Paul was a liar just as the false apostles were, and he was rejected at Ephesus like they were rejected.
Paul who was falsely accused of taking Gentiles into the Temple, by hate filled false accusers like yourself, never lied.
If he had ‘NOT
’ been a follower of ‘THE WAY
’ and the new covenant of Jesus, and had instead remained true to the teachings of Moses and the old covenant, and had not taught that Jesus had been risen from the dead, he would never have been dragged before the council.
For two years the Apostle Paul, preached the way of the Lord in the lands along the north-eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, which included Ephesus, which resulted in the explosive growth of Christianity in that area, which took place around 53-54 AD.
Anyone who has read Acts 19: 11-20, and still believes that Paul, the holy apostle of the Lord, was one of the false apostles that were spoken of in Revelation 2: 2; Has rocks in it’s head, and is an ignorant and mentally unstable person, as Peter said of those who twist Paul’s teachings to their own destruction. See 2 Peter 3: 16.
Acts 19: 17; All the Jews and Gentiles who lived in Ephesus heard about this; they were all filled with fear, and the name of the Lord Jesus was given greater honour.
I wonder if those 40 Paul haters, who took a solemn vow to not eat or drink until they had put an end to Paul and his teachings, died as they rightfully should have, or whether they broke their solemn vow, when they came to realise that Paul, the Holy Apostle of Jesus, was under God’s protection?
Ezekiel 3: 18-19; If I announce that an evil person is going to die but you do not warn him to change his ways so that he can save his life, he will die, still a sinner, and I will hold you responsible for his death. If you do warn an evil man and he doesn't stop sinning, he will die, still a sinner, but your life will be spared.