0
   

THE BRITISH THREAD

 
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jan, 2007 10:00 pm
sarah hope things improve for you real soon.

I've been there to.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jan, 2007 11:30 pm
Okay, mates, let's just forget about my self indulgent post last night.
Thank you for your positive comments. Just pretend I never posted it. I was going to ask the mods to remove it, but I know you well enough to ask for it to be ignored... and you will oblige.

See?

That's what you get letting pesky females have access to technology!

They are just too emotional. I don't think we should have the vote!

x
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 08:33 am
Keep your pecker up, Smorgie.
Although it's not much help, we're thinking of you.

McT
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 09:43 am
I rather like impulsive ladies in their prime. Providing, of course, it is kept within sensible limits. Impulsiveness represents honesty.

smorgsie's post last night was honest. And it betrayed a powerful impulse powerfully. It requires no apology and it cannot be forgotten.

The impulse to be pampered all night in a country house hotel by a willing admirer is perfectly understandable and the moreso when it springs from within the sea of woes described so movingly. Steve had his gob open speechless and others permitted themselves a gulp.

I sometimes wish I was a lady so that I could give that sort of thing a try. It is about the only thing I would allow the idea of being a lady to cross my mind for. The other stuff doesn't look so hot to me.

A fair comparison might be a bloke crawling towards a pint of John Smith's Extra Smooth across a burning desert. And I understand that.

How would a man go about this pampering in practice.

Take it from the car-park at Jessop's Grange Mansions at mid-day in late-June with the sound of busy bees permeating the balmy air of the terrace beyond which colts are grazing near the chestnut trees whinnying from time to time and the possibilty of being watched through binoculars is not out of the question. Do's and dont's. Arty or business like? Purposeful stride across the empty concourse or a saunter down the terrace to offer the colts a bunch of grass and pick up the vibes.

It's a slow process is pampering.

I drive past shops enough to have noticed a big increase in pampering emporia.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 12:10 pm
You are all too kind...

Makes my cheeks burn to read it now. I'm okay, really, twas but a momentary lapse. I'm all smiley again now.

My girlfriends are coming over at 7p.m. They will come bearing wine, chocolate and eostrogen - the perfect combination. I will, no doubt, have an evening of raucous laughter, singing and smutty mayhem.

I have to go now to put the basmati rice on, and make chapatis. Plus, your kindness is making me all teary and it's so not a good look for me, although swollen eyelids make the perfect pallete for the application of jet-black eyeliner a la Dusty.

Affectionately yours

smorgs
x

P.S. Who'd of thought you could be so supportive and understanding - and you don't even have breasts - though I suspect there's a few sets of moobs on this thread...

My anthem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAV3XG673Rk
0 Replies
 
Dutchy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 01:19 pm
Good to see you smile smorgs, have a great night with the girls, and tell all of us some bawdy jokes you'll undoubtedly hear tonight.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 03:58 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENCa43r9jmY&mode=related&search=

Smorgie's quotes from youTube reminded me of an article in the paper this week, when an English academic on a conference in Atlanta was set upon by the local busies, for jaywalking.

He is shown filmed on this clip (there are three parts) after his release from jail.

If you stick with this interview, it is rewarding. I think LE will like it.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 04:29 pm
Thanks for that, McT.

What a nice guy he is, and how very British!

---------------------------------------------------------------

Sarah, I hope you have/had a great time tonight with the girls.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 04:33 pm
Mac-

"Busies" are detectives. It is completely beneath the dignity of a detective to even notice such things as jaywalking or anything else that doesn't call for specialised detective expertise.

I don't think it is a word used in America. You must have picked it on the borderlines of minor criminality such as drinking after time.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 05:36 pm
McTag wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENCa43r9jmY&mode=related&search=

Smorgie's quotes from youTube reminded me of an article in the paper this week, when an English academic on a conference in Atlanta was set upon by the local busies, for jaywalking.

He is shown filmed on this clip (there are three parts) after his release from jail.

If you stick with this interview, it is rewarding. I think LE will like it.


Neal Boortz on the English academic's article in the Atlanta newspaper:

Quote:
MY GOD! THE ARROGANCE!

Yesterday I opened my show -- a portion of my show that most of you don't hear -- with a bit of a rant about a story in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. It seems that a British historian was arrested for jaywalking in Atlanta. To make matters worse, he wasn't detained and "taken down," as it were, by a uniformed Atlanta police officer, but by an off-duty cop who was working as a security guard at a nearby hotel. At first my sympathies were with the Brit. After all, it's hard to forget the Atlanta woman who was body-slammed by a cop at the airport a few years ago. Now, after reading this column written by the historian, I'm ready to buy that cop/security guard some lunch.

The professor has this to say about our his experience as it relates to our country and our president:

"I have long known, as any reasonable person must, that the courts are the citizen's only protection against a rogue executive and rationally uncontrolled security forces. Though my own misadventure was trivial - and in perspective laughable - it resembles what is happening to the world in the era of George W. Bush. The planet is policed by a violent, arbitrary, stupid and dangerous force. Within the USA, the courts struggle to maintain individual rights under the bludgeons of the "war on terror," defending Guantanamo victims and striving to curb the excesses of the system. We need global institutions of justice, and judges of Judge Jackson's level of humanity and wisdom, to help protect the world."

So .. there you are. "The planet is policed by a violent, arbitrary, stupid and dangerous force." And what would that force be? Why, the United States, of course! No mention of the threat of Islamic fascism. No mention of the violent, arbitrary and dangerous nature of flying airplanes into office buildings. In fact, Professor Frail puts scare quotes around his reference to the war on terror, so as to say that he doesn't really believe that there is any terrorism to be fought! Then he goes on to say that what we really need is some sort of an international court to protect the world from the United States.

Some historian. Perhaps he doesn't remember the role of the United States in saving his precious Europe from Hitler and Soviet expansionism.

Now none of Professor Historian's arrogance and seeming hatred of the United States .. and most certainly of George Bush .. would be a sufficient excuse for an Atlanta cop to throw him to the ground and arrest him for jaywalking; but you are left wondering just what this man said to the cop to provoke such an action. I think that we all know that a simple "I'm sorry, officer, I'll be more careful the next time" would have been more than sufficient. Clearly it escalated beyond that. Is it possible that the good professor used some of his "George Bush is Stupid, America is violent, dangerous and arbitrary" nonsense on the cop?

Yesterday I had to chose sides .. between a member of European academia and an Atlanta Cop. I chose the wrong side. For that I apologize. I should have known better.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 06:10 pm
Tico-

You are saying that the best policy is to show due deference to the uniform and you also put words into the man's mouth and might just as well have said "hey mister-I don't need your f******g help to get to the other side of the f****g street.

Now I am the first man to show due deference to a uniform but not when it's worn by a f*****g traffic warden.

A uniform signifies a wiilingness to put the wearer's life at risk however remotely and I am totally against them for barmaids for very obvious reasons.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 06:59 pm
spendius wrote:
Tico-

You are saying ...


Careful ... I've said nothing.

Quote:
... that the best policy is to show due deference to the uniform ...


That's a true statement, but of course the cop was not wearing a uniform in this particular instance.

Quote:
... and you also put words into the man's mouth ...


No, I didn't.

Quote:
...and might just as well have said "hey mister-I don't need your f******g help to get to the other side of the f****g street.


"We" don't know what the man said, and "we" might have been sympathetic to his travails ... but then he opened his mouth (figuratively speaking) and penned his thoughts in a missive to the metropolitan newspaper. With an attitude such as he displayed there, one's can imagine any number of things he might have said that prompted the response he received from the cop. I do not think he was being respectful, that's for certain.

Quote:
Now I am the first man to show due deference to a uniform but not when it's worn by a f*****g traffic warden.


Not a "traffic warden" in this instance, but I suppose if you choose to disrespect a uniformed law enforcement officer, you ought to have a good understanding your experience is not likely going to be a positive one.

Quote:
A uniform signifies a wiilingness to put the wearer's life at risk however remotely and I am totally against them for barmaids for very obvious reasons.


Really? You think a uniform signifies a willingness to put one's life at risk? You think that applies to ALL uniforms? Parking ticket "ambassadors"? Road crew? Meter readers? Postal employees?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 07:09 pm
Tico wrote-

Quote:
Really? You think a uniform signifies a willingness to put one's life at risk? You think that applies to ALL uniforms? Parking ticket "ambassadors"? Road crew? Meter readers? Postal employees?


I meant that is what a uniform ought to signify. I was in the way of complaining about what it does now signify in our f****d up world.

I'm surprised you disagree Tico. I thought you were on the right.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 07:16 pm
Quote:
I thought you were on the right.


Yep .... I'm usually right.
0 Replies
 
Dutchy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 02:21 am
Good Morning all you English Cricket lovers, thought you might like to read the latest news from 'Downunder'.

Australia belt NZ at one day int'l
Sunday January 14, 5:50 PM

New opponent, same result.

After battering England into submission the past two months, Australia on Sunday wasted little time asserting its authority over New Zealand in the one-day international tri-series by belting the Black Caps by 105 runs in Hobart.

Not even a Shane Bond hat-trick and superb half-century from Ross Taylor was enough to spoil Australia's perfect summer as Adam Gilchrist, man-of-the-match Andrew Symonds and Cameron White thrilled a packed Bellerive Oval with a brutal display of power hitting.

Bond (4-61) added further to his remarkable record against the world champions by taking New Zealand's second ODI hat-trick in the final over of Australia's innings.

But it proved too much too late for the tourists after Symonds (69 from 70 balls) and White (45 from 31) had already inflicted significant damage with 90 runs off 54 balls to rocket Australia to 8-289 from its 50 overs.

The Black Caps were bowled out for 184 in reply after the dismissal of Taylor (84 from 82 balls) sparked a massive collapse, the tourists losing their last seven wickets for just 23 runs.

The result maintained Australia's unbeaten streak this summer having previously tormented England with a 5-0 Ashes whitewash and emphatic wins in both the one-off Twenty20 game and opening tri-series clash on Friday.

Adam Gilchrist belted 61 from 57 balls in an 82-run opening stand with Matthew Hayden (27) as Australia got off to the perfect start in what will be the first of at least seven trans-Tasman meetings in the lead-up to the World Cup in March.

Mitchell Johnson (2-27), Stuart Clark (2-40) and Symonds (2-41) each took two wickets in an attack missing a rested Glenn McGrath and Brett Lee (chest infection).

Tasmanian swing bowler Ben Hilfenhaus was handed the new ball by skipper Ricky Ponting in his debut one-day international, and with backing of a parochial 16,590-strong crowd delivered the perfect response by trapping New Zealand opener Brendon McCullum (5) leg-before with just his 12th ball.

It left New Zealand 2-7 in the fourth over.

Stephen Fleming (29) and Taylor - playing just his eighth ODI and first against Australia - added 73 for the third wicket before Taylor and Peter Fulton (37) combined for 81 runs in 69 balls to have the visitors well in the hunt.

But when Taylor fell to Johnson with the score at 161 it was the beginning of the end for the visitors.

Earlier, White smacked three sixes in a superb late-innings cameo, bashing Vettori over the mid-wicket fence off consecutive balls and then dispatching Bond onto the roof of the Members' Stand.

He was eventually caught on the boundary to Bond to kick off the quick's hat-trick run. Bond then had Symonds caught behind before completing the hat-trick by bowling Nathan Bracken.

Bond has now taken 28 wickets in eight games against Australia at an average of 12.36. He was the 23rd player to take a hat-trick in ODI cricket and second behind Danny Morrison for New Zealand.

Australia has now won 17 of the last 19 ODI games against its trans-Tasman rival.

New Zealand plays England on Tuesday in Hobart with Australia travelling to Brisbane for its next match against England on Friday.
0 Replies
 
kitchenpete
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 03:13 am
Ticomaya wrote:
McTag wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENCa43r9jmY&mode=related&search=

Smorgie's quotes from youTube reminded me of an article in the paper this week, when an English academic on a conference in Atlanta was set upon by the local busies, for jaywalking.

He is shown filmed on this clip (there are three parts) after his release from jail.

If you stick with this interview, it is rewarding. I think LE will like it.


Neal Boortz on the English academic's article in the Atlanta newspaper:

Quote:
MY GOD! THE ARROGANCE!

Yesterday I opened my show -- a portion of my show that most of you don't hear -- with a bit of a rant about a story in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. It seems that a British historian was arrested for jaywalking in Atlanta. To make matters worse, he wasn't detained and "taken down," as it were, by a uniformed Atlanta police officer, but by an off-duty cop who was working as a security guard at a nearby hotel. At first my sympathies were with the Brit. After all, it's hard to forget the Atlanta woman who was body-slammed by a cop at the airport a few years ago. Now, after reading this column written by the historian, I'm ready to buy that cop/security guard some lunch.

The professor has this to say about our his experience as it relates to our country and our president:

"I have long known, as any reasonable person must, that the courts are the citizen's only protection against a rogue executive and rationally uncontrolled security forces. Though my own misadventure was trivial - and in perspective laughable - it resembles what is happening to the world in the era of George W. Bush. The planet is policed by a violent, arbitrary, stupid and dangerous force. Within the USA, the courts struggle to maintain individual rights under the bludgeons of the "war on terror," defending Guantanamo victims and striving to curb the excesses of the system. We need global institutions of justice, and judges of Judge Jackson's level of humanity and wisdom, to help protect the world."

So .. there you are. "The planet is policed by a violent, arbitrary, stupid and dangerous force." And what would that force be? Why, the United States, of course! No mention of the threat of Islamic fascism. No mention of the violent, arbitrary and dangerous nature of flying airplanes into office buildings. In fact, Professor Frail puts scare quotes around his reference to the war on terror, so as to say that he doesn't really believe that there is any terrorism to be fought! Then he goes on to say that what we really need is some sort of an international court to protect the world from the United States.

Some historian. Perhaps he doesn't remember the role of the United States in saving his precious Europe from Hitler and Soviet expansionism.

Now none of Professor Historian's arrogance and seeming hatred of the United States .. and most certainly of George Bush .. would be a sufficient excuse for an Atlanta cop to throw him to the ground and arrest him for jaywalking; but you are left wondering just what this man said to the cop to provoke such an action. I think that we all know that a simple "I'm sorry, officer, I'll be more careful the next time" would have been more than sufficient. Clearly it escalated beyond that. Is it possible that the good professor used some of his "George Bush is Stupid, America is violent, dangerous and arbitrary" nonsense on the cop?

Yesterday I had to chose sides .. between a member of European academia and an Atlanta Cop. I chose the wrong side. For that I apologize. I should have known better.


Tico

I understand that criticism of the USA can raise patriotic hackles but many, probably MOST, Europeans resent the apparent attitude of those who hold the single world view expressed above.

Such an attitude seems to assume without questions the validity of a "war on terror" (my choice to use quotation marks) and the justification of any breach of the normal, fair, application of law by reference to 9/11, not to mention references to "saving" Europe from all the travails of the 20th century.

By and large, I like US citizens and most of the principles on which the USA operates are familiar and acceptable to me but there is a view, as expressed above, which is unquestioning of propaganda (of the last 50 years, let alone the last 5) and puts "flag" about intelligent discourse.

Never mind if the academic insulted the USA - that's no reason to arrest him, is it? What happened to free speech?

KP
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 03:29 am
Hey guys, I only put up that clip because it was funny. And the guy had a funny English accent. And the situation was ludicrous.

Astonishing, though, that Tico's paper should suggest he should have borne in mind America's late intervention in WWII as the law officer knelt on his neck and handcuffed him.

Gratifying, the professor's admiration of the way Justice Jackson dealt with the matter when eventually it came before him. There is still goodwill and commonsense in America, evidently, despite Tico.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 03:49 am
Funny accent? You mean you don't all sound like that? Right ... I think he was arrested for the accent alone.

I think what you may have missed in your quick skim of the article I posted, was that Boortz was initially sympathetic to his plight, but that changed after the guy felt the need to write-up the event for an article in the Atlanta newspaper the next day (LINK), wherein he expressed his anti-American views, and his belief that there needs to be a "global institution of justice" to protect the world from the US.

What an a$$.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 04:00 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Funny accent? You mean you don't all sound like that? Right ... I think he was arrested for the accent alone.

I think what you may have missed in your quick skim of the article I posted, was that Boortz was initially sympathetic to his plight, but that changed after the guy felt the need to write-up the event for an article in the Atlanta newspaper the next day (LINK), wherein he expressed his anti-American views, and his belief that there needs to be a "global institution of justice" to protect the world from the US.

What an a$$.


Unwise and ungrateful, and impolite, that anyone invited to a conference should criticise the host nation.

Although I've got the feeling he is not anti-American, simply against some recent excesses.

By the way, I'm listening to this broadcast again on BBC R4 as I write. Cause celebre on a slow-news day.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 06:48 am
Morning everyone!

I made:

Chicken Korma
Sweet potato and cauliflower balti (for the faddy veggies)
Basmati rice (Pillau)
Chapatis
Salad
Naan (but I burnt them)
Ice cream
After eights ('cos we is classy chicks)

Drank:
2 Bottles of Moet
2 bottles of Hardys Crest Pinot Noir Chardonnay
1 bottle of Amarula (which was delicious - first time I tasted it)
1 bottle of Bacardi
2 large bottles diet coke
I took photos - but they are un-printable here.

Sang and laughed so much, my voice is all husky this morning.

x
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE BRITISH THREAD
  3. » Page 202
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/19/2025 at 11:30:15