Bring the Troops Home

And the Shite militias are operating in "self-defense" against violence against them carried out by outfits like Zarqawi's.

Quote:

Today's U.S. Army consists entirely of mercenaries whose loyalty is largely to their immediate leaders, not some lofty, patriotric ideal.

Quote:

Bring back the draft, I say, and see how soon this nonsense is ended.
The parents of draftees would beseige Washington. The parents of volunteer enlistees can't really do that (although, as we know, one mother has done it): after all, these guys volunteered for it, didn't they.

hey asherman does you name have anything to do with the wheel of time?

There is, however a very vocal and loud minority who like to compare our soldiers to Nazi SS troopers.

Quote:

This ain't no wave-the-flag-play-a-Toby-Keith-song-and-go-about-your-business-proposition, this Iraq war.

Ask "The Troops."

If you care about "The Troops" then surely you care about what they think.

Surely you are not going to suggest that the young men and women who are risking their lives for American policy are incapable of intelligently determining whether or not that risk is worth it.

Overwhelmingly, "The Troops" in Iraq believe in what they are doing and want America to value their efforts and their considerable sacrifices.

It may very well be the case that war supporters don't appreciate the degree of sacrifice of our young men and women. It is equally the case that war opponents do not appreciate the willingness and choice of these young men and women to accept this sacrifice.

Ask "The Troops."

Has anyone done so?

Do these men and women want us, here in the Homeland, to endorse and praise their actions and efforts or to organize to bring them home?

Ask "The Troops."

Has anyone done so?

Polls, Pundits and Pols
You'd never know it from some of the reporting and bloviating on the debate over an Iraq withdrawal, but all major polls show that the public favors withdrawals, with strong support for a timeline or total pullout within a year.

(June 22, 2006) -- The new efforts by Republicans in Congress, and in the media, to use Iraq to their advantage by branding Democrats as favoring a "cut-and-run'" policy, has received wide coverage in the past week. Often pundits, and even reporters, have suggested that this is working, because Americans are not in favor of a "hasty" withdrawal. Democrats are in shambles, they report, as they fear that proposals for setting a timetable for withdrawal put forward by Sen. John Kerry and Rep. John Murtha will prove disastrous for the party in the November elections, due to the alleged unpopularity of this stance.

This conclusion, however, flies in the face of surveys by all major polling firms, as E&P has chronicled over the past two years.

It's one thing when polls are dismissed, ignored or twisted by political or media spinmeisters. But when journalists in their news stories do it, it is downright misleading.

Take Jim Rutenberg and Adam Nagourney in The New York Times today.

They produced a front-pager on the Republicans' unexpected confidence on this issue, and declared: "Some polls show a majority of Americans continue to think that entering Iraq was a mistake, and pollsters say independent voters are particularly open to the idea of setting some sort of timetable for withdrawal, the very policy Democrats have embraced and Republicans are now fighting."

The fact is, not "some" polls, but virtually every major poll shows that American have long declared that going to war against Iraq was a mistake.

And far more than "independent voters" are drawn to withdrawal. Every major poll reveals that a majority of Americans advocate withdrawals from Iraq, with large numbers wanting this to be quite speedy, and most wanting a full pullout in a year or so (Kerry's idea) or by the end of next year.

This is hardly a "some" position. A CNN poll, for example, conducted June 14-15 found that 53% favored a timetable for withdrawal, while 41% opposed it. Yet newspaper editorials, as usual, remain mute on this and the Senate today soundly trounced the Democrats' withdrawal pleas, even a wishy-washy one put forward by Sen. Carl Levin.

In highlighting the Republicans' new spin on Iraq, Rutenberg and Nagourney stated, "The approach might yet be upended by more problems in Iraq." This laughably suggests that voters are okay with the current situation -- so long as it doesn't get worse.

On Wednesday, Charles Babington in The Washington Post noted "polls showing that many Americans oppose the war but do not want to leave Iraq amid such chaos that it is a breeding ground for terrorism." Again: All major surveys show that a clear majority do want us to "leave Iraq," partly because of that very "chaos."

And how is this for a bottom line poll result? The CBS News poll taken less than two weeks ago asked if what has transpired in Iraq was "worth the loss of American life and other costs." The result: 62% said "no."

Yet Sen. John McCain actually suggested today that any timetable would be "a significant step on the road to disaster" -- as if we haven't been on that road for three years, and already found disaster.

I happen to have a full printout of a detailed NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey completed 10 days ago. It shows, among other things, that 57% of respondents support reducing troop levels now, with only 35% favoring current levels. The vast majority of those backing withdrawal favor setting a timellne. The same poll finds just 35% supporting the job President Bush is doing on Iraq.

But here's the key finding. The pollsters stated a series of positions, ranging from opposing gay marriage to repealing the estate tax, and asked if a candidate running for congress who embraced such a position was more or less likely to gain their vote. One position was: "Favors pulling all American troops out of Iraq within the next 12 months."

That couldn't be more simple and clear. The result? Some 54% said they would be "more likely" to vote for such a candidate and only 32% said "less likely."

They were then asked to rank the most important issues for this fall's election. Iraq topped the list at 53% with illegal immigration far behind at 32%. This survey, and recent ones from Gallup, strongly show that the public very much prefers Democrats in this year's races and, in fact, would like to see a Democratic congress to balance the Republican White House.

Of course, time will tell if they actually go ahead and vote their beliefs. But reading the latest poll results, one might conclude the opposite of what many reporters and pundits now seem to be suggesting: that, actually, the GOP faces an uphill fight on re-selling the Iraq war, now in its fourth year.

Ask "The Troops."

If you care about "The Troops" then surely you care about what they think.

Surely you are not going to suggest that the young men and women who are risking their lives for American policy are incapable of intelligently determining whether or not that risk is worth it.

Overwhelmingly, "The Troops" in Iraq believe in what they are doing and want America to value their efforts and their considerable sacrifices.

It may very well be the case that war supporters don't appreciate the degree of sacrifice of our young men and women. It is equally the case that war opponents do not appreciate the willingness and choice of these young men and women to accept this sacrifice.

Ask "The Troops."

Has anyone done so?

Do these men and women want us, here in the Homeland, to endorse and praise their actions and efforts or to organize to bring them home?

Ask "The Troops."

Has anyone done so?

Almost 90% think war is retaliation for Saddam's role in 9/11