15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jun, 2010 06:41 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:


...It seems to me that the really significant new fact emerging from this event is the Islamization of the Turkish government and its fundamental shift away from Europe and towards leadership of its former empire. The days of the political alliance between the then secular government of Turkey and Israel are over.



Not that I am correct, but the fact that Turkey seems to be reestablishing its Islamic identity, after almost a century of being almost European, might be due to its acceptance that the EU members may just not want to think of Turkey as European? I thought Germany had/has strong antipathy to Turkey joining the EU? Didn't Turkey and Germany fight on the same side in WWI? Some friendships can be so fleeting, it seems to me. Perhaps, Germany does not need/want Turkey as an ally at this point in history, since Germany is doing much better as a democratic, capitalist nation?

My question is whether Turkey would become the seat of any Caliphate in the future. Could there be another motive for Turkey to rediscover its Islamic roots? Balance the power aspirations of Iran?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jun, 2010 07:04 pm
@Advocate,
If this tired one sided charge is the cause of the problems that exist to this day, then it's highly pertinent, Advocate. Israel refuses to abide by many many UN resolutions.

If you compare Israel and Iraq, the US should have long ago invaded Israel and deposed their government, had some quick mock trials to hide their complicity in various nefarious deeds and hung the lot.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Mon 7 Jun, 2010 07:52 pm
@old europe,
There is a long history of the Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews killing each other. I posted an abbreviation of that history several times. Neither group is more innocent than the other, and neither group is more guilty than the other. When one group tries to murder members of the other group, they are guilty. When the other group attempts to defend itself against the murdering group they are more innocent than guilty.

It is an inescapable fact that currently the primary objective of the Palestinian Arabs is to exterminate the Palestinian Jews in Israel. So the Palestinian Jews are defending themselves in whatever way they think will work.

Neither the Palestinian Arabs nor the Palestinian Jews possess any historic right to their current territory. What they posses, they obtained from the British plus their own successful and unsuccessful, good and bad efforts.

One solution recently advocated is to remove the Palestinian Jews from Palestine and relocate them in Europe. That solution is no more justifiable than to remove the Palestinian Arabs from Palestine and relocte them in Arabia.

The solution is obvious. The Israelis must give up the Palestinian land they conquered after they declared their independence, and the Palestinian Arabs must simultaneously give up their efforts to exterminate the Israelis. Not until both happen at the same time will this obvious solution be adopted.
old europe
 
  2  
Reply Mon 7 Jun, 2010 08:23 pm
@ican711nm,
Nothing of what you wrote has anything to do with the recent Israeli flotilla raid. Not one single person of all the people who were killed was a "Palestinian Arab". No evidence whatsoever has been presented that would indicate that the intention of those killed civilians was to "exterminate the Palestinian Jews in Israel."

You justified the killing of those people by saying that Israel was prejudiced against them. How does prejudice against anyone give you the right to kill that person?
georgeob1
 
  2  
Reply Mon 7 Jun, 2010 08:27 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

Neither the Palestinian Arabs nor the Palestinian Jews possess any historic right to their current territory. What they posses, they obtained from the British plus their own successful and unsuccessful, good and bad efforts.


An amazingly nonsensical statement. There have been many occupants and occupiers of the territory of Palestine over the last two thousand years. However, none of them had less legitamacy than the British colonial occupiers who held the land from the end of WWI until 1947. Their historical, political and moral right to confer it on anyone was nil.

It is an undisputed historical fact that Moslem, Christian, Druz, and Jewish Palestinians occupied the land long before the European Jewish Zionist movement began in the late 19th century.
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 09:29 am
Let's be real! When the survivors of the Final Solution were "dumped" into the British Mandate of Palestine, and the British solicited the UN to have it made a Jewish state, can anyone say with a straight face that no one knew there was going to be hostility towards the Jewish state? The Arabs in Palestine were rioting against the Zionist Jews back in the 1920's.

So, as far as I am concerned, the Zionist Jews were sold the proverbial pig in a poke. The British knew it was going to be a short lived peace for these survivors of the Final Solution, in my opinion.

However, since the history of the world is where different peoples took over the same piece of land, right now I do not see the Zionist Jews in Israel going back to Europe, or anywhere else, since collectively, I believe, Zionist Jews have had their fill of living amongst nice Gentiles.
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 10:20 am
I keep reading condemnations of Israel's alleged blockade of Gaza. It is a stretch to call it a blockade considering that, were the nonmilitary goods shipped through Israel, they would not be stopped.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 10:51 am
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:

Let's be real! When the survivors of the Final Solution were "dumped" into the British Mandate of Palestine, and the British solicited the UN to have it made a Jewish state,....


Some serious distortions of historical fact there.

The survivors of the Holocaust were not "dumped" by anyone into British-controlled Palestine. They fled there in large numbers in a movement planned organized and funded by largely Jewish Zionist organizations. Their motives in going were certainly understandable - the Holocaust, and the fact that many weren't welcome back in their former homes by Europeans, induced a generation off European jews who had previously rejected Zionist inducements voted en masse with their feet in 1946.

The British were in 1945 suddently confronted with their duplicity before and during WWI when they promised the land of Palestine (which they really intended to keep after they got it from the Turkish Ottomans) both to the Hashemite Arab then rulers of Mecca and Medina and to the European Zionist leaders. The British with their traditional duplicity played both sides of the game, working hard to convince both parties that they were on their side, up until the end when they suddenly announced they were bugging out and asked the UN to take over the mess they had created.
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 12:23 pm
@georgeob1,
ican:
Quote:
Neither the Palestinian Arabs nor the Palestinian Jews possess any historic right to their current territory. What they posses, they obtained from the British plus their own successful and unsuccessful, good and bad efforts.

georgeob1:
Quote:
An amazingly nonsensical statement. There have been many occupants and occupiers of the territory of Palestine over the last two thousand years. However, none of them had less legitamacy than the British colonial occupiers who held the land from the end of WWI until 1947. Their historical, political and moral right to confer it on anyone was nil.

The British did not confer Palestine to anyone. They asked the UN to resolve the conflict and subsequently pulled out of Palestine leaving it to the Arabs and Jews to decide whether or not to implement the 1947 UN resolution. It was that UN resolution that in 1947 recommended a division of Palestine into an Arab state and a Jewish state. The British just pulled out of Palestine leaving it to the Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews to decide how to govern Palestine.

The Palestinian Jews decided to implement that part of the UN recommendation that applied to them. They declared Israel their independent state in 1948 .

The Palestinian Arabs decided to reject the entire UN recommendation. They declared all of Palestine their independent state in 1948.

georgeob1"
Quote:
It is an undisputed historical fact that Moslem, Christian, Druz, and Jewish Palestinians occupied the land long before the European Jewish Zionist movement began in the late 19th century.

Yes! All these people "occupied the land long before the European Jewish Zionist movement began in the late 19th century. Also, at one time or another, so did Hebrews (early Jews), Egyptians, Greeks, Turks, Europeans, et cetera. The point is that in 1947 no particular group of people possessed a valid prior claim to Palestine or any part of it.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 12:42 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:
Nothing of what you wrote has anything to do with the recent Israeli flotilla raid. Not one single person of all the people who were killed was a "Palestinian Arab". No evidence whatsoever has been presented that would indicate that the intention of those killed civilians was to "exterminate the Palestinian Jews in Israel."

You justified the killing of those people by saying that Israel was prejudiced against them. How does prejudice against anyone give you the right to kill that person?

WRONG! What I wrote has a great deal "to do with the recent Israeli flotilla raid." Those killed by the Israeli attempt to inspect that ship were allies of the Palestinian Arabs. On the contrary, many if not all the people on that boat were acting in support of the Palestinian terrorists.

I did not justify "killing of those people by saying that Israel was prejudiced against them.." I justified killing of those people by saying that Israel military soldiers that killed those people were acting in their own self-defense.
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 12:54 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:
Those killed by the Israeli attempt to inspect that ship were allies of the Palestinian Arabs. On the contrary, many if not all the people on that boat were acting in support of the Palestinian terrorists.

An interesting argument. So are the United States acting in support of the Palestinian terrorists by providing humanitarian aid to Gaza? Do I get to call you a terrorism supporter?
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 01:21 pm
@Advocate,
Quote:
I guess you feel that our actions at Midway, when we sunk most of the Japanese navy, was illegal. Midway is in the middle of the Pacific


First off, Midway was and still is an American territory, therefore defending it was perfectly valid.

We sunk 4 Japanese carriers and a Japanese cruiser at the battle of Midway.
That was no where near "most of the Japanese Navy at the time.
What we did was seriously deplete their pool of experienced pilots, and most of their carrier ability.
The Japanese Navy still remained a potent fighting force after that battle.

If you are going to use history as an example, make sure you get it right.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 01:36 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

Those killed by the Israeli attempt to inspect that ship were allies of the Palestinian Arabs. On the contrary, many if not all the people on that boat were acting in support of the Palestinian terrorists.


Our parishes, as well as some more from all over Europe, have send some support for the only children hospital (run by Caritas) in Palestine and the occupied Gaza strip. (Faten Mukarker, a Palestine Christian 8[born in Germany] reports about this situation just now in parishes here.).

Well, Christians, especially Catholics, and Palestine Christians/Catholics in particular are terrorists qua definitione, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 04:43 pm
@old europe,
Old Europe, cut the bunk!

No American started beating with pipes and poles the Israeli soldiers who landed on that boat to inspect the boat for ordnance. Those beaters were acting in support of Palestinian terrorists to try and prevent that inspection.

No one was or is trying to prevent humanitarian aid to Gaza.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jun, 2010 06:53 pm
@mysteryman,
Quote:
We sunk 4 ... What we did ...


'we' ... , 'we' ... .

Do you count yourself in for the war crimes, the terrorist actions, the mass murders too? Are you part of the 'we' then, MM?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jun, 2010 05:49 am
Quote:
Were they peaceful activists or supporters of terrorism? Israel claims that some participants and organizers of the Gaza aid convoy attacked by the Israeli navy on May 31 had links with terrorist groups -- but they have offered no evidence. SPIEGEL ONLINE takes a closer look at the accusations.
A Closer Look at Israel's Terror Accusations
Quote:

[...]
Initially the accusations focused on the Turkish aid organization IHH which had purchased three of the six ships in the convoy. Most of the nine Turkish activists killed in the raid appear to have been IHH members. But Israel has since then also accused five individuals who appear to have no connection with IHH of having links with al-Qaida, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad group.
The accusations are almost impossible to verify because the Israeli government appears to be basing them on secret intelligence information, if indeed there is a foundation for their claims. In a statement released on Monday, the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) released a list of five passengers on board the Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara that the army claimed were "known to be involved in terrorist activity." ...

The list lacks any references to sources. "The following passengers on board the Mavi Marmara are known to be involved in terrorist activity," the statement says at the beginning. The Israeli army provides no evidence to back up its claims. ...

0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Jun, 2010 09:41 am
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Foofie wrote:

Let's be real! When the survivors of the Final Solution were "dumped" into the British Mandate of Palestine, and the British solicited the UN to have it made a Jewish state,....


Some serious distortions of historical fact there.

The survivors of the Holocaust were not "dumped" by anyone into British-controlled Palestine. They fled there in large numbers in a movement planned organized and funded by largely Jewish Zionist organizations. Their motives in going were certainly understandable - the Holocaust, and the fact that many weren't welcome back in their former homes by Europeans, induced a generation off European jews who had previously rejected Zionist inducements voted en masse with their feet in 1946.

The British were in 1945 suddently confronted with their duplicity before and during WWI when they promised the land of Palestine (which they really intended to keep after they got it from the Turkish Ottomans) both to the Hashemite Arab then rulers of Mecca and Medina and to the European Zionist leaders. The British with their traditional duplicity played both sides of the game, working hard to convince both parties that they were on their side, up until the end when they suddenly announced they were bugging out and asked the UN to take over the mess they had created.


In the way of analogy, when the British were exporting food out of Ireland, during the nineteenth century potato famine, the Irish were in effect "dumped" into the U.S., since the U.S. was an English speaking country that could take them (with some hope of surviving). Similarly, with the British not pleading for the survivors of the Final Solution to settle in Britain, the Jews too in effect were dumped into the Holy Land, in my opinion. The word "dumped," I believe can have nuances for purposes of euphemistically referring to machinations that resulted in London being rid of the non-English speaking Jewish foreigners.

Discussing Israel with many a non-Jew, or many a non evangelical Christian, is really talking at cross-purposes in many instances, in my opinion, since Israel connotes something other than just a piece of land. Sort of like when Dennis Day sang O Danny Boy on the Jack Benny Show. Many an Irishman got misty eyed in front of the t.v., while many a non-Irishman just wanted to continue with the comedy of Jack Benny and company.

0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jun, 2010 07:12 am
This is getting interesting.

Fox News just reported that Saudi Arabia has given permission for Israeli jets to use Saudi airspace if they attack Iran.

Will post a link as soon as I get one.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jun, 2010 07:34 am
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

Fox News just reported that Saudi Arabia has given permission for Israeli jets to use Saudi airspace if they attack Iran.


Actually, that has been reported by timesonline already yesterday and is printed in today's Times. (No link due to legel/subscription rules).

Here's the Foxnews' Times re-print
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jun, 2010 08:19 am
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

This is getting interesting.


What's getting interesting is, in my opinion, how this new diplomatic dispute will be resolved:

Polish authorities have arrested an alleged Mossad agent wanted in connection with the killing of a Hamas leader in Dubai, the German federal prosecutor's office said today.
Germany is now seeking "Uri Brodsky"'s (holding an Israelian passport) extradition.
The spokesman said Brodsky is suspected of working for a foreign spy agency in Germany and helping issue a fake German passport to a member of the Mossad hit squad that was allegedly behind the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in January.
He said Brodsky was arrested in early June upon his arrival in Poland because of a European arrest warrant issued by Germany.
Israel already warned the Polish authorities about consequences if they extracted "Brodsky" to Germany. (Source: AP, Spiegel)

Report in English: Alleged Mossad agent held in Poland over Dubai murder
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 02:50:29