1
   

Damn you Walmart!!!

 
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 08:29 am
jp, I've been talking about Walgreens in the same vein throughout this thread. It isn't just Walmart, but Walmart continues to branch out into new areas of the marketplace. All big-box stores have the same philosophy, but Walmart tends to lead the way into new marketplaces and the other big-box outlets follow. I'll support a local hardware store over Home Depot, a small office supply retailer over Office-Max (if I can find one!) a local boutique over Gap, you name it... if there is a small shop-owner trying to provide local service to a community, then I will support that shop over any big-box retailer.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 08:34 am
I'm confused by what I read in my paper today.

It says that the average Walmart savings on a 4.00 (sorry, my dollar sign doesn't work) perscription will be 20% to 90% so we're really only talking about a few dollars.

Then the article quotes someone who thinks he's going to be getting his 100.00 perscription for 4.00.

Then it goes on to say that the average generic perscription cost nationwide is 28.75. I have a feeling that the drugs that throw the curve that high will not be included in the deal.

I think a lot of people will dash into Walmart expecting their drugs to cost 4.00 and they will find themselves very disappointed.

I think the whole thing is a great marketing ploy but not really a very big deal at all.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 08:56 am
jpinMilwaukee wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
However, the move may have little, if any, effect on the price consumers pay for their prescriptions. That's because most of the generics on Wal-Mart's discounted list either are not the most widely prescribed or already are heavily discounted by many health insurers.

Wal-Mart today will begin selling 30-day supplies of nearly 300 generic drugs for $4 per prescription at its stores in the Tampa Bay area of Florida. It said it plans to roll out the new prices at other Florida stores by January and to "as many states as possible" next year, though it provided no specifics.


Your statement is nearly entirely false. From the article:

Quote:
The drugs will be sold for as little as $4 for a month's supply and include some of the most commonly prescribed medicines such as Metformin, a popular generic drug used to treat diabetes, and the high blood pressure medicine Lisinopril.


That last bolded sentence contradicts your statements that it is not widely used drugs or didn't give any specifics. Sure many of the drugs may be already deeply discounted, but in my checkbook the less I have to pay the better.

As far as consumers not seeing a price difference:

Quote:
Late Thursday, rival Target Corp. said it would match Wal-Mart's prices at its stores in the Tampa Bay area.


Seems to me that competition has already lowered prices in rival target and will probably do the same soon in Walgreens. That is a price differenct that the consumers will see and will put even more pressure on the drug companies to lower their prices.

Yes of course jp, you're always right especially when you're wrong.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 08:59 am
JPB wrote:
jp, I've been talking about Walgreens in the same vein throughout this thread. It isn't just Walmart, but Walmart continues to branch out into new areas of the marketplace. All big-box stores have the same philosophy, but Walmart tends to lead the way into new marketplaces and the other big-box outlets follow. I'll support a local hardware store over Home Depot, a small office supply retailer over Office-Max (if I can find one!) a local boutique over Gap, you name it... if there is a small shop-owner trying to provide local service to a community, then I will support that shop over any big-box retailer.


And that is entirely your perogative, JPB.

However, for those who don't have the income, access or desire to go spend more money at multiple stores, Wal-mart/walgreens/target/etc. are a great opportunity to save time and money. That is what makes this ecomony run... options and competition.

Oh... and do you think that the ma and pa hardware store is really paying their clerks much (or any) more than Walmart is paying theirs?
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:09 am
Boomer, the high priced drugs may not be on the list right away, but this is a step in the right direction. You can't expect them to start selling every drug for $4 overnight. But this will start to put pressure on the drug comapanies to start reducing their costs as well.

If you read the up on the subject, you'll find tha Wal-mart is able to reduce their prices because they have made thier process more efficient. They cut out the middle distribution chain and went directly to the supplier, automating some of their warehousing and ironing out inefficiencies in their operation. No body is going out of business. No body is loosing jobs.

If this leads to similar changes in the pharmecutical companies that supply Wal-mart, there is real opportunity for change.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:12 am
dyslexia wrote:

Yes of course jp, you're always right especially when you're wrong.


And your posts are always insubstantial, even when you're trying to be funny.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:17 am
There isn't a Walmart within 50 miles of my house (Portland's strict land use laws don't favor such stores) so shopping there really isn't an option, or a concern for me. I haven't seen the effects of their business on the community where I live but I understand their impact is huge.

I do know people who "a few bucks" makes a big difference to, though and I understand why they love Walmart. The whole forest from the trees argument doesn't mean much to people when they are simply trying to survive.

I don't shop there and I probably wouldn't even if there were one handy. Still, I have a hard time denying anyone else the right to.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:39 am
boomerang wrote:
There isn't a Walmart within 50 miles of my house (Portland's strict land use laws don't favor such stores) so shopping there really isn't an option, or a concern for me. I haven't seen the effects of their business on the community where I live but I understand their impact is huge.


I think the "Destructive nature" of Wal-mart has been overstated. They will never replace the small medium or large businesses that offer higher quality items at higher quality prices with specialized services. Walmart fits the niche of cheap and inexpensive... and they do a fantastic job at it.

boomerang wrote:
I do know people who "a few bucks" makes a big difference to, though and I understand why they love Walmart. The whole forest from the trees argument doesn't mean much to people when they are simply trying to survive.

I don't shop there and I probably wouldn't even if there were one handy. Still, I have a hard time denying anyone else the right to.


I think that is a very reasonable response.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:39 am
Is Walmart doing pharmaceutical researches? Or paying others for doing so?
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:41 am
No. Why would they do that?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:44 am
boomerang wrote:
I'm confused by what I read in my paper today.

It says that the average Walmart savings on a 4.00 (sorry, my dollar sign doesn't work) perscription will be 20% to 90% so we're really only talking about a few dollars.

Then the article quotes someone who thinks he's going to be getting his 100.00 perscription for 4.00.

Then it goes on to say that the average generic perscription cost nationwide is 28.75. I have a feeling that the drugs that throw the curve that high will not be included in the deal.

I think a lot of people will dash into Walmart expecting their drugs to cost 4.00 and they will find themselves very disappointed.

I think the whole thing is a great marketing ploy but not really a very big deal at all.


The new deal at Walmart will affect those drugs, for which there is a generic. As you know, the generics are cheaper than the brands and for many, if not all States, the generic is mandated on any Rx, not indicated otherwise by an MD or DO.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:45 am
Noddy24 wrote:
Can your inner city clerks afford their meds at Walmart if they work at Walmart?

Pharmacy and pharmacy staff at most, if not all pharmacies in the US get a reduction on all their medications purchased at the store.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:47 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
If such happened here in Germany, government and health insurance comapnies would be happy. The pharmacy companies, pharmacies and consumers (most people don't like generic drugs, thinking, the original are better - besides, it really doesn't matter since paid by health insurance, they think) not really.

Most health insurance in the USA, also comes with the option for drug coverage. We also have online pharmacy networks that provide another method to reduce drug cost.

However, with 65,000 prescription drugs in an average pharmacy, 300 would be of a big deal. (115,000 in my local one, since they've got to have on stock drugs for various specialist doctors located nearby as well).
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:51 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
If such happened here in Germany, government and health insurance comapnies would be happy. The pharmacy companies, pharmacies and consumers (most people don't like generic drugs, thinking, the original are better - besides, it really doesn't matter since paid by health insurance, they think) not really.

However, with 65,000 prescription drugs in an average pharmacy, 300 would be of a big deal. (115,000 in my local one, since they've got to have on stock drugs for various specialist doctors located nearby as well).


Pharmacies in the USA don't carry 65,000 prescription drugs at any one time. The only ones that might approximate that number are those associated with VA hospitals and those which are ambulatory pharmacies. There is a basic formulary and when
drugs are required from outside that formulary, they are shipped in from other sources. Also we have many compounding pharmacies that make needed medications.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:53 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Oh, and those 65,000 (or 115,000) are actually in the pharmacy, I wasn't referring to the market.

65,000 - I just looked it up - is not the average but the minimum in a German pharmacy.


what's that reference for the number "65000"? There are no pharmacies in the USA, which carry that number ON SITE.

Do your pharmacies carry chemotherapeutics?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:54 am
edgarblythe wrote:
squinney wrote:
291 drugs out of 65,000 ... Probably the cheapest generics to begin with. Not meaning to be a pessimist, but that's piddly by comparison to the fact that all those shoppers will be walking the aisles while waiting for their scripts to be filled.

Wal-Mart didn't become Wal-Mart by giving things away. I still hate seeing one go up in place of a Mom & Pop.


ditto


The cheapest generics used in the US aren't even manufactured in the US.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:57 am
JPB wrote:
another ditto

If it's a choice between Walmart and Walgreen's or other mega pharmacy chain then I don't see much difference in which one someone chooses. On the other hand, if it's a choice between a privately run pharmacy and either of the other two, I'd rather give my business to the smaller store even if I have to pay more.

The low prices don't stay low forever. Then tend to go up once the small local competition has dried up.


You can certainly pay more if you wish to and you can. Most people, would like to save money and thus tend to buy drugs online or the generics at retail, chain pharmacies.

I am Walgreen stock holder, but I don't buy my drugs at Walgreens and thats for strictly PROFESSIONAL reasons.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 09:58 am
mac11 wrote:
It's an effective business move. And Florida is the best place to start.

(I still hate Walmart.)


Florida is the best place to start, because it has a very large elderly population and many of these seniors need a variety of medications to stay alive and well.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 10:00 am
Green Witch wrote:
Jpin, it's not the lower prices that's the problem- it's the motive behind it. Walmart is not doing this to help people, it's doing it to become a pharmaceutical giant with no competition. Walmart wants to be America's communist party, no competition for your vote.

If the drug companies offered the same deal to all pharmacies that it is offering to Walmart I would be all for it, but that is not the case. Walmart is notorious for "putting the screws" on it's suppliers, destroying fair competition and basically becoming the monopoly in the marketplace. It makes for less choices in the long run. The United States of Walmart is not what we should aspire to.


All BS about Wal-Mart. If you don't want to shop there, for God's sake go elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Sep, 2006 10:01 am
detano inipo wrote:
Walmart stands for all the things I cannot accept.
.
So I decided never to buy there; it's easy. I have never been inside a Walmart store. (or in a MacDonalds junkfood restaurant)


Sounds like you live a rther lively life.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Leveraged Loan - Discussion by gollum
Web Site - Discussion by gollum
Corporate Fraud - Discussion by gollum
Enron Scandal - Discussion by gollum
Buying From Own Pension Fund - Discussion by gollum
iPhones - Question by gollum
Paycheck Protection Plan - Question by gollum
Dog Sniffing Electronics - Question by gollum
SIM CARD - SimTraveler - Question by gollum
Physical Bitcoin - Question by gollum
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 10:59:25