Lightwizard wrote:Better read the article before spouting off --
not spouting off at all lightwizard, and you seem to have some misplaced anger for me...
as I said, this wasn't directed at gibsons acts or alcoholism...just stating a fact that a person does not have to be drinking and drinking drunk numerous times before getting a DUI....
This was more of a mini-hijack of this thread for a moment away from gibson, and toward the idea that it is entirely possible to get a DUI without ever having drunk before that occassion.
Of Course gibson has a history of alcoholism, and of Course he has driven under the influence before that.
I wasn't "spouting" off them, and I'm not "spouting" off now. Nor have I or am I presently calling you ridculous.
It's not the law of averages in this case, it's the law of probability. gibson aside, I was merely stating a fact.
Now....on with the show.....