real lifeQuote: Specimens of known recent origin commonly yield 'dates' of hundreds of millions or even billions of years using various 'dating methods'.
.Outlier data actually occur quite infrequently and they have always had a reason for the error (contamination, adsorption of liquid sample onto substrates , replenishment of radionuclides etc).Your just hanging on to some Creationist myth. The Hell Creek Formation has long been .been established by NON radionuclide methods like magnetism, traditional stratigraphy,structural features, depositional environments etc.
Its apparent that you have to hang on to these beleifs . Im sure that youll post some web site full of garbage about how radionuclide dating is not correct. I understand that you are COMPELLED to believe this, so I wont mess with your beliefs. But please dont pass this around with an air of ascientific incredulity, youll be laughed at for your purposeful obtuseness.
All I have to do is to remind you that we have very compelling non radionuclide data that shows the earth is much older than you YEC's believe (by at least 160 times)
Some facts (apologies to Roger Wiems)
1All of the radiometric data methods agree Errors that occur, only occur in the per cent (low percent) levels, In order to have YEC beliefs correct, these data would have to be orders of magnitude in disagreement
2Thousands of labs all over the earthg do radiometric dating None disagree with the objectively established ages of the earth by remnant radioactive daughter products (IE, ITs really HARD to futx with data from multiple samplings and multiple labs )None of these guys know what their samples represent
3The nuclear clocks have been calibrated since the methods had been discovered around WWII, no discrepencies have been discovered yet
4Radionuclides have been calibrated to other means of dating with no significant errors (were talking about literally millions of individual samples and maybe there are 10 anomalous samples in the entire world. All of these anomalies have been rectified by follow-on sampling)
5 The math for doing the calcs is really easy to understand and do. Its often used in first year physical geology or physics labs.
.