15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 12:45 pm
embedded in the article : AFTER IRAQ are some interactive historical maps of the middle-east .

Quote:
Who has controlled the Middle East over the course of history? Pretty much everyone. Egyptians, Turks, Jews, Romans, Arabs, Persians, Europeans...the list goes on. Who will control the Middle East today? That is a much bigger question.


have a look and see what might be logical next step ... ... i certainly don't know !

here is one of them , called : 5,000 YEARS OF HISTORY IN 90 SECONDS

there are two more maps embedded in the text .
hbg

while the article AFTER IRAQ is quite an important article imo , i have not copied it here ; it would take up quite a bit of space .
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 12:53 pm
As I read Fox's last post, I wondered to myself that I had to agree with her opinions about Israel. It boils down to both sides being reasonable and realistic; not make impossible demands of the other without meeting some of their own responsibilities.

Thank you, Fox, for a well thought out piece on this hot-button issue.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 12:56 pm
the commision appointed by israel's government to investigate Israel's 2006 war against Hezbollah in Lebanon has just handed its report to the government .

Quote:

Israel probe finds war 'failure'

Israel's 2006 war against Hezbollah in Lebanon was a "large and serious" failure, according to an Israeli government-appointed inquiry.
Military and political leaders had no clear strategy, which meant Israel was "dragged" into an inconclusive ground operation in Lebanon, the report said.

PM Ehud Olmert has insisted he will not step down despite the findings.

However, public pressure could grow on partners in his governing coalition to pull out, analysts say.


Hostilities broke out in July 2006, when Hezbollah fighters captured two Israeli soldiers in a cross border raid that left three other soldiers dead.
In the conflict that followed, more than 1,000 Lebanese died, mostly civilians, along with 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers, but the captured soldiers have still not been freed.

Completion prevented

The report said Israel could have taken two courses - a quick, devastating blow against Hezbollah or a sustained ground operation - but failed to decide on either.

"The fact Israel went to war before it decided which option to select, and without an exit strategy... constituted serious failures, which affected the whole war," report chairman Eliyahu Winograd said.





"As a result, Israel did not stop after its early military achievements, and was dragged into a ground operation only after the political and diplomatic timetable prevented its effective completion," he added.
The report is highly critical of military commanders, especially in the ground forces.

"All in all, the IDF [Israeli army] failed, especially because of the conduct of the high command and the ground forces, to provide an effective military response to the challenge posed to it by the war in Lebanon," retired senior judge Mr Winograd said.

There has been considerable interest among Israelis about a last-minute ground offensive in the hours before a UN-brokered ceasefire, in which 33 Israeli soldiers were killed.

The report said the engagement did not improve Israel's position and there were "serious failings" in army command.

However, Mr Olmert acted in what was "the interest of the state of Israel", as it appeared at the time, when he authorised the offensive.

Repairs

The report recommends "systematic and profound" changes in thinking in the political and military leaderships if Israel is to face up to future challenges.

Israel cannot survive without the belief that it has "the political and military leadership, military capabilities, and social robustness" to deter aggressors, the report says.

Mr Olmert's aides said the criticism in the report was not as harsh as they had been preparing for.

"The prime minister and the government take responsibility and will make repairs," his cabinet secretary, Oved Yehezkel, said.

In Beirut, a Hezbollah spokesman said the report vindicated everything the Shia Muslim militant and political organisation had said before.

"Israel failed completely in achieving its goals and the Israeli army suffered a military defeat at the hands of Hezbollah," Hussein Rahal said.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/7218073.stm

Published: 2008/01/30 18:02:39 GMT

© BBC MMVIII



source :
OFFICIAL REPORT : WAR A FAILURE
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 01:50 pm
I think expecting Israel to afford full citizenship rights to any Palestinian, no matter how hostile to Israel, is not a viable option. How many of us would be willing to grant full citizenship rights to anybody who moved into our country no matter who it was?

I wonder, however, if it would be possible:

a) Hamas and Hezbollah agree to a permanent cease fire on Irael in return for a viable Palestinian homeland.

b) Israel agrees to relinquish to the Palestinians a contiguous land mass in Northern Israel approximately the size of the combined Golan Heights, Gaza, and the West Bank in return for Palestine relinquishing the West Bank and Gaza to Israel. Palestine thus acquires a good bit of coastline and free access to markets in Lebanon and Jordan plus presumably Israel should a viable diplomatic relationship be established.

c) The international community provides sufficient funds to assist with the relocations. The main sticky wickets would probably be in convincing Jews and Arabs living in Northern Israel to relocate and in convincing the Palestinians to give up their part of Jerusalem. Lebanon also could object to so many Palestinians moving in next door, but that probably would not be an issue.

If this concept should become fact though, expect the Jews to immediately tear down the mosque and rebuild the Temple on the temple mount. This will trigger widespread religious activity, if not panic, among Christian fundamentalists around the world who will be certain that Armageddon and the end of the world will be upon us.

But evenso, why couldn't it work? Unless as has been suggested, Israel is doomed geographically and demographically anyway.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 01:53 pm
Well, for starters Jerusalem is a holy city for the Pals as well; and they will act as irrationally not to give it up as the Jews will. So that's a non-starter. It really should be made into an independent protectorate a la Rome, not beholden to either state but a religious site for all to enjoy.

Quote:
How many of us would be willing to grant full citizenship rights to anybody who moved into our country no matter who it was?


Funny, that's how many Palestinians felt when Israel was thrust upon them after ww2.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 02:16 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
b) Israel agrees to relinquish to the Palestinians a contiguous land mass in Northern Israel approximately the size of the combined Golan Heights, Gaza, and the West Bank in return for Palestine relinquishing the West Bank and Gaza to Israel. Palestine thus acquires a good bit of coastline and free access to markets in Lebanon and Jordan plus presumably Israel should a viable diplomatic relationship be established.


http://i29.tinypic.com/2h52slg.jpg

I suppose, your proposal raises more questions than how to convince Jews and Palestinians to move and to give up their land and property ...
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 02:47 pm
Israel should not make concessions for, or provide assistance to, the WB and Gaza until the Pals in those places recognize Israel's right to exist and permanently cease attacking Israel.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 02:53 pm
Split like Korea; north and south, then allow the freedom of movement - both ways. Jerusalem can't be part of the deal; one ownership will never work. LIke the old city split into Arab, Jew, and Christian sections, it must remain. Nothing else will work.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 02:55 pm
Advocate wrote:
Israel should not make concessions for, or provide assistance to, the WB and Gaza until the Pals in those places recognize Israel's right to exist and permanently cease attacking Israel.


With that mentality, the Jews are going to have decades more of violence and death.

Don't you realize that your pride is what really is at stake here? That you are willing to let the conflict rage forever, in order to assay your feelings that the other guys 'started it?'

You oughta grow up, man. That's a child's position on arguments.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 02:57 pm
Advocate has the mentality of a Zionist.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 03:04 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Advocate has the mentality of a Zionist.


A Zionist is one who favors the existence of Israel. I fit that description. You and Cyclo love to flame me, but make and support no valid points. You both are intellectually bankrupt.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 03:07 pm
Look who's talking about being mentally bankrupt. You don't even have the decency to acknowledge what Fox wrote about the responsibility of both sides needing to come to terms with the violence and other issues.

You only see one extreme side of the picture.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 03:08 pm
I believe it is more accurate to say that a Zionist is one who favors the continued existence of Israel as a Jewish state, one that is committed to the perpetual treatment of non-Jews diferently from Jews within that state - and regardless of the demographic evolution of the state.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 03:14 pm
Advocate wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Advocate has the mentality of a Zionist.


A Zionist is one who favors the existence of Israel. I fit that description. You and Cyclo love to flame me, but make and support no valid points. You both are intellectually bankrupt.


Sorry, but I did make valid points which you have consistently either refused to answer or ignored completely. If this were a debate you would have lost long ago on the petulance of your argument.

I ask you again to repudiate your former position and declare that all ethnic groups are inherently equal in worth.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 03:24 pm
Despite the unrelenting terrorism, including thousands of missile and shelling attacks, from the Pals, as well as nonrecognition, Israel has gone to great lengths to come to reasonable terms with the WB and Gaza. So far, the Pals have resisted these efforts. They still believe, and may be correct, that Israel will be destroyed. This will delight the likes of CI, Cyclo, and George.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 03:33 pm
Advocate wrote:
Despite the unrelenting terrorism, including thousands of missile and shelling attacks, from the Pals, as well as nonrecognition, Israel has gone to great lengths to come to reasonable terms with the WB and Gaza. So far, the Pals have resisted these efforts. They still believe, and may be correct, that Israel will be destroyed. This will delight the likes of CI, Cyclo, and George.


Even the Saudis proposed - several years ago - to establish Normal relations with Israel, including full recognition, provided only that the 1967 borders with the West Bank and Gaza were restored. Attendant to this was the understanding that some special status for Jerusalem might also be required. If Israel has indeed "gone to great lengths..." why did they reject this offer?

The obvious explanation is that, given the political facts in Israel, the retention of the expropriated lands in the occupied territories (and second class status for any Palestinians who remain in them), is more important to Zionists than peace and justice.

Given the demographic facts in the region, Advocate's views are far more likely to lead to the eventual destruction of Israel than mine.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 04:08 pm
Advocate wrote:
Despite the unrelenting terrorism, including thousands of missile and shelling attacks, from the Pals, as well as nonrecognition, Israel has gone to great lengths to come to reasonable terms with the WB and Gaza. So far, the Pals have resisted these efforts. They still believe, and may be correct, that Israel will be destroyed. This will delight the likes of CI, Cyclo, and George.


Your definition of 'reasonable' is ridiculous, of course.

Not allowing people to have access to water is reasonable?

Cutting up their lands and people, making it so they have to pass through Israeli checkpoints to reach the next town over; that's reasonable?

Installing more and more Jewish settlements in the West bank and sucking up the resources there - reasonable?

Killing over a thousand Pal kids in the last 7 years - reasonable?

You aren't qualified to be an impartial judge of what is and isn't reasonable, Adv. You have proven this.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 08:04 pm
georgeob1 wrote:

I believe the former situation in Northern Ireland provides many useful analogies to the situation in Israel/Palestine today. It too involved a long-standing sectarian dispute involving long-term residents and others who immigrated there (some 300 years ago) and who saw themselves as a somewhat beseiged and "special" people, while utterly dominating the political and economic life of the country. The analogy extends to to neighbors (the Republic of Ireland in this case) who were sympathetic to the disaffected minority, and to the powerful patron (in this case the UK) that protected the dominating "special" community. The analogy extends too to the demography, as the former Protestant/Calvanist majority in Northern Ireland saw itself (in the 1980s) rapidly becoming a minority.

It is interesting to note that peace came only after (1) The Irish Republic renounced the revolutionary IRA; (2) The UK abandoned its former implicit committment to continued Protestant domination, and finally undertook the extremely difficult task of combatting the revolutionaries on both sides while attempting to create the political foundations for peace; (3) The people of Northern Ireland (both Catholic and Protestant) finally realized that peace and accomodation was far better than the continued struggle in pursuit of the illusion of dominance; and lastly (4) that all parties rejected the remaining revolutionaries on both sides of the dispute who bombed and killed out of habit and whose stature was based on continued conflict and not peace.

The lesson of history may well be that the analogous events in the Middle east must also occur if peace is to be found there as well.


Well, in my opinion, I can agree that it is correct to compare Israelis to the Protestant Irish. In fact, American Jews are probably up there with WASP's for socio-economic clout. I'll even be unhumble and add I.Q.

But, you all Gentiles can't really empathize with Israel's concerns, I believe. You need to realize that if Jews just lived in Diaspora countries (Zionist Israel being gone), quite comfortably perhaps, it is only a matter of time that through assimilation, Hitler's goal will be reached with no gas, and no bullets. That's what American Jews are aware of, and many feel that it is only the Orthodox that might remain Jews for some extended time into the future. But, with a non-Zionist Israel, time will be on the side of eliminating Jews from the world.

So, if Israel ever appears intransigent, I believe the feeling is that Zionist Israel is the end of the line for Jewish survival. They won't survive anywhere else. Assimilation through inter-marriage will not happen overnight, but it will happen (for every Jewish son that avoids a wife like his Jewish mother, there's a Christian/Gentile girl that is avoiding a husband like her Christian/Gentile father - I hope that reality doesn't offend any of you guys).

And, what I suspect no one can relate to is that your willingness to offer your heartfelt solutions to a country, that is really foreign to all of you, really is why some Jews want to live in a country where they can pretend the whole world is Jewish (i.e., Jewish garbagemen, Jewish postman, Jewish construction worker, etc., etc.) In other words, I don't believe any of you can relate to your attitude, that living in your first world existences, you all believe you have every right to pontificate to a region of the world you have so little connection to. Perhaps you all don't, based on some arcane principle of minding one's own business (perhaps the aid from the U.S. gives you taxpaying citizens that right in your minds - but you're really too removed to make truly knowledgeable comments).

Also, CI, isn't there a people that live in northern Japan that are not ethnic Japanese, and are sort of excluded from the main Japanese society? And, how come no one criticizes Japan for not allowing migration of non-Japanese to their country? Japan really maintains an exclusive society of ethnic Japanese. The world accepts this, but criticizes Israel for being ethnically Jewish? Sounds like a double standard. Also, no one criticizes America for giving protection to Japan. Interesting, I think.

I offer the thought of morphing this thread into discussing whether the U.S. was correct to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Doesn't Israel and the Palestinians get sort of boring after awhile?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 08:18 pm
foofie wrote: Also, CI, isn't there a people that live in northern Japan that are not ethnic Japanese, and are sort of excluded from the main Japanese society? And, how come no one criticizes Japan for not allowing migration of non-Japanese to their country? Japan really maintains an exclusive society of ethnic Japanese. The world accepts this, but criticizes Israel for being ethnically Jewish? Sounds like a double standard. Also, no one criticizes America for giving protection to Japan. Interesting, I think.


I'll go much further than you; Japan is a racist country who treats their minorities with disdain. Just because I'm Japanese doesn't mean I agree with Japan's policies that I have nothing to do with - their culture or their politics. The one thing Japan has over Israel is that the Koreans, Chinese, and the Ainus are free to move around in Japan, work jobs within their borders, and make a decent living. They don't take away properties from their minorities, they essentially live under the same laws as everybody else, and they have the freedom of movement throughout Japan. The Japanese even discriminates against other Japanese if they belong to the wrong "class." You don't have to educate me on Japan; I've done enough of my own.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jan, 2008 08:22 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
foofie wrote: Also, CI, isn't there a people that live in northern Japan that are not ethnic Japanese, and are sort of excluded from the main Japanese society? And, how come no one criticizes Japan for not allowing migration of non-Japanese to their country? Japan really maintains an exclusive society of ethnic Japanese. The world accepts this, but criticizes Israel for being ethnically Jewish? Sounds like a double standard. Also, no one criticizes America for giving protection to Japan. Interesting, I think.


I'll go much further than you; Japan is a racist country who treats their minorities with disdain. Just because I'm Japanese doesn't mean I agree with Japan's policies that I have nothing to do with - their culture or their politics. The one thing Japan has over Israel is that the Koreans, Chinese, and the Ainus are free to move around in Japan, work jobs within their borders, and make a decent living. They don't take away properties from their minorities, they essentially live under the same laws as everybody else, and they have the freedom of movement throughout Japan. The Japanese even discriminates against other Japanese if they belong to the wrong "class." You don't have to educate me on Japan; I've done enough of my own.


God bless America!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 02/24/2025 at 05:27:16