THE DANGER OF GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES

Advocate wrote:

Oral, you are dead wrong on Miller.

Nope. Afraid not.

Advocate wrote:

Thus, the Supreme Court clearly states that the second amendment provides for the right to bear in the context of a militia.

Which is pretty much what I already told you...... Very Happy

0 Replies

I gather then that you feel an individual does NOT have an unfettered right to bear arms.

But since you don't know what you are talking about, one has to wonder what you think.

0 Replies

Advocate wrote:

I gather then that you feel an individual does NOT have an unfettered right to bear arms.

Depends on what "unfettered" means.

Advocate wrote:

But since you don't know what you are talking about, one has to wonder what you think.

You shouldn't run around falsely accusing people of your own ignorance (especially in the very same thread where you demonstrate your ignorance so graphically). Rolling Eyes

0 Replies

I just discovered my company has a "no weapons" policy, though they don't post it at the door. I'm going to have to seriously start petitioning to change that, though I may have to do it anonymously. Retarded rule anyway...

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

I just discovered my company has a "no weapons" policy, though they don't post it at the door. I'm going to have to seriously start petitioning to change that, though I may have to do it anonymously. Retarded rule anyway...

Um, why?

Do you feel that you are in fear for your life at work - to the point where you need a weapon?

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Actually, yes I do. You have no idea.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Actually, yes I do. You have no idea.

Sounds like either:

A, you need a new job, or

B, you're just sort of a fearful, weak guy.

If you're not posting from Iraq, and you're not a cop, you don't need a gun.

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Cycloptichorn wrote:

If you're not posting from Iraq, and you're not a cop, you don't need a gun.

Americans are free people. We don't have to need a gun. We just have to decide that we want one.

0 Replies

cj has a point. As long as our society allows the mentally disturbed and other dangerous people ready access to guns, there will people in the workplace who may go postal at any time. I think that most of us can think of people who fit this description. There is no requirement that the rest of us stand around like sheep waiting for the slaughter.

0 Replies

Cycloptichorn wrote:

cjhsa wrote:
Actually, yes I do. You have no idea.

Sounds like either:

A, you need a new job, or

B, you're just sort of a fearful, weak guy.

If you're not posting from Iraq, and you're not a cop, you don't need a gun.

Cycloptichorn

Again, you have no clue. But that is nothing new.

0 Replies

oralloy wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
If you're not posting from Iraq, and you're not a cop, you don't need a gun.

Americans are free people. We don't have to need a gun. We just have to decide that we want one.

Deciding that you want something isn't a good reason to allow someone to have something, sorry.

For example, I've decided that I'd like a tank, three pipe bombs and a grenade launcher.

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
Actually, yes I do. You have no idea.

Sounds like either:

A, you need a new job, or

B, you're just sort of a fearful, weak guy.

If you're not posting from Iraq, and you're not a cop, you don't need a gun.

Cycloptichorn

Again, you have no clue. But that is nothing new.

Great answer, as usual from you.

I've known many tough people in my life, and none of them needed a gun to feel secure in their life. Only the weak rely upon a weapon, especially to the extent which you seem to.

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

God created man. Abe Lincoln freed them. Sam Colt made them equal.

0 Replies

Hey Cyclops, the last time I checked, only 12 people had licenses to carry concealed firearms within the city of San Francisco.

One of them is Diane Feinstein.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

God created man. Abe Lincoln freed them. Sam Colt made them equal.

They were already equal. All Colt did was give those with weak minds a crutch.

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Only those with weak minds would favor gun control.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Only those with weak minds would favor gun control.

That was a weak comeback, not surprising..

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Hey Cyclops, the last time I checked, only 12 people had licenses to carry concealed firearms within the city of San Francisco.

One of them is Diane Feinstein.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

cjhsa wrote:
Hey Cyclops, the last time I checked, only 12 people had licenses to carry concealed firearms within the city of San Francisco.

One of them is Diane Feinstein.

So what?

Way to f*ck up the quote boxes, genius

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Cycloptichorn wrote:

oralloy wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
If you're not posting from Iraq, and you're not a cop, you don't need a gun.

Americans are free people. We don't have to need a gun. We just have to decide that we want one.

Deciding that you want something isn't a good reason to allow someone to have something, sorry.

When it comes to something we have the Constitutional right to have (such as an automatic rifle), it is indeed good enough.

In addition, when it is something that people are legally allowed to have (such as a concealed handgun if they choose to get a permit), it is also good enough.

And when it comes to perfectly reasonable requests (like a change in company policy to allow concealed carry on the premises with a valid state permit), it is also good enough.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

For example, I've decided that I'd like a tank, three pipe bombs and a grenade launcher.

You should be able to get the tank no problem if you can afford it. No such luck on the pipe bombs. The grenade launcher will depend mostly on what state you live in.

0 Replies

THE DANGER OF GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know