sozobe wrote:Craven, sorry about the friendship.
Twas actually my brother, much more than friendship.
sozobe wrote:
Quick thought -- you posted something a while back about your debating style. You were going to change it to avoid these kinds of conflicts. Since I was ready to reach through the screen and throttle you during a discussion on whether nod for yes/ shake for no had anything to do with breastfeeding, and have seen others' hands tremble with the urge to throttle you over any number of non-political, non-religious topics, I'm not sure if giving up those two topics will accomplish anything in particular.
I was actually not gonna post anywhere but there are a few forums where I need to. Namely the tech forums. But yeah, I note that I've gotten into hot water there.
It's not just politics, it's politics plus site politics. I'll be discussing politics elsewhere where there are no complicating issues of site politics. People won't care about my opinion enough to get angry.
sozobe wrote:There are those of us who get over our throttling urges and maintain affection for you, and those who don't. If you want to stop alienating those who are unable to maintain affection through "must-throttle-Craven" episodes, I think a complete personality transplant is in order. And that would make me sad, since you are so ineffably you.
I don't think it's possible, I really dont. I tried but don't really want to be nice all the time, and I don't think I'll ever be patient. But it's not just something I can resolve on my own. Thing is, in places where site politics was not an issue people were far less likely to enter the "must trottle Craven" mode.
I think it underlines a rule I try to ignore. You can't own a large site and participate (there are exceptions of course, but this is not one of them).
So I made a one year resolution to try to keep that rule. I'll be on boards where this is less of an issue but I will try, for the next year, to follow a rule I believe in.