Thomas wrote:Dookiestix wrote:Oh well, so much for the will of the people. It is now the will of the minority, diehard religious zealot who seems to be making Bush's decisions for him.
No. The majority that elected Bush for president prevailed over the majorities that elected each member into Congress. Both institutions, Congress and the presidency, are elected by popular vote, and thus represent a majority of voters.
Wrong. If the popular vote counted, Al Gore would have been our 43rd President. Bush won by getting more electoral votes in 2000 and 2004, and it has been well documented (but barely publicized) that both the 2000 and 2004 elections were the most fraudulent, giving Republicans the most advantage over Democrats in every sense of the word. But to be clear; Bush did NOT get the popular vote in 2000.
The will of the people NOW has nothing to do with who they elected, but the policies they wish to see instilled NOW. As there are plenty of conservatives who also support embryonic stem cell research, then it would lead one to conclude that they are not very happy with Bush at this point in time. In layman's terms, this is what we call "buyers' remorse," and it's getting worse for the diehard conservative who now sees Bush as not doing what he had promised them he would do. Besides, Bush's popularity amongst his own conservative supporters now is dramatically different than it was just prior to the 2004 elections. That's because there was a lot we didn't know then that we know now.
Not so cut and dry, is it?