1
   

Any serious Christians left?

 
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 09:20 pm
echi wrote:
Arella.

Your rights are not in question. Your beliefs are in question.

You obviously have the right to keep your beliefs all to yourself, but why would you?


If you want me to keep them to myself, stop asking me questions! It's a two way street here, Echi. Laughing
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 09:29 pm
Arella Mae wrote:

I have not asked anyone on this forum to accept my beliefs. Not once!



[url=http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2347649#2347649]Arella Mae[/url] wrote:
maporsche wrote:
Arella Mae wrote:
And if it offends me, then it does concern me and since you are the one that caused the offense I'd say that is between me and you :wink: .


What was between me and you was the improper use of YOUR name. Which you'll notice I've corrected.

The improper use of god's name is between god and myself.

If you're offended, then that only concerns you, I did not cause the offense, you did. I may have offended god, but that is not the same as offending you. You have the sole power to choose what you will and will not be offended at.


I am offended when anyone uses vulgar language. I consider what you did vulgar language; therefore, you offended me by using it.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 09:34 pm
That's pretty pathetic timber. I'm disappointed in you. Crying or Very sad

So should I then say that others trying to convince me that I am wrong is imposing their beliefs on me? Are they trying to get me to accept what they believe? :wink:
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 09:42 pm
Arella Mae wrote:
echi wrote:
Arella.

Your rights are not in question. Your beliefs are in question.

You obviously have the right to keep your beliefs all to yourself, but why would you?


If you want me to keep them to myself, stop asking me questions! It's a two way street here, Echi. Laughing


Please read it again.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 09:47 pm
Arella Mae wrote:
So should I then say that others trying to convince me that I am wrong is imposing their beliefs on me? Are they trying to get me to accept what they believe? :wink:

Irrelevant; what others may or may not have done has nothing to do with your having been shown to have done precisely that you said you had not done.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 09:50 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Arella Mae wrote:
So should I then say that others trying to convince me that I am wrong is imposing their beliefs on me? Are they trying to get me to accept what they believe? :wink:

Irrelevant; what others may or may not have done has nothing to do with your having been shown to have done precisely that you said you had not done.


Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 09:51 pm
echi wrote:
Arella Mae wrote:
echi wrote:
Arella.

Your rights are not in question. Your beliefs are in question.

You obviously have the right to keep your beliefs all to yourself, but why would you?


If you want me to keep them to myself, stop asking me questions! It's a two way street here, Echi. Laughing


Please read it again.


Like I said, I'm done. I tried. You understand or you don't.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 10:40 pm
Arella Mae wrote:
echi wrote:
Arella.

Your rights are not in question. Your beliefs are in question.

You obviously have the right to keep your beliefs all to yourself, but why would you?


I honestly do not understand why the simplicity of this is escaping so many. But I am going to try with YOU this one last time.

I never said this was about my right to vote! It is about my right to vote using whatever decision process I choose in voting on an issue, ANY ISSUE! And as long as you or anyone else tells me I have to vote in a certain way or keep a certain thing in mind, then yes, you are trying to take away my right!

Arella, please try to understand. I have never told you that you have to vote in any certain way. I have not told you what to believe. In no way have I attempted to take away your rights.

I am only trying to understand why you believe what you believe and why you would vote a certain way on certain issues. That's part of living in a democratic society, and I assumed that was the reason for your participation on these forums.

Quote:
I am not giving up my right to vote my conscience for someone else's right, which is exactly what I would be doing if I voted for something I do not agree with, condone, believe in, like or whatever word you would put to it. Everyone's rights are of EQUAL value! EQUAL!

When I have asked you to help me understand your reasoning, you usually respond by stating that it is your belief, or that you don't agree, or can't condone, or whatever. But you fail to answer my question. What's more, you seem to not even understand the question. Do you understand, now?

Quote:
I have not asked anyone on this forum to accept my beliefs. Not once! If you have questions about my faith I do try to answer them. But you cannot deny that some pretty nasty things have been said because of "what I believe in". Now, how does that differ from making derogatory statements about someone's gender? Race? or Sexual Preference? And please don't give me that line about it's because religion is a choice. I don't care to hear it. It's a choice, yes. One I have made.

I can't tell you how many times I've heard that Christians should be locked up, shot, etc. for their beliefs. People think Christianity is dangerous so they want to wipe Christians off the face of the earth. Now, if these statements don't apply to you specifically (or anyone else specifically) then don't take them to heart.

If you don't mean it to apply to me, specifically, then why did you include it in your response to my post?
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 10:47 pm
Arella Mae wrote:
echi wrote:
Arella Mae wrote:
echi wrote:
Arella.

Your rights are not in question. Your beliefs are in question.

You obviously have the right to keep your beliefs all to yourself, but why would you?


If you want me to keep them to myself, stop asking me questions! It's a two way street here, Echi. Laughing


Please read it again.


Like I said, I'm done. I tried. You understand or you don't.


Please read it again, SLOWLY.
0 Replies
 
anton bonnier
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 10:55 pm
Arella Mae.
What are you frighten of ?. Do you fear if you were to question your beliefs in the bible is from the fear of what your god will do to you, or is it the fear, that accepting a logical, reasonable statement as the truth about your beliefs, will kill your god off ?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 10:58 pm
echi wrote:
Arella, please try to understand. I have never told you that you have to vote in any certain way. I have not told you what to believe. In no way have I attempted to take away your rights.


Perhaps it's kind of like Timber was pointing out to me? Now, I didn't feel as though I was trying to get anyone to actually accept my beliefs but it appears Timber feels differently about that assessment. So, perhaps I am incorrect, Echi. If you are honestly do not harbor any of that intent (changing my rights, whether by words, deeds, etc.) then please accept my apology.

But once it gets to asking the same questions over and over again and I keep giving you the same answers it feels like I'm being pushed. If I am wrong here also, then I do apologize to you.


Quote:
I am only trying to understand why you believe what you believe and why you would vote a certain way on certain issues. That's part of living in a democratic society, and I assumed that was the reason for your participation on these forums.


And I have absolutely no problem whatsoever with discussing this with you and sharing my views. My objection comes in when the namecalling starts. You have not been guilty of that, Echi, and I do appreciate it.

Quote:
When I have asked you to help me understand your reasoning, you usually respond by stating that it is your belief, or that you don't agree, or can't condone, or whatever. But you fail to answer my question. What's more, you seem to not even understand the question. Do you understand, now?


Maybe I don't understand because I thought I did answer your question. Which question specifically are you asking about? I'm a bit lost here......

Quote:
If you don't mean it to apply to me, specifically, then why did you include it in your response to my post?


I put that in this post because it is not just you reading it. But if you could answer that question for me I'd be glad to hear it.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 11:01 pm
Quote:
You obviously have the right to keep your beliefs all to yourself, but why would you?


Quote:
Please read it again, SLOWLY.


Echi, I am wondering if perhaps I mistook the tone of this question? I took it as a sarcastic remark. If I am incorrect, please tell me and I will readdress the question.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 11:08 pm
anton bonnier wrote:
Arella Mae.
What are you frighten of ?. Do you fear if you were to question your beliefs in the bible is from the fear of what your god will do to you, or is it the fear, that accepting a logical, reasonable statement as the truth about your beliefs, will kill your god off ?


Damn. That's pretty rough, anton! Surprised I just want to understand her beliefs. . . I don't reckon she needs to question them.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 11:09 pm
anton bonnier wrote:
Arella Mae.
What are you frighten of ?. Do you fear if you were to question your beliefs in the bible is from the fear of what your god will do to you, or is it the fear, that accepting a logical, reasonable statement as the truth about your beliefs, will kill your god off ?


You have a whole 61 posts on this forum...........................Rolling Eyes Laughing ............logical, reasonable? Hmm, are you implying I'm not already accepting something logical or reasonable? That would be according to "your" standards I presume" Rolling Eyes Laughing ...........a whole 61 posts and you know me? Rolling Eyes Laughing

I have done research (even a thread on A2K) to learn more about the homosexuality issue. I admitted then it was a bit frightening to actually be testing what I believed. I did it anyway. I did it because I felt it was the right thing to do. I have a better understanding of how people in this situation in life think and feel because they shared that with me. I'm willing to learn. So, please, take some time to get to know me before you decide anything? Laughing
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 12:40 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
You're as blind as a bat; your attempt to take away rights of others is the issue; not your right to vote.


CI,

You have told us many times and in no uncertain terms that you apply your standard of right and wrong to nobody but yourself.

So why are you implying that AM is doing anything wrong?

Is she not free to do whatever she wishes, without any obligation to meet your standard?

In short, what business is it of yours what she does, since you have told us that your standard is not applicable to her, or any other but you?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 06:50 am
I can't figure it - near as I can tell, some people just like to bust on Arella.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 06:55 am
From the very same people who insist that they live in the land of the free. Free as long as you agree with them, I suppose.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 07:04 am
Intrepid wrote:
From the very same people who insist that they live in the land of the free. Free as long as you agree with them, I suppose.

How about free to fight against the type of oppression the 'moral majority' represents?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 07:06 am
Doktor S wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
From the very same people who insist that they live in the land of the free. Free as long as you agree with them, I suppose.

How about free to fight against the type of oppression the 'moral majority' represents?


How about the type of oppression you are representing? It seems it depends on whose bull is being gored.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 07:31 am
OK, apparently there are a few broad basic points of view that are expressed here:

Anyone is entitled to vote for whomever he wants- I don't think that most anyone would disagree with that, even though they might not agree with the choice of the person making a particular decision.

A person needs to vote his conscience, based on his moral/religious choices, using his particular holy book as his moral compass. A particular vote would curtail the rights of some individuals, although granting those people these rights would not harm anyone else.

A person needs to vote his conscience, bearing in mind that the Constitution, and not some religious book, is the bottom line in assessing what is appropriate for the country. This vote might go against some of the teachings of the religious book, although it would not cause harm to the people who are opposed to it.

In other words, if one considers the Constitution as his moral compass, he would vote for the rights of ALL people. Granting a certain right to some people, would not affect people who disagree with this right, except in possibly an emotional way.

For instance, let's consider abortion, and the people who are seeking to overturn its legality. If abortions were to become illegal, the rights of many women would be abrogated. For those who don't approve of abortion, whether on religious or other grounds, they are free NOT to have one.

Gay marriage- This would allow a committed gay couple the same rights as other couples. It would not force people who disapprove of homosexuality to marry persons of their own sex.

Gambling- This would allow the right of people to gamble to do so. It would not force anyone else to frequent places of gambling if they disapprove, or simply don't care for the activity.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 11:02:40