Why not Hiilary Clinton for president?

substitute george w bush for hillary clinton and megalmaianc for socialist and you are slamming hillary for being bush, and you kiss his ass at every opportunity. That's weird.

Hillary Clinton is a socialist, for one thing, the most important thing for my reason of not wanting her to be president. She talks out of both sides of her mouth, she is a firm believer in "win by any means necessary', AND she has proven several times that she can be walked on by a man. She isn't strong enough mentally to run this country. I'm not saying she isn't intelligent enough, she's not strong enough.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Hillary Clinton is a socialist, for one thing, the most important thing for my reason of not wanting her to be president. She talks out of both sides of her mouth, she is a firm believer in "win by any means necessary', AND she has proven several times that she can be walked on by a man. She isn't strong enough mentally to run this country. I'm not saying she isn't intelligent enough, she's not strong enough.

If Hillary Clinton were a socialist, she would have my complete support (except for the unelectability thing).

The problem is to be a socialist, you have to stand for something. Hillary hasn't shown the backbone to stand for any imporant causes.

But Socialist??? You give her way too much credit. Hillary isn't even a true liberal.

The most important point is that you and I (who are on opposite ends of the political spectrum) both agree with the statement "Hillary is for whatever she thinks will be good for Hillary."

The fact that both people on the right and on the left have the same impression of her should be enough to sink her candidacy (at least I hope so).

For the record, I think her attempt to get a measure of socialized health care was one the few worthwhile things she has done. But fixing the health care system will have to be done by someone with more credibility.

But Hillary pisses off people on both ends of the political spectrum. This is not a very good thing for a presidential candidate.

The most important point is that you and I (who are on opposite ends of the political spectrum) both agree with the statement "Hillary is for whatever she thinks will be good for Hillary."

The fact that both people on the right and on the left have the same impression of her should be enough to sink her candidacy (at least I hope so)....

If only you were right....

but, with your definition of socialism most Americans are socialists and a socialist will rightfully win the election.

Hillary is a Senator from New York and she acted as Senator FOR New York not the United States. When she is President she will act for the United States and not only for New York.

talk72000 wrote:

Hillary is a Senator from New York and she acted as Senator FOR New York not the United States. When she is President she will act for the United States and not only for New York.

She hasn't done much for Upstate New York. She concentrates her power base in the city, just like most liberals do.

talk72000 wrote:

Hillary is a Senator from New York and she acted as Senator FOR New York not the United States. When she is President she will act for the United States and not only for New York.

She hasn't done much for Upstate New York. She concentrates her power base in the city, just like most liberals do.

Yet she does elected for senator for New York despite her baggage and unelectability.

talk72000 wrote:

Hillary is a Senator from New York and she acted as Senator FOR New York not the United States. When she is President she will act for the United States and not only for New York.

She hasn't done much for Upstate New York. She concentrates her power base in the city, just like most liberals do.