Don't tell me there's no proof for evolution

Something created the cosmos and considering the intelligence within the universe.

Speaking of "poofism"; what is the scientific methodology that began this whole source of life? You know - what started the process of evolution?

Speaking of "poofism"; what is the scientific methodology that began this whole source of life? You know - what started the process of evolution?

I suppose Real will tell us this all came about because of The Flood.

baddog 1 wrote:

Speaking of "poofism"; what is the scientific methodology that began this whole source of life? You know - what started the process of evolution?

Lets see now, if there's a question that can't be answered than it must be supernatural.

That's it!

WOW! Now I have the answer. IT'S GOD.

The Bible told me so.

And all those stupid scientist out there looking for evidence.

Boy oh boy. I sure am glad I'm smart and read the Bible.

Now I know it all.

I asked this before, I wonder how creationist "geologists" make a living? whod trust their advice?

The fact that there is ample evidence along the margins of the basin that show the area was downdropped by a series of catastrophic mobil faults helps the summary analysis. After equilibrium returned and the sites returned to a base level, sedimentation and a new wetland coal forest established itself a few yards above this one. The Illinois coal measures pinch out along their tectonic margins so a"non Creationist" geologist wouldnt waste his clients money by drilling in an area they know is fault blocked.

I asked this before, I wonder how creationist "geologists" make a living? whod trust their advice?

umm.... yeah. i think this creator is just another name for mathematics.

the universe is just numbers if you dig deep enough.
if u dig really deep it all comes down to the numero uno.
even deep and u reach, zero.

farmerman wrote:

I asked this before, I wonder how creationist "geologists" make a living? whod trust their advice?

Are there any professional creationist geologists?

Probably like all "ologists" who believe in creation. By allowing their mind to be open to the possibility of creation - their vision is not so clouded. :wink:

And I would trust their advice at least as much as I would those who do not believe in creation.

Isn't the big bang just clinical words for poofism?

baddog1 wrote:

Probably like all "ologists" who believe in creation. By allowing their mind to be open to the possibility of creation - their vision is not so clouded. :wink:

And I would trust their advice at least as much as I would those who do not believe in creation.

I differentiate between 'creation' and 'creationism'. Creation can be broadly associated with more spiritual beliefs, which don't necessarily conflict with physical evidence.

I tend to associate 'creationism' with a more rigid belief system which in many cases conflict with known science.

Do you feel the same about 'evolution' & 'evolutionism'?

baddog1 wrote:

Do you feel the same about 'evolution' & 'evolutionism'?

I don't know. How do you define evolutionism?

RexRed wrote:

Isn't the big bang just clinical words for poofism?

No.

"...a more rigid belief system which in many cases conflict with unknown science" is probably close.