0
   

Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread III

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 12:32 pm
I suppose, this (from today's The Guardian, page 25) is a cartoon making nearly everyone grin:

http://i13.tinypic.com/2lwn2ma.jpg
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 12:38 pm
Walter, That's worth more than a grin; it's a belly-buster!
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 12:46 pm
spendius wrote:
There is Foxy.

Everybody gets a free service and the waiting list problem provides the funding for the impatient. Emergencies excepted under the provisions of the Hippocratic oath.


Well I sure hope there is a benefactor out there willing to provide that service to everybody for free. I was taught there is no such thing as a free lunch, and whether you pay for health care directly out of pocket, through a private insurance plan, or via government programs funded by very high taxes, the responsible taxpayer pays for both himself and also Citizen B who is quite happy to have everybody else provide his health care without him having to do anything for it even when he is capable of contributing to it.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 12:55 pm
Quote:
very high taxes, the responsible taxpayer pays for both himself and also Citizen B who is quite happy to have everybody else provide his health care without him having to do anything for it even when he is capable of contributing to it.


As I noted earlier, how odd it is then that those jurisdictions which have government health care do not evidence widespread or significant unhappiness with such unfair/unjust programs.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 12:58 pm
blatham, Some people just have "small" minds. They have theirs, so why should they help pay for the others? One of the reasons I'm no longer a "conservative."
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:00 pm
blatham wrote:
Quote:
very high taxes, the responsible taxpayer pays for both himself and also Citizen B who is quite happy to have everybody else provide his health care without him having to do anything for it even when he is capable of contributing to it.


As I noted earlier, how odd it is then that those jurisdictions which have government health care do not evidence widespread or significant unhappiness with such unfair/unjust programs.


Any of them have the same level of freedom, economic power, population or land mass?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:00 pm
and god damn it...everyone note this and remember it, for christ's sake...

For years now, the debate has raged: Does the press overstate the level of violence in Iraq and ignore the overall positive aspect of the U.S. involvement? The Iraq Study Group report today, in its main claim that the situation in Iraq is now "grave" and "deteriorating" would seem to offer a clue to the answer, but more specific details -- providing a "slam dunk" (if we may use that phrase) on the side of the press -- are found in the Intelligence section of the report. [...] There we learn, bluntly, that "there is significant underreporting of the violence in Iraq" by the U.S. military. "The standard for recording attacks acts as a filter to keep events out of reports and databases," the report continues. Looking at one day, the report found undercounting of violent attacks by more than 1000 percent. http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003493869
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:05 pm
blatham, Your wasting your shouting to people that refuses to acknowledge all the facts present to the rest of the world; that the sectarian violence in Iraq is beyond our control - and getting worse.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:21 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
blatham, Your wasting your shouting to people that refuses to acknowledge all the facts present to the rest of the world; that the sectarian violence in Iraq is beyond our control - and getting worse.


ci
Nah. That is something for all of us to remember. Anytime from now on when someone repeats the faith-based cliche that the media over-report violence in Iraq, point them to this reality-based report from the ISG.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:23 pm
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
Quote:
very high taxes, the responsible taxpayer pays for both himself and also Citizen B who is quite happy to have everybody else provide his health care without him having to do anything for it even when he is capable of contributing to it.


As I noted earlier, how odd it is then that those jurisdictions which have government health care do not evidence widespread or significant unhappiness with such unfair/unjust programs.


Any of them have the same level of freedom, economic power, population or land mass?


How is it you consider such factors relevant to the rhetorical question?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:27 pm
blatham wrote:
and god damn it...everyone note this and remember it, for christ's sake...

For years now, the debate has raged: Does the press overstate the level of violence in Iraq and ignore the overall positive aspect of the U.S. involvement? The Iraq Study Group report today, in its main claim that the situation in Iraq is now "grave" and "deteriorating" would seem to offer a clue to the answer, but more specific details -- providing a "slam dunk" (if we may use that phrase) on the side of the press -- are found in the Intelligence section of the report. [...] There we learn, bluntly, that "there is significant underreporting of the violence in Iraq" by the U.S. military. "The standard for recording attacks acts as a filter to keep events out of reports and databases," the report continues. Looking at one day, the report found undercounting of violent attacks by more than 1000 percent. http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003493869
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:28 pm
blatham wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
Quote:
very high taxes, the responsible taxpayer pays for both himself and also Citizen B who is quite happy to have everybody else provide his health care without him having to do anything for it even when he is capable of contributing to it.


As I noted earlier, how odd it is then that those jurisdictions which have government health care do not evidence widespread or significant unhappiness with such unfair/unjust programs.


Any of them have the same level of freedom, economic power, population or land mass?


How is it you consider such factors relevant to the rhetorical question?


Well, you suggested those places that have government health care are not unhappy and I wondered if any of those areas were similar to America.

If we are going to compare healthcare in foreign lands with healthcare in America, then we should look at the demographics and economic impacts.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:29 pm
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
Quote:
very high taxes, the responsible taxpayer pays for both himself and also Citizen B who is quite happy to have everybody else provide his health care without him having to do anything for it even when he is capable of contributing to it.


As I noted earlier, how odd it is then that those jurisdictions which have government health care do not evidence widespread or significant unhappiness with such unfair/unjust programs.


Any of them have the same level of freedom, economic power, population or land mass?


How is it you consider such factors relevant to the rhetorical question?


Well, you suggested those places that have government health care are not unhappy and I wondered if any of those areas were similar to America.

If we are going to compare healthcare in foreign lands with healthcare in America, then we should look at the demographics and economic impacts.


Canada is similar to America.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:50 pm
Canada has a land mass larger than the USA and a population of roughly 1/10th of the U.S. population. With just over three people per square kilometre (3.3 according to the 2001 Census), Canada has one of the lowest population densities in the world.

This is similar?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 01:55 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Canada has a land mass larger than the USA and a population of roughly 1/10th of the U.S. population. With just over three people per square kilometre (3.3 according to the 2001 Census), Canada has one of the lowest population densities in the world.

This is similar?


Yes, it is. They have the same freedoms we enjoy in America, their economy is proportionally similar to the US (in terms of per capita) and they enjoy both abundant natural resources and relative geographic isolation from potential problems.

OVerall Canada is not dis-similar from the US; differences in size and scope do not mean that there are not similarities between the two.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 02:08 pm
There are similarities between the US and Fiji too, but not really what I was asking for.

300 million people in the US, 33 million in Canada. $1.111 trillion GDP in Canada, $12.31 trillion GDP in the US. Not really comparable.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 02:09 pm
America is alone in advanced western nations in not having a government health scare scheme. Thus finding comparisons with the US isn't much of a stretch.

But it seems rather irrelevant in any case. If all these communities of citizens find no or little cause or reason to chuck out their medical programs, then it would seem to follow that they like them, are happy with the systems in place, and don't want to return to whatever they had before. There's no reason to assume that precisely the same thing would not happen in the US.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 02:15 pm
I wonder, do Norway and Luxemborg have nationally mandated health plans? These are the countries whose per capita income is comparable with or exceeds the USA. Canada's per capita income is about 3/4ths of the USAs per capita income.

The USA actually does provide government health care through Medicare, Medicaid, and its extensive VA and Champus programs. But USA citizens enjoy a unique freedom of being able to opt out of government programs and avail themselves of what many believe are far superior private services.

How many countries providing mandatory government healthcare programs also have good private programs available to most or all citizens?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 02:23 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
I wonder, do Norway and Luxemborg have nationally mandated health plans? These are the countries whose per capita income is comparable with or exceeds the USA. Canada's per capita income is about 3/4ths of the USAs per capita income.

The USA actually does provide government health care through Medicare, Medicaid, and its extensive VA and Champus programs. But USA citizens enjoy a unique freedom of being able to opt out of government programs and avail themselves of what many believe are far superior private services.

How many countries providing mandatory government healthcare programs also have good private programs available to most or all citizens?


McG

A big subject on which I'm not at all expert. Perhaps this would be a place to start... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalized_Medicine
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 02:24 pm
sorry, that was fox not McG...too many santa thingeys
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 10:58:35