0
   

When Does Life Begin?

 
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:12 pm
Intrepid wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Nah, it's easy to see with so much evidence from your own mouths/posts. You are radicals without any idea what life is all about. You want to impose your personal religious beliefs on people you don't even know, and your main thrust is the cell that doesn't have a brain. Just like you 'all.


You, sir, are talking out of your hat. You have no idea what you are talking about. How do I know that? Simple. I am not a radical. I certainly do know what life is all about. I have NEVER tried to impose my beliefs on anybody else. I have put my beliefs out there, yes. Have I tried to impose them on anybody? No. Have I disagreed with other posters? Yes. The cell that doesn't have a brain? Well, um, err... oh, never mind.


How can anyone impose their religious beliefs on anyone merely by speaking to nuts like CI about what they believe?

How?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:16 pm
How CI? You trippin in a paper box or what?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:19 pm
Bartikus wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Nah, it's easy to see with so much evidence from your own mouths/posts. You are radicals without any idea what life is all about. You want to impose your personal religious beliefs on people you don't even know, and your main thrust is the cell that doesn't have a brain. Just like you 'all.


You, sir, are talking out of your hat. You have no idea what you are talking about. How do I know that? Simple. I am not a radical. I certainly do know what life is all about. I have NEVER tried to impose my beliefs on anybody else. I have put my beliefs out there, yes. Have I tried to impose them on anybody? No. Have I disagreed with other posters? Yes. The cell that doesn't have a brain? Well, um, err... oh, never mind.


How can anyone impose their religious beliefs on anyone merely by speaking to nuts like CI about what they believe?

How?


You have to ask? It's because fanatics like you work to change the laws that protects women; it's the current law called "Roe vs Wade."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:20 pm
Bartikus wrote:
How CI? You trippin in a paper box or what?


What's the matter? No more fanatic-toned rhetoric?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:21 pm
How is talking to you or anyone else here "working to change the law"?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:24 pm
Here; get up to speed on what pro-lifers have been doing to overturn Roe vs Wade.



Thirty years of Roe v. Wade Posted:01.15.03
The upcoming thirty year anniversary of the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the United States is expected to highlight the debate over whether the decision should be upheld or overturned.




TheWhite House
Candidates Pick Up Steam in Run-up to Presidential Primaries

Rallies and marches are planned for Jan. 22, the 30-year anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court case that legalized abortion.
Reading and Discussion Questions

While thousands prepare to reflect on Roe v. Wade's significance, the day is expected to turn up the volume on the debate between those who are pro-choice -- who support keeping abortions legal, and those who are pro-life -- who oppose keeping abortions legal. [/color]

Your ignorance has no bounds.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:26 pm
How is talking to you or anyone else HERE "working to change the law"?

Would you rather us be silenced or something?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:28 pm
A zebra with stripes is a zebra whether it's in a zoo or in the wild.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:29 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
A zebra with stripes is a zebra whether it's in a zoo or in the wild.


Ok zebra's are zebra's.........?

How is talking to you or anyone else HERE "working to change the law"?

Would you rather us be silenced or something?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:39 pm
You afraid more people may become pro life as a result of our talks?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 06:44 pm
That's pro choice baby....Yeah! lol

And that's the way the cookie crumbles.

If it makes you feel better I think these talks will rally more support on your side....... Rolling Eyes Drunk Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 10:48 pm
Bartikus wrote:
You afraid more people may become pro life as a result of our talks?

Based on these talks, I'm certainly not affraid of that.

Take the survey.
K
O
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 11:49 pm
A seed is not a tree.

A potential human being is not a human being.

'Ol Barty-Pooper does not appear headed toward sainthood, but perhaps martyrdom is within his grasp.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 02:00 am
Chumly wrote:
A seed is not a tree.

A potential human being is not a human being.

'Ol Barty-Pooper does not appear headed toward sainthood, but perhaps martyrdom is within his grasp.


You mean like a monkey? lol

A human being with potential.......is.

In the pro choice world....you must first be considered a human being by another human being to be....a human being...when being human is not based on any such thing........in the first place.

If someone else were to regard any one of you as less than human....would that make you as such? Certainly not!

You are human still. Whether it is an attempt to relieve you of your rights or not....a human being you remain! No matter the motivation. You are still human are you not?

Some people in history were regarded as mere human 'lifeforms' of some degree or another by other humans true and true.

Does that matter to the question as to whether they were human?

Certainly not! Like you they were every bit as human!

This is true...and not because I say so...or even because we agree.

It would be true whether I said so or not....and whether we agreed or not.

......for it is self evident.

Maybe another human does not measure up to you or your standards according to your calculations and estimations of them........what does that matter regarding the question as to whether they are human?

It matters not.

"In the pro choice world....you must first be considered a human being by another human being to be....a human being...when being human is not based on any such thing........in the first place."
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 03:44 am
Bartikus wrote:
I don't know much about Chimeras....apparently you know more.


A chimera is any organism that has what scientists call mosaicism. The official definition is an organism that has two or more populations of genetically distinct cells that originated in different zygotes.

This means that if two human zygotes fuse together, you get a chimera.

Quote:
Could I at least read up on them?


The wikipedia article is sufficient enough for a starting point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_%28genetics%29

Now according to your logic, two human lives fuse together to become one. So according to your logic, does that mean one is lost or both are lost? After all, if they hadn't fused together, they would have formed two different human beings with different personalities and experiences. They would have been two very different lives.

But when they are fused together, the one (or two) potential lives (according to your logic) is lost. One is lost for the benefit of the other or maybe both are lost for the benefit of a third new life.

Care to explain how you think your worldview fits the issue of a chimera or even identical twins? Or will you obfuscate for a few more pages? It looks kinda bad for your side if you continue to obfuscate on this issue.

Quote:
I don't murder sperms every day......you don't know what your talking about.


You do destroy sperms cells daily. Your testes don't know when to stop producing sperm cells, so they continuously do it. Obviously, that means older sperm cells have to be destroyed, or rather, they undergo apoptosis.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 04:08 am
Wolf_ODonnell wrote:
Bartikus wrote:
I don't know much about Chimeras....apparently you know more.


A chimera is any organism that has what scientists call mosaicism. The official definition is an organism that has two or more populations of genetically distinct cells that originated in different zygotes.

This means that if two human zygotes fuse together, you get a chimera.

Quote:
Could I at least read up on them?


The wikipedia article is sufficient enough for a starting point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_%28genetics%29

Now according to your logic, two human lives fuse together to become one. So according to your logic, does that mean one is lost or both are lost? After all, if they hadn't fused together, they would have formed two different human beings with different personalities and experiences. They would have been two very different lives.

But when they are fused together, the one (or two) potential lives (according to your logic) is lost. One is lost for the benefit of the other or maybe both are lost for the benefit of a third new life.

Care to explain how you think your worldview fits the issue of a chimera or even identical twins? Or will you obfuscate for a few more pages? It looks kinda bad for your side if you continue to obfuscate on this issue.

Quote:
I don't murder sperms every day......you don't know what your talking about.


You do destroy sperms cells daily. Your testes don't know when to stop producing sperm cells, so they continuously do it. Obviously, that means older sperm cells have to be destroyed, or rather, they undergo apoptosis.


So I don't destroy with intent...which would be different. Murder is usually associated with humans (as the victim) with the premeditated intent (of a human) to kill.

No intent on the part of the mother is involved with a chimera's formation.(kinda like I don't intend my sperms to die...they just do)

Is the chimera human?

If the mother aborts the chimera is her intent to kill the chimera involved?

This would resemble murder more than my sperms dying off ....right? It might be debatable as to whether a chimera is human, but there is surely intent with abortion.

You can't say that regarding me and my spermies! Laughing

It is not my logic alone that leads me to truth. But if you want to use logic alone...be my guest.

I don't recommend it.

You can say "according to my logic" until you are blue in the face. I'm not Spock or a computer. I'm human!

Are you running on just logic?......h-u-m-a-n....l-i-f-e-f-o-r-m.......beep. beep. beep? Laughing

http://www.barbneal.com/wav/trektos/spock/spock03.wav

http://www.mattsmoviesounds.co.uk/sounds/vulcan.wav

Shocked Laughing
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 05:14 am
Bartikus wrote:
So I don't destroy with intent...which would be different. Murder is usually associated with humans (as the victim) with the premeditated intent (of a human) to kill.

No intent on the part of the mother is involved with a chimera's formation.(kinda like I don't intend my sperms to die...they just do)


It also requires intent with malice. Abortion in general does not fit this definition.

Quote:
Is the chimera human?


Only when its born. Now would you care to answer the question I proposed to you? Or will you avoid it like the coward you are? Is it because you cannot reconcile with the facts of chimeras and identical twins with your beliefs?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 05:31 am
Wolf_ODonnell wrote:
Bartikus wrote:
So I don't destroy with intent...which would be different. Murder is usually associated with humans (as the victim) with the premeditated intent (of a human) to kill.

No intent on the part of the mother is involved with a chimera's formation.(kinda like I don't intend my sperms to die...they just do)


It also requires intent with malice. Abortion in general does not fit this definition.

Quote:
Is the chimera human?


Only when its born. Now would you care to answer the question I proposed to you? Or will you avoid it like the coward you are? Is it because you cannot reconcile with the facts of chimeras and identical twins with your beliefs?


Any malice OR intent with my sperms? Nope. Then abortion more resembles it.

I already answered.

humans beget humans....and not because I say so or even because you agree!

I do not see you calling me a coward to my face....brave one!
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 05:53 am
Wolf_ODonnell wrote:
Bartikus wrote:
So I don't destroy with intent...which would be different. Murder is usually associated with humans (as the victim) with the premeditated intent (of a human) to kill.

No intent on the part of the mother is involved with a chimera's formation.(kinda like I don't intend my sperms to die...they just do)


It also requires intent with malice. Abortion in general does not fit this definition.

Quote:
Is the chimera human?


Only when its born. Now would you care to answer the question I proposed to you? Or will you avoid it like the coward you are? Is it because you cannot reconcile with the facts of chimeras and identical twins with your beliefs?


What facts regarding chimeras and twins do you speak of? Scientific facts?

Are they all in? That's it? Nothing more to discover scientifically regarding chimeras or twins?

Or do you imply there is a problem regarding my beliefs and the current scientific understanding of chimeras and identical twins? So what?

Have you lost your mind?

Science does'nt have all the facts in regarding what life is let alone chimeras.....according to you!
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 06:04 am
Bartikus wrote:
Any malice OR intent with my sperms? Nope. Then abortion more resembles it.

I already answered.

humans beget humans....and not because I say so or even because you agree!


That answers nothing. You said that human life begins at conception. Fair enough? Right, so if two oocytes are fertilised, according to you, then two lives are formed? Right so far? If those are fused together to form a chimera, then what happens to the two lives? Do they become one or does one die for the other?

If one oocyte is fertilised, one human life is created, according to you, right? If it then splits, does that mean the twins, according to your logic, are half a human each?

If you don't answer, I will assume you think twins are half-human and chimeras are superhuman.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » When Does Life Begin?
  3. » Page 121
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 06/26/2025 at 11:14:04