1
   

How Americans would vote in reruns of previous presidentials

 
 
nimh
 
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 10:49 am
Source: Angus Reid Scan

I added the actual results and comparisons, and beautified it into the table below.

http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/52/pollpresidentialelectionsretrospectcf0.gif
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,988 • Replies: 25
No top replies

 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 10:51 am
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 10:54 am
Re: How Americans would vote in reruns of previous president
nimh wrote:
Source: Angus Reid Scan

Here's the link
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 10:54 am
The outcome looks pretty ugly to me.... Wink
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 10:56 am
From '76 on, all winners get a bonus in their winning margin (history doesnt look kindly on losers) -- except for GWB.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 10:57 am
DrewDad wrote:
The outcome looks pretty ugly to me.... Wink

Content-wise or design-wise?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 11:31 am
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 12:06 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.

How soon we forget Connecticut.

I'd stop drinking if I were you.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 01:00 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.

How soon we forget Connecticut.

I'd stop drinking if I were you.

Some Republican was defeated recently in Connecticut?
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 01:06 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.

How soon we forget Connecticut.

I'd stop drinking if I were you.

Some Republican was defeated recently in Connecticut?

No, Einstein, the anti-war, anti-incumbent, anti-Washington and anti-Republican war mongering voters won.

But you know, Joe might as well be a Republican. Why else is he now garnering the support of Republicans across the country, including the likes of Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, and the rest of those wingnut windbags?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 01:09 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.

How soon we forget Connecticut.

I'd stop drinking if I were you.

Some Republican was defeated recently in Connecticut?

No, Einstein, the anti-war, anti-incumbent, anti-Washington and anti-Republican war mongering voters won.

But you know, Joe might as well be a Republican. Why else is he now garnering the support of Republicans across the country, including the likes of Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, and the rest of those wingnut windbags?

Like I said, when you win an election, get back to me.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 01:11 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.

How soon we forget Connecticut.

I'd stop drinking if I were you.

Some Republican was defeated recently in Connecticut?

No, Einstein, the anti-war, anti-incumbent, anti-Washington and anti-Republican war mongering voters won.

But you know, Joe might as well be a Republican. Why else is he now garnering the support of Republicans across the country, including the likes of Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, and the rest of those wingnut windbags?

Like I said, when you win an election, get back to me.

When you learn what a primary is and what's at stake, perhaps I will. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 01:13 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.

How soon we forget Connecticut.

I'd stop drinking if I were you.

Some Republican was defeated recently in Connecticut?

No, Einstein, the anti-war, anti-incumbent, anti-Washington and anti-Republican war mongering voters won.

But you know, Joe might as well be a Republican. Why else is he now garnering the support of Republicans across the country, including the likes of Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, and the rest of those wingnut windbags?

Like I said, when you win an election, get back to me.

When you learn what a primary is and what's at stake, perhaps I will. :wink:

I'll reduce to baby talk what was blindingly obvious to begin with. When one of your candidates is elected to office, get back to me.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 03:53 pm
Yeah it is interesting material, isnt it, this poll...?

What I forgot to do was to add the title/subject of the poll in regular text, so Google might pick up on this thread:

Poll: How Americans would vote in a rerun of previous presidential elections
Source: Scripps Howard News Service / Ohio University, July 6 - 24, 2006

The table in the opening post of this thread adds the actual historical election results for comparison with what the poll shows people would vote in retrospect, and details the change between them and the change in the margin between the two main candidates.

Anyone want to comment? Observations, personal reactions?
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 03:56 pm
Did they only poll people who were allowed to vote in the original election?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 03:59 pm
DrewDad wrote:
Did they only poll people who were allowed to vote in the original election?

Good question.

No, at Angus Reid where they posted the poll it only says, re methodology, "Telephone interviews with 1,010 American adults".

See if I can find more.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 04:02 pm
Well, even though those polled were asked about past elections, what we get with this poll is a snapshot of the current situation (obvioulsy). It would be intesting to compare similar data during the presidency of previous presidents... For example, during the Lewinsky scandal, was there a similar reaction observable, and just the historical distance casts a more favorable light on the presidency of Clinton?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 04:05 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
I guess that explains Bush Jr.'s whopping 35% approval rating. But this comes as no surprise.

The tide is turning...

Perhaps you should talk after you actually win something.

How soon we forget Connecticut.

I'd stop drinking if I were you.

Some Republican was defeated recently in Connecticut?


yup, Joe Leiberman....
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 04:36 pm
nimh wrote:
DrewDad wrote:
Did they only poll people who were allowed to vote in the original election?

Good question.

No, at Angus Reid where they posted the poll it only says, re methodology, "Telephone interviews with 1,010 American adults".

See if I can find more.

Nope. The website of the Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University has a page about the survey that the questions about past elections were part of, which has the questions and the number of respondents for each but not much else. It has links promising the SPSS files of the survey data, but they dont work.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Aug, 2006 04:41 pm
I definitely would vote for Martin van Buren this time around.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How Americans would vote in reruns of previous presidentials
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 06:17:10