15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:49 pm
Quote:
Agreed, so isn't it wondeful that Israel doesn't do that? Hamas does, but Israel doesn't.


Are you sure you want to stick with that? Israel does not send missles into civilian areas in order to get rockets or Hamas or Hezbala (spell?) fighters who/which are in civilian areas?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:52 pm
revel wrote:
Quote:
Agreed, so isn't it wondeful that Israel doesn't do that? Hamas does, but Israel doesn't.


Are you sure you want to stick with that? Israel does not send missles into civilian areas in order to get rockets or Hamas or Hezbala (spell?) fighters?


Thank you Revel. You are actually slowly but surely maybe catching on. Israel sends rockets into Israel hoping to take out the people and weapons that are being fired at Israeli civilians. Good for you. I knew you had it in you.

I even bet you think it is okay for the police to shoot at that gunman in the school or crowded restaurant too in order to stop the killing even if it is possible that an innocent might be unintentionally hurt. Or should they shoot only if they are certain they can hit the gun in his hand?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 03:59 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
I even bet you think it is okay for the police to shoot at that gunman in the school or crowded restaurant too in order to stop the killing even if it is possible that an innocent might be unintentionally hurt. Or should they shoot only if they are certain they can hit the gun in his hand?


See: I think that if the police would end up unintentionally killing more innocent people than the gunman, I'm fairly sure people would think that an inquiry into police tactics was in order....
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 04:02 pm
And I'm quite certain that under the circumstances described, the police would be exonerated. For the police to do nothing while the gunman shot again and again and again would be unconscionable.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 04:04 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
And I'm quite certain that under the circumstances described, the police would be exonerated.


Possible. That doesn't mean that an investigation wouldn't be started in the first place.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 04:05 pm
Investigate away. Meanwhile, I certainly hope the police keep trying to take out that gunman. And I hope any cop who would sit on his hands and allow gunmen to shoot at innocents with impunity would be both investigated and then fired.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 04:07 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Investigate away. Meanwhile, I certainly hope the police keep trying to take out that gunman.


You mean: shoot first, ask questions later?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 04:08 pm
old europe wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Investigate away. Meanwhile, I certainly hope the police keep trying to take out that gunman.


You mean: shoot first, ask questions later?


If you have somebody shooting at kids or patrons in a crowded restaurant, I don't think asking questions before shooting would be a good tactical move.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 04:11 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
old europe wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Investigate away. Meanwhile, I certainly hope the police keep trying to take out that gunman.


You mean: shoot first, ask questions later?


If you have somebody shooting at kids or patrons in a crowded restaurant, I don't think asking questions before shooting would be a good tactical move.


If you have somebody shooting at kids or patrons in a crowded restaurant, I don't think employing tactics that will kill more kids or patrons than the gunman would have been able to take out seems to be counter-productive, too.

Of course, that's valid only if you don't distinguish between innocent Palestinian civilians and innocent Israeli civilians.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 04:17 pm
foxfyre; Your post made no sense at all.

Quote:
Israel sends rockets into Israel hoping to take out the people and weapons that are being fired at Israeli civilians. Good for you. I knew you had it in you.


Perhaps you meant Israel sends missles into Palestine/West Bank hoping to to take out the people sending rockets and firing at Israelis?

In any event; they do send missles where civilians are at hence the whole 'human sheild' debate we had going on through the last few days which is why I asked you if you were sure you wanted to stick with your previous statement and then clarifiedwhat I understood you to say. And then you come back this inane response. (quoted at the top)

This is the series of post main points.

Me
Quote:
Anyway, If a madman was shooting up a school or crowded restaurant; the correct answer surely would not be to send a missle to either the school or the resturaunt and kill everybody.


Foxfyre
Quote:
Agreed, so isn't it wondeful that Israel doesn't do that? Hamas does, but Israel doesn't.


Me
Quote:
Are you sure you want to stick with that? Israel does not send missles into civilian areas in order to get rockets or Hamas or Hezbala (spell?) fighters who/which are in civilian areas?


foxfrye
Quote:
Israel sends rockets into Israel hoping to take out the people and weapons that are being fired at Israeli civilians. Good for you. I knew you had it in you.


Here is one example where they do indeed fire missles from the air where civilians are at. (maybe not killing everybody; but quite a few)

Quote:
Following the Hamas rocket barrage, an Israeli airstrike in northern Gaza on Wednesday evening killed three Palestinian children. Hospital officials told Human Rights Watch the victims were Anas al-Mana'ma (age 10), Muhammad Khalil Hamada (age 12), and Bilal Hijazi (age 10). The Israeli military said the victims were preparing to launch a rocket attack. Palestinian media reported that they were playing near an abandoned portable rocket launcher in the al-Taw'am neighborhood between Beit Lahiya and Gaza City. The attack also wounded 17 persons playing in a sports field nearby, including six children. According to Palestinian media reports, Israeli attacks in Gaza in the 24 hours following Wednesday's rocket barrage into Israel killed at least 23 persons, eight of them children.

On February 23, an Israeli ground-launched shell killed three young Palestinian men near Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza. Eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that the men were not armed, and that they had seen no armed activity in the vicinity.

The Israeli man killed yesterday near Sderot was the first person killed by rocket attacks from Gaza since May 2007, and the fourteenth overall since the resumption of Israeli-Palestinian armed clashes in September 2000, according to the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem. In the same period, B'Tselem reported that 1,259 of the 2,679 Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces in the Gaza Strip were not participating in hostilities when they were killed, and 567 were minors.


http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/02/29/isrlpa18177.htm
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 06:05 pm
Yes, I did mistype. I meant to say Israel fired at rocket launchers, weapon stockpiles, and those launching rockets in Gaza. Otherwise I meant all of it.

Your article is typical of anti-Israeli reporting suggesting that Israel did something wrong and hoping the gullible will think Israel is doing what Hamas is doing which is firing trying to kill just somebody or anybody.

Israel doesn't do that. When it fires it is targeting a rocket launcher or weapon stockpile or command center. It is not targeting civilians.

If Hamas did not operate from within civilians hoping for civilians to be killed, Israel would be harming no Palestinian civilians at all. Meanwhile Hamas is purposely trying to kill as many Israeli civilians as it can.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 06:47 pm
Whatever you say foxfyre.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 07:02 pm
Revel, if you read just a little you would know that the Pals who shoot up schools are not madmen. This is the MO of the various Pal and Islamic organizations. One Pal leader says this is OK because Israeli kids grow up to be soldiers. I guess you agree.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 09:07 pm
Some Jews even refuse to serve in the IDF. Do you know why?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2008 07:44 am
Quote:
One Pal leader says this is OK because Israeli kids grow up to be soldiers. I guess you agree.


No I do not agree. In fact I think this part of the main problem I think shared between the Israelis and the Palestinians. I know you will come back with the usual response. I have conceded number one Hamas and other Palestinians groups shoot rockets and send suicide bombers in defiance of international law and it is illegal and is not excused.

However that does not let Israel have free reign to defend itself how it sees fit. There are laws which govern these things and I see no need to go over them again except to say Israel has not paid much attention to those laws. Moreover; Israel has built settlements despite UN mandates and even US wishes and and in a host of other ways deny the Palestinians freedom movement which contributes to their poverty and they cut off things they need to survive and barely provide enough in return to survive on. They punish people collectively either by killing them or depriving them of their homes with bulldozers or taking away their utilities or other things of that nature which is also wrong.

The way things are right now; both sides are locked into such a defensive position that there is no way out; Palestinians see their actions as justified and Israel see their actions as justified. I think both are unjustified wit neither side having any moral high ground when it comes to how and the manner they fight or defend themselves.

This discussion can go round and round and we have proven on this very thread that it does. I will just let it be assumed from me that you all think I am wrong and leave this particular point at that.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2008 08:18 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Some Jews even refuse to serve in the IDF. Do you know why?


Cowards?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2008 09:00 am
revel wrote:
Quote:
One Pal leader says this is OK because Israeli kids grow up to be soldiers. I guess you agree.


No I do not agree. In fact I think this part of the main problem I think shared between the Israelis and the Palestinians. I know you will come back with the usual response. I have conceded number one Hamas and other Palestinians groups shoot rockets and send suicide bombers in defiance of international law and it is illegal and is not excused.

However that does not let Israel have free reign to defend itself how it sees fit. There are laws which govern these things and I see no need to go over them again except to say Israel has not paid much attention to those laws. Moreover; Israel has built settlements despite UN mandates and even US wishes and and in a host of other ways deny the Palestinians freedom movement which contributes to their poverty and they cut off things they need to survive and barely provide enough in return to survive on. They punish people collectively either by killing them or depriving them of their homes with bulldozers or taking away their utilities or other things of that nature which is also wrong.

The way things are right now; both sides are locked into such a defensive position that there is no way out; Palestinians see their actions as justified and Israel see their actions as justified. I think both are unjustified wit neither side having any moral high ground when it comes to how and the manner they fight or defend themselves.

This discussion can go round and round and we have proven on this very thread that it does. I will just let it be assumed from me that you all think I am wrong and leave this particular point at that.



Israel is trying to do just enough to deter the Pals from attacking Israel. So far, the former hasn't done enough. Thus, Israel may have to mount a major invasion of Gaza, making it pay a big price, to get the Pals to stop.

Anent this, consider Lebanon. After taking 10 years of various attacks from Hezbollah, Israel mounted a major invasion, doing a great deal of damage to Lebanon and Hezbollah. Since then, Hezbollah has not made a significant attack on Israel.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:50 pm
c.i. wrote :

Quote:
Some Jews even refuse to serve in the IDF. Do you know why?


i understand that members of "neturei karta" do not serve in the IDF since they do not ecognize the state of israel .
i seem to recall that students of certain jewish seminaries are excused from serving as well .
hbg


Quote:
Neturei Karta - (Aramaic Literally, "keepers of the gates.") (so called - "Jews against Zionism") A tiny sect of fanatic ultra-orthodox anti-Zionist Jews who do not recognize the state of Israel. They claim that the Jewish state can only be formed when the Messiah comes.

The Neturei Karta are estimated as having about 5,000 members in Israel and sympathizers and members abroad. They are allied with the Satmar Hassidim and have an ideology similar to that of the Vienna anti-Zionist group


see article :
NETUREI KARTA
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 06:08 am
Keepin' on lyin'. It's become habit.

Quote:
Bush told U.S.-funded Radio Farda, which broadcasts into Iran in Farsi, that Iranian leaders have "declared they want to have a nuclear weapon to destroy people," a statement that went well beyond the findings of the NIE.

Cheney, meanwhile, jousted with ABC's Martha Raddatz when she tried to pin him down on whether he agreed with the NIE's finding that Iran shut down its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Despite having several opportunities to endorse this finding, the vice president said in an interview only that "I have high confidence they have an ongoing enrichment program."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/23/AR2008032301422.html?hpid=moreheadlines
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 08:23 am
Quote:
SPIEGEL: When you were in Iraq, your team found out that 'Curveball's' story had nothing to do with the truth. How did CIA leadership react to your findings?

Kay: With resistance and denial. It was an absolute refusal to face reality. I just kept on hearing, 'don't stop now. Keep working. You must be wrong. You will find it. Keep looking.' [...]

SPIEGEL: But nothing was ever foundÂ…

Kay: No and my e-mails became less and less friendly. There was a war going on in Baghdad, the members of my team were risking their lives every day, and the Germans kept on refusing us access to the source. When we finally got permission, it was even worse.
http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/007204.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/05/2025 at 04:25:13