitewater and other crap for another decade, thanks.

MOST OF THE CANDIDATES HAVE SKELETONS. EVEN OBAMA HAS A PROBLEM CONCERNING A REAL ESTATE DEAL. WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS THAT WE ELECT AN EXCELLENT PERSON AS PRESIDENT.

Politically, she tries to play both ends against the middle and fails; she doesn't have the triangulation down the way Bill did...

I HAVEN'T SEEN THIS. DO YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFICS?

Cheers

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/30/2024 at 02:08:39