Don't tell me there's no proof for evolution

Just the same I should think wande. Atheists have a tendency to run on the spot as we have seen. They have no alternative. The position is an absolute one. A Supreme Being is very flexible.

Apologies to people with any form of higher brain function. I needed to get that off my chest. Try not to take it as a stereotypical expression of my personality.

Hmm, I wasn't aware that Evolution was no longer a theory....oh wait, it IS still a theory...

Try to get that into your ******* head if you can, you retarded, worthless piece of ****.

Come on Tex. Nobody fits that description surely. There's their organs for a start. And if all else fails they are a protein package which only need a bit of recycling.

, can someone explain to the TEXAS BOZO, what a theory means in science. Coming from Texas , Im not surprised of his lack of intelligence. ( However, I am always gratified to see that many Texans have, despite the cultural and educational misopportunities that the great state provides, - managed to surmount these misopportunities with good logical thought. (SORRY BigTEXn, you aint one of em)

Duh, gee, it's just a theory. That means it's all a lie and evolutionists are pushing a religious belief in monkeys.

I suspect bigTexN that you, like so many, think that the word "theory" is on par with a guess. This is incorrect. A theory is falsifiable.

T
K
O

A theory in science is different than saying "I have a theory that the Eagles will make it to the Super Bowl."

A scientific theory is an analysis of a set of facts which adamantly lead to an unassailable conclusion. If one wants to assail the conclusion, they must assail the facts. One cannot make up their own facts which lead to a fallacious conclusion made just for the purpose of a belief that it just has to be wrong. In order to "bust the theory," one has to prove the facts are incorrect. This simply hasn't been done with evolution to any plausible effect, making it a revelatory truth that is just as inspiring as anything in the Bible.

The theory of relativity is still a theory even though if it wasn't a truth, the A bomb would not have exploded.

There's been several explosions in knowledge in the last two decades in evolution that clerics, IDers, and most of the religious community want to ignore. First and foremost, they don't want to take the time to read through all the material, digest it, and try to understand it. So they summarily dismiss evolution because "it's just a theory," which is a statement on a sophomoric level without peer.

YA coulda used a less painful example couldnt ya?

LOL. Still better that ID. At least we can test and observe a theory on the Eagles going to the Super Bowl.

T
K
O

will you guys please stop using the EAGLES as an example? Im crying here.

Okay... replace the eagles with... uh... The Kansas City Chiefs.

T
K
O

Sorry about using the Eagles, farmerman. It would have been more appropriate for me to use the Bears as an example.

If you really wanted to make it an extreme statement, you would say that a theory is not the same as saying "I think the Cubs will win the World Series."

I have a theory wande that anti-IDers are muttering witless smalltalk enthusiastically amongst themselves because they are trying to avoid facing up to the irrefutable materialist logic of their athesist beliefs which they had never thought of before. It's a simple example of the escapist mechanism.

The elementary logic which I posted on the "Challenges" thread yesterday and which has gone on the ignore screenout facility, as usual, also applies to any emotional attachment to a business venture in the sporting industry which often results from the need for a vicarious exhibition of machismo and the need to merge the ego in a higher entity than the self.

There does seem to be some scientific evidence to support my theory right under your nose.

Science does not allow the picking and choosing of which aspects of its subject matter to shove up the kids because that is known as corruption of its basic principles, as I feel sure effemm will confirm, and a very bad example to parade before them for no other reason that to further careers and support various sentimental personal attachments of one sort or another.

EEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWGHHHHH!! ya gonna take that Wandel??

I'm becoming alarmed, FM . . . he hasn't risen to the bait . . .

Take it from me, its hard to type with tears in your eyes.

Well, we've equated ID to Creationsim (wolf in sheep's clothing), so Spend is attempting to make-up this equation that materialism equals naturalism.
He's a second-rate magician trying to shift attention away to something irrelevant in order to perform the trick. Materialism is not a synonym of naturalism. A materialist is a person who is chiefly interested in material comfort and is hostile or indifferent to art and culture -- looks like a conservative to me.