littlek wrote:Finn is swamping the thread in much the same way as the news gets swamped by other more stupid and meaningless stories.
So, you feel that when you come onto a thread I started and start to act like a pain in the butt, that I should just ignore you? Fat chance buddy.
How butch of you littlek.
In fact I neither think you should nor hope you will ignore me. That would truly be silly. I merely pointed out that this is your option if you feel my comments are not worthy of a response. I deliberately refrained from accusing you of any nefarious intent and took great pains not to make my comments personal towards you. I regret that you, obviously, took them that way, but it does not undermine the comments themselves.
If you truly believe that my design or simply my effect was to bury the jewel of your observation in stupid and meaningless commentary then even so there remains a lesson to be learned by your response and those of others.
What makes the media inundate us with salacious stories of dubious public importance? We like them. We increase their ratings when they dish them out to us. Obviously certain posters in this thread, irrespective of how meaningless they believe my posts to be, like to respond to them. Oh, I suppose some may contend that they find it their civic duty to call me out, but that is really so much crap. They enjoy mixing it up and I gave them what they thought was an easy target.
My commentary may not have been in lock step with your vision for this thread but so what? Since when has there been an inviolate rule that thou must not riff on a original posting? The simple fact remains that I was happy to limit my observations to my first. You felt the need to respond. Good for you! I suppose my mistake was in not realizing that inherent in your response was the command to cease and desist. I mistakenly took it as an invitation to debate. How dense of me.